We are creating a unified UKRI website that brings together the existing research council, Innovate UK and Research England websites.
If you would like to be involved in its development let us know.

Peer review

The Research Councils of UKRI fund research on a competitive basis employing independent expert peer review.

In peer review, proposals for research funding are considered and assessed for scientific quality by a number of senior academics or "peers", from the UK and overseas, who work within relevant areas of research. This assessment or "review" provides the basis of the funding decision.

The peer review processes employed are designed to be sensitive to the different needs and cultures that exist within the academic community and also reflect the variety of mechanisms employed to support different types of research e.g. basic or strategic research, or the need to encourage adventurous or multidisciplinary research.

Each Research Council publishes information about its peer review process and these can be found using the links below:

Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
Medical Research Council (MRC)
Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)

Whilst maintaining a commitment to use a variety of approaches to peer review, Councils are keen to simplify and standardise the processes involved in applying for research funding. Councils regularly review their policies and procedures as their research communities evolve and continually strive to provide more effective administrative services.

Peer Review Framework

The research councils' Peer Review Framework describes how peer review is used in assessing proposals and making funding decisions. The framework also outlines what information is routinely published relating to proposals and awards, and the approach taken by the councils in responding to requests for information about the assessment process. The framework is designed for use by Applicants and Research Organisations, Board/Panel members and external reviewers, members of the public and Research Council staff.

Peer Review Framework (PDF, 265KB)

Research Councils UK 2018 statement on the responsible use of metrics

Research Councils UK (RCUK) was the umbrella organisation for the seven Research Councils (AHRC, BBSRC, EPSRC, ESRC, MRC, NERC and STFC) before the formation of UKRI. In February 2018 RCUK published a statement on the responsible use of metrics (PDF, 144KB) and signed the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). The statement includes a commitment to update the principles that councils will use to guide researchers applying for research council funding, to guide reviewers in assessing these applications, and to guide evaluations of the work that results.  Central to this guidance is a commitment to avoid the use of journal-based metrics such as Journal Impact Factors, and metrics such as the ‘H-index’ as surrogate measures of the quality of publications or individuals, but to assess the content of specific papers, when considering the impact of an individual researcher’s contribution.