What happens after you submit your proposal - NERC

Contents

Managing conflicts of interest in peer review

A conflict of interest occurs when an individual involved in the assessment of a proposal for funding has a personal, professional or organisational relationship with the applicants, affecting their ability to undertake their role in an objective and unbiased way. If you are asked to take part in NERC peer review, either to review a NERC proposal or be a member of a NERC moderating or assessment panel then you need to be aware of the NERC policy on conflicts of interest.

The NERC policy defines a conflict of interest as being associated or involved in any way with either or both of the following:

  • an institution, department or individual that has submitted a funding proposal or would otherwise benefit from a decision
  • the development or implementation of proposals seeking NERC or UKRI funds or in the evaluation of research investments.

See Conflict of interest guidance for NERC reviewers and panel members for information on what constitutes a conflict of interest for NERC, where reviewers and panel members should inform NERC about potential conflicts of interest and how these will be managed by NERC.

Last updated: 17 August 2021

NOTE Council web content is being transitioned to this website – let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments.