Applicants should demonstrate that they meet the following criteria.
Zoological and conservation science expertise:
- demonstrate world-leading subject knowledge in zoological and conservation science.
Higher education research funding:
- experience of managing university funding (or research institute equivalent) and understanding of the business models they employ
Public funding and value for money:
- understanding of assessing financial sustainability, leverage of public funds, and value for money, within the context of a higher education provider’s or research institute’s business model
Research institute governance:
- experience in governing or evaluating research institutes or large-scale research teams, units or departments
- demonstrate leadership in the context of zoological and conservation research institutes within England and internationally
Research culture:
- experience of promoting and assessing research culture
Additionally, Research England will look to ensure that the group is diverse and that every stage of the review, including the application and selection process, aligns with Research England’s action plan for equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI).
Additional criteria
Applicants wishing to apply for the role of chair should additionally demonstrate that they meet the following criteria.
Proven leadership in strategic reviews:
- demonstrated experience leading major independent reviews or national funding panels, particularly within research policy, higher education, or public sector funding
- ability to steer discussions towards consensus while ensuring all viewpoints are considered
Strong understanding of public funding governance:
- knowledge of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), Research England, and the broader research funding landscape, including accountability mechanisms, funding streams (for example, QR), and policy priorities
- familiarity with principles of public value, impact, and value for money
High-level communication and stakeholder engagement skills:
- skilled at communicating complex evidence and findings clearly to different stakeholders
- can manage sensitive issues diplomatically
Commitment to equity and integrity:
- a track record of fostering inclusive, transparent, and evidence-driven processes
- committed to embedding EDI principles and research culture awareness in the review process