Data management plan - STFC

The data management plan (DMP) attachment is mandatory for most STFC schemes (except Public Engagement). This is because most projects would result in the production or collection of scientific data.

If it is felt that a DMP is not relevant to a proposal then an attachment explaining this should be uploaded to pass the Joint Electronic Submission (Je-S) system validation requirement.

The plan should be no longer than two pages of A4.

The data management plan together with any costs associated with it, will be considered and assessed by the normal peer review process. The data management plan should explain how the data will be managed over the lifetime of the project and, where appropriate, preserved for future re-use.


STFC expects that data resulting from the research it funds should be made openly available after any proprietary period. Data management plans should include an outline of how this will be achieved. Any reasons for not eventually sharing data should be explained (for example, legislative, ethical, commercial, privacy and security issues).

In the case of proposals that are part of a larger collaborative project, STFC recognises that data management may not be within the sole control of the applicant or the applicant’s Institute. In such cases, where a suitable project wide data management plan exists, this may be referred to.

STFC does not stipulate a specific format for data management plans and applicants may structure them in the way most appropriate to the project. However, they should be clear, concise and proportionate – both to the scale and type of the datasets generated – and take into account the value of the data, the likely level of future re-use, the complexity and levels of data, and the cost effectiveness of preservation compared to re-creation. It is recommended that plans follow published recommendations for best practice, and applicants are encouraged to consult the guidance provided by the Digital Curation Centre.

What the data management plan should specify

As a general guide, the plan should specify the following.

Types of data generated

Specify the types of data the research will generate. Data management plans should describe the types of data that are expected to be produced from the project, including the raw data arising directly from the research, the reduced data derived from it, and published data.

Types of data preserved

Specify which data will be preserved and how. Unless there are compelling reasons not to do so, STFC expects data to be managed through an established repository, chosen to maximise the scientific value from aggregation of related data. This may be at the grant holder’s institution or elsewhere.

Data management plans may refer to the general policies of the chosen repository and only include further details if necessary to the specific project. (If it is proposed not to use an established repository, the data management plan will need to demonstrate that resources and systems will be in place to enable the data to be curated effectively beyond the lifetime of the grant, although STFC recognises that applicants may not have the expertise to describe in detail how data will be curated).

Software and metadata implications

Specify the software and metadata implications. The data management plan should specify the software and metadata that will be retained to enable the data to be read and interpreted.

Length of data preservation

Specify for how long the data will be preserved. This may depend on the type of data. Where possible, STFC expects the original data, from which other related data can in principle be derived, to be retained for a minimum of 10 years from the end of the project. For data that by their nature cannot be re-measured, efforts should be made to retain them indefinitely.

Value of data to others

Specify and justify which data will have value to others and should be shared. Any data that is shared should be of a sufficiently high quality to be of value to other researchers. In general, published data – data that is displayed or otherwise referred to in a publication – should be made publicly available, but it is for applicants to consider and justify which types of data will, in the context of their project, meaningfully and practically constitute published data. Publicly available means available to anyone, but there may be a requirement for registration to enable tracking of data use and to provide notification of terms and conditions of use where they apply.

Other data should be made available wherever it is appropriate and cost-effective to do so, taking into account the cost of curation compared with the cost or feasibility of re-creation, the potential long-term demand for the data and the feasibility of their reuse by others.

Length of proprietary period

Specify and justify the length of any proprietary period. This might for example refer to the reasonable needs of the research team to have a first opportunity to exploit the results of their research, including any intellectual property arising. Where there are accepted norms within a scientific field or specific archive they should normally be followed. In general, STFC expects that published data should be made publicly available within six months of publication unless justified otherwise.

How data will be shared

Specify how data will be shared. The minimum level of data sharing expected would be that of making the data available in the natural format in which they were created, along with documentation and metadata, according to the standard accepted procedures within the scientific field.

Where the data is likely to be in great demand by others it may be appropriate to request resources for a more proactive approach to data sharing, which maximises opportunities for cross linkage with other sectors.

Resources needed to preserve and share data

Specify and justify any resources required to preserve and share the data. Wherever possible, data management should make use of existing skills and capabilities. However, justification should be made for any additional specialist staff (or training for existing staff) needed within the grant to enable the research team to manage, preserve and share data effectively; and for any computational facilities needed to manage, store and share the data generated by the research.

Last updated: 17 August 2021

This is the website for UKRI: our seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Let us know if you have some quick feedback or help us improve your experience by taking three minutes to tell us what you think of the UKRI website.