Assessment process
We will assess your application using the following process.
The Canadian principal applicant will submit a single collaborative proposal on behalf of the Canadian and international research teams. NSERC, as the lead agency, will conduct the merit review of the proposal.
Review process
NSERC will first conduct an administrative assessment to ensure the applications are complete and comply with all requirements. This step includes all participating funders’ eligibility assessments.
Once the administrative assessment is complete, NSERC will proceed with the merit assessment of the applications via an expert panel.
Expert panel review
With input from participating funders, NSERC will invite and convene an expert peer review committee of scientific experts to assist in assessing applications quality and rank applications alongside other applications. After which the panel will make a funding recommendation.
The committee will assess the applications according to the merit evaluation criteria and merit indicators.
NSERC will assess equity, diversity and inclusion considerations in the Canadian training plan through a separate administrative process. NSERC staff will contact the Canadian principal applicant for additional information if required.
Funding decisions
NSERC, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), EPSRC and NordForsk will jointly determine funding recommendation outcomes and fund selected projects to support the activities of eligible researchers in their respective countries.
After these awards are made, National Science Foundation (NSF) will make its funding decisions on the supplementary US components, following its existing processes for international supplements as outlined in NSF 22-108.
Post assessment process information
Projects with UK participants recommended for funding following the peer review process will be invited to submit their application through the Funding Service UK costs associated with these projects will be administered as UKRI awards.
This step is procedural only. Projects recommended for funding will not undergo any further assessment of their scientific or programme merit at this stage. However, standard checks relating to finances, eligibility and compliance with UKRI policies and requirements (for example equality, diversity and inclusion, and trusted research and innovation requirements) will be completed before awards are made.
Details of the submission route and required actions will be provided when the funding decision is communicated.
Timescale
We aim to complete the assessment process within approximately three months of receiving your application.
UK project teams recommended for funding through the international peer review process will be invited to submit a full application via the Funding Service.
Invitations are expected to be issued in January 2027, with successful projects anticipated to start by the end of March 2027.
Principles of assessment
We support the San Francisco declaration on research assessment and recognise the relationship between research assessment and research integrity.
Find out about the UKRI principles of assessment and decision making.
Using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in expert review
Reviewers and panellists are not permitted to use generative AI tools to develop their assessment, including to correct language, spelling, grammar and formatting. Using these tools can potentially compromise the confidentiality of the ideas that applicants have entrusted to UKRI and NSERC to safeguard.
For more detail see UKRI policy on the use of generative AI and NSERC guidance on the use of Artificial Intelligence in the development and review of research grant proposals.
Assessment areas
The assessment areas that we will use are the NSERC Merit evaluation criteria.
For more detail see the assessment questions and criteria under the ‘Review’ heading in the ‘How to apply’ section which can be found on the NSERC funding opportunity page.