Funding opportunity

Funding opportunity: Cohort and Longitudinal Studies Enhancement Resource: invite only

This is an invite-only funding opportunity for the Cohort and Longitudinal Studies Enhancement Resource (CLOSER) from 2024 to 2028 to continue to deliver its current objectives which serve the biomedical and social science communities.

The full economic cost of your project can be up to £7,000,000. ESRC will fund 80% of the full economic cost.

The funding will start on 1 October 2024 until 30 September 2028.

Who can apply

You can only apply for this funding opportunity if we have invited you to do so.

For more information on the background of this funding opportunity, go to the Additional information section.

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) has introduced new role types for funding opportunities being run on the new UKRI Funding Service.

For full details, visit Eligibility as an individual.

Equality, diversity and inclusion

We are committed to achieving equality of opportunity for all funding applicants. We encourage applications from a diverse range of researchers.

We support people to work in a way that suits their personal circumstances. This includes:

  • career breaks
  • support for people with caring responsibilities
  • flexible working
  • alternative working patterns

Find out more about equality, diversity and inclusion at UKRI.

What we're looking for

Aim

University College London is invited to submit a proposal for a new grant to continue the Cohort and Longitudinal Studies Enhancement Resource (CLOSER), which will:

  • continue to deliver its current objectives, as set out in the ‘Scope’ section below
  • contribute to the delivery of activities specified in the Population Research UK Prospectus (PDF, 1.4MB), including (but not limited to):
    • Recommendation one: Enabling wider discovery of Longitudinal Population Studies (LPS) data
    • Recommendation four: Act on behalf of the LPS community and catalyse new cross-community activities
    • Recommendation five: Build capacity and skills in data management and practices
  • support the delivery of ESRC’s Data Infrastructure Strategy

Scope

To provide and develop facilities which enhance data discovery, through an online platform, CLOSER Discovery, your application should:

  • indicate how the platform will continue to increase the visibility of publicly funded research datasets and enhance data discovery across the 19 member studies, expanding and stimulating further cross-study research. Where resources allow, this may include expanding Discovery to include additional studies funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and the Medical Research Council
  • outline how CLOSER will continue to improve access to metadata and assist LPS in developing and sharing knowledge of how data have been collected (from the underlying concepts defining the area of investigation, to the type of question asked and the methods by which data is recorded and processed) ensuring CLOSER Discovery continues as an increasingly important resource for the LPS community
  • articulate how Discovery will be further developed as the UK’s most detailed search engine for longitudinal data and thus, increasing the use, visibility, and awareness of longitudinal study datasets
  • articulate how meeting this objective will also contribute delivery of ‘Recommendation one: Enabling wider discovery of LPS data’ as stated in the PRUK Prospectus

To support programmes of knowledge exchange and collaboration your application should:

  • demonstrate how CLOSER will promote and share knowledge and learning, working to improve practice, and stimulate research while showcasing the value of the data produced by the LPS to the academic community and beyond
  • explain how CLOSER can enable and facilitate interdisciplinary research by coordinating across LPS; providing clear indications of how CLOSER will take the lead in developing new initiatives and collaborations building on the expertise and learning and ensuring added value
  • articulate how meeting this objective will also contribute delivery of ‘Recommendation four: Act on behalf of the LPS community and catalyse new cross-community activities’ as stated in the PRUK Prospectus
  • describe how CLOSER will collaborate with existing or new data infrastructures (including those funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and others) that support access to social science and biomedical data, where CLOSER has expertise

To build capacity your application should:

  • include training activities which build professional and research capacity and skills in the management, conduct, analysis and impact of longitudinal studies; working in collaboration with stakeholders across the data and infrastructure landscape as appropriate to advance the quality, quantity and impact of social science research and ensuring that training provisions address a clear need for the community. This should also include continued improvement and innovation of the learning hub, while continuing to develop innovative ways of ensuring the future development and long-term sustainability of the UK’s LPS
  • carefully detail how the proposed training will address specific capacity-building needs around LPS, and capacity building measures should be monitored and assessed. Learning from existing methodological and capacity-building approaches should be utilised
  • articulate how meeting this objective will also contribute delivery of ‘Recommendation five: Build capacity and skills in data management and practices, as stated in the PRUK Prospectus’

Delivery of Masters or PhD training programmes is not permitted, however ‘masterclasses’ or short training courses in the skills and methodological areas which the team has, or can bring together, distinctive expertise are in scope. This will complement and add value to the activities of the individual studies and the wider community of researchers with which the team engages.

To maximise impact, public affairs and policy engagement your application should:

  • articulate how research findings based on data from LPS will have the maximum instrumental impact and be utilised by policy makers (government and non-governmental) and practitioners to inform decision making
  • indicate how impact and public and policy engagement activities will improve the visibility of longitudinal data and evidence to broad audiences, including academics across different disciplines, policy makers and parliamentarians
  • detail how you will work collaboratively for policy-engagement, and outline plans for proactively taking advantage of opportunities to represent and champion LPS in the policy landscape mobilising LPS data and research findings
  • indicate how you envisage raising awareness of and engendering public support for participation in the major longitudinal studies
  • articulate how policy engagement activities will deliver CLOSER directly, but can also indicate how policy engagement activities could support the wider data landscape and existing or new data infrastructure initiatives

Plan for the future: implementing ESRC’s strategies and ensuring legacy of CLOSER’s work. Your application should:

  • articulate how CLOSER will consolidate and embed learning to date by working collaboratively to transfer knowledge and some functions that are no longer a core aim for CLOSER ensuring legacy value while operating flexibly and responding to evolving the data and Infrastructure landscape. This must include:
    • long term value from knowledge in data harmonisation and linkage is embedded and shared; ensuring legacy will require sharing learning about the processes of harmonisation and data linkage
    • an outline of how CLOSER envisages consolidating progress/learning to date with data harmonisation and linkage and how they plan to reduce activity in this area, handing over functions in a timely manner as the data infrastructure landscape evolves
    • how LPS can make developments in a co-ordinated manner in areas where the CLOSER team has particular knowledge or expertise, pro-actively contributing and where appropriate leading initiatives and collaborations
    • the contribution to the ESRC Data Infrastructure Strategy and wider UKRI strategy.  Reference to other activities as required should be made, such as relevant initiatives including, Future Data Services, Longitudinal Linkage Consortium and so on is encouraged
    • describe how longevity of value added by CLOSER beyond the duration of the grant will be achieved

Strategic Leadership

It is expected that CLOSER will continue to have a strategic leadership role in the LPS landscape. CLOSER is expected to engage with the ESRC’s Future Data Services review and follow-on activities and other strategic activities such as ESRC’s ongoing work to build social science capacity for data-driven research, the development and delivery of aspects of Population Research UK.

Your application should state how CLOSER will intend to work collaboratively with a range of key stakeholders, including the PRUK Hub and other PRUK delivery partners. Strategic partnership will be required with a range of organisations within the wider research data management environment that both fund the production of and provide access to data.

Institutional Support

We are expecting strong institutional commitment and practical contributions to hosting the Service. A statement of institutional commitment will need to be included in your application and should be appropriate for the level of funding being requested.

Governance and Monitoring

The host institution is expected to demonstrate that suitable governance and advisory structures are in place to ensure appropriate oversight of CLOSER’s performance and delivery. This should include a formal risk governance framework, including active project and risk management with appropriate oversight and a system of delegated responsibility and accountability.

The proposal should include detail, with dates, the key forecast milestones and outputs in delivering on the overall objectives within the application, clearly noting where activities will be covered by the core budget vs discretional innovation funds. Following the provisional award of a grant, these milestones and procedures will be agreed with ESRC via the grant terms and conditions. In reference to the aims and objectives stated above, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) will be agreed. These will be precise and verifiable (activity-based and output-based) and reflect the proposed key deliverables as indicated in the full proposal that will be achieved during the funding period. This will help form the basis for assessing progress. ESRC also expect investments to present impact returns at agreed, regular reporting points, which show how activities carried out have led to change. How to identify, measure and monitor impacts will be agreed after the grant has been issued.

Following the provisional award of a grant, the reporting procedures including milestones, KPIs and impacts will be agreed with ESRC via the grant terms and conditions. Requirements regarding monitoring, reporting and governance will be set out in the terms and conditions of the grant between ESRC and the grant recipient; these will include a short annual report, timing, and structure to be agreed with ESRC.

CLOSER will also be required to regularly meet with ESRC and undertake monitoring and evaluation activities as set out by the ESRC Data Infrastructure Strategy.  As a minimum, this includes providing ESRC with a quarterly highlight report that outlines progress towards meeting objectives, issues or risks and achievements.

ESRC will arrange an independent Mid-Term Review of CLOSER, anticipated in 2026.

During this time, the PRUK Programme Board will assist ESRC by reviewing the effectiveness of CLOSER’s contribution to the delivery of the PRUK Prospectus recommendations, and whether CLOSER should continue to deliver PRUK services beyond 2028.

Duration

The duration of this award is four years (48 months).

Funding available

The full economic cost (FEC) of your project can be up to £7,000,000.

ESRC will fund 80% of the FEC.

How to apply

Do not apply to this funding opportunity unless you have been invited to do so.

We are running this funding opportunity on the new UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service. You cannot apply on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system.

The project lead is responsible for completing the application process on the Funding Service, but we expect all team members and project partners to contribute to the application.

Only the lead research organisation can submit an application to UKRI.

To apply

Select ‘Start application’ near the beginning of this Funding finder page.

  1. Confirm you are the project lead.
  2. Sign in or create a Funding Service account. To create an account, select your organisation, verify your email address, and set a password. If your organisation is not listed, email support@funding-service.ukri.org
  3. Answer questions directly in the text boxes. You can save your answers and come back to complete them or work offline and return to copy and paste your answers. If we need you to upload a document, follow the upload instructions in the Funding Service. All questions and assessment criteria are listed in the ‘How to apply’ section on this Funding finder page.
  4. Allow enough time to check your application in ‘read-only’ view before sending to your research office.
  5. Send the completed application to your research office for checking. They will return it to you if it needs editing.
  6. Your research office will submit the completed and checked application to UKRI.

Watch our research office webinars about the new Funding Service.

For more guidance on the Funding Service, see:

Deadline

ESRC must receive your application by 4 January 2024 at 4.00pm UK time.

You will not be able to apply after this time.

Make sure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines.

Following the submission of your application to the funding opportunity, your application cannot be changed, and applications will not be returned for amendment. If your application does not follow the guidance, it may be rejected.

Personal data

Processing personal data

ESRC, as part of UKRI, will need to collect some personal information to manage your Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications.

We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.

Publication of outcomes

ESRC will publish the outcomes of this funding opportunity at What ESRC has funded.

If your application is successful, we will publish some personal information on the UKRI Gateway to Research.

Summary

Word limit: maximum 550

In plain English, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application.

We may make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, so make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example:

  • opinion-formers
  • policymakers
  • the public
  • the wider research community

Guidance for writing a summary

Clearly describe your proposed work in terms of:

Core team

List the key members of your team and assign them roles from the following:

  • project lead (PL)
  • project co-lead (UK) (PcL)
  • project co-lead (international) (PcL (I))
  • specialist
  • grant manager
  • professional enabling staff
  • research and innovation associate
  • technician
  • visiting researcher

Only list one individual as project lead.

Find out more about UKRI’s core team roles in funding applications.

Vision

Word limit: 500

What are you hoping to achieve with your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how your proposed work:

  • is of excellent quality and importance within or beyond the fields or areas
  • has the potential to advance current understanding, or generate new knowledge, thinking or discovery within or beyond the field or area
  • is timely given current trends, context, and needs
  • impacts world-leading research, society, the economy, or the environment

Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. If using visual elements, you must:

  • use images sparingly and only to convey important information that cannot easily be put into words
  • insert each new image onto a new line
  • provide a descriptive legend for each image immediately underneath it (this counts towards your word limit)
  • files must be smaller than 8MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format

Approach

Word limit: 3,000

How are you going to deliver your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how you have designed your approach so that it:

  • is effective and appropriate to achieve your objectives
  • is feasible, and comprehensively identifies any risks to delivery and how they will be managed
  • summarises the previous work and describes how this will be built upon and progressed
  • will maximise translation of outputs into outcomes and impacts
  • describes how your, and if applicable your team’s, research environment (in terms of the place and relevance to the project) will contribute to the success of the work

Within the Approach section we also expect you to:

  • clearly set out how you plan to meet the requirements of each objective in the Scope
  • provide a detailed and comprehensive plan for delivery, including goals, key forecast milestones, outputs and timelines on the overall objectives, clearly noting where activities will be covered by the core budget vs discretional innovation funds. This can be in the form of a diagram or chart, if you wish
  • summarise how CLOSER will monitor and report on progress in a manner aligned to key milestones and the processes that will be put in place to recognise and deal with challenges in meeting the delivery timetable
  • provide a description of the governance structure, including leadership roles, project management staffing or structures, and clear lines of accountability and responsibility

A list of references used to support your application can be added in the ‘References’ question.

Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. If using visual elements, you must:

  • use images sparingly and only to convey important information that cannot easily be put into words
  • insert each new image onto a new line
  • provide a descriptive legend for each image immediately underneath it (this counts towards your word limit)
  • files must be smaller than 8MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format

Applicant and team capability to deliver

Word limit: 1,500

Why are you the right individual or team to successfully deliver the proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Evidence of how you, and if relevant your team, have:

  • the relevant experience (appropriate to career stage) to deliver the proposed work
  • the right balance of skills and expertise to cover the proposed work
  • the appropriate leadership and management skills to deliver the work and your approach to develop others
  • contributed to developing a positive research environment and wider community

The word count for this section is 1,500 words, 1,000 words to be used for R4RI modules and, if necessary, a further 500 words for Additions.

Use the Résumé for Research and Innovation (R4RI) format to showcase the range of relevant skills you and, if relevant, your team (project and project co-leads, researchers, technicians, specialists, partners and so on) have and how this will help deliver the proposed work. You can include individuals’ specific achievements but only choose past contributions that best evidence their ability to deliver this work.

Complete this section using the R4RI module headings listed. Use each heading once and include a response for the whole team, see the UKRI guidance on R4RI. You should consider how to balance your answer, and emphasise where appropriate the key skills each team member brings:

  • contributions to the generation of new ideas, tools, methodologies, or knowledge
  • the development of others and maintenance of effective working relationships
  • contributions to the wider research and innovation community
  • contributions to broader research or innovation users and audiences and towards wider societal benefit

Additions

Provide any further details relevant to your application. This section is optional and can be up to 500 words. You should not use it to describe additional skills, experiences, or outputs, but you can use it to describe any factors that provide context for the rest of your R4RI (for example, details of career breaks if you wish to disclose them).

Complete this as a narrative. Do not format it like a CV.

UKRI has introduced new role types for funding opportunities being run on the new Funding Service.

For full details, see Eligibility as an individual.

Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. If using visual elements, you must:

  • use images sparingly and only to convey important information that cannot easily be put into words
  • insert each new image onto a new line
  • provide a descriptive legend for each image immediately underneath it (this counts towards your word limit)
  • files must be smaller than 8MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format

Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)

Word limit: 500

What are the ethical or RRI implications and issues relating to the proposed work? If you do not think that the proposed work raises any ethical or RRI issues, explain why.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Demonstrate that you have identified and evaluated:

  • the relevant ethical or responsible research and innovation considerations
  • how you will manage these considerations

All proposals have to comply with the ESRC Framework for Research Ethics which includes guidance for applicants and links to related web resources.

All necessary ethical approvals must be in place before the project commences, but do not need to have been secured at the time of application.

If you are not generating data and have not completed the ‘Data management’ question you should address any legal or ethical considerations relating to your use of data here.

Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. If using visual elements, you must:

  • use images sparingly and only to convey important information that cannot easily be put into words
  • insert each new image onto a new line
  • provide a descriptive legend for each image immediately underneath it (this counts towards your word limit)
  • files must be smaller than 8MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format

Resources and cost justification

Word limit: 1,000

What will you need to deliver your proposed work and how much will it cost?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Justify the application’s more costly resources, in particular:

  • project staff
  • significant travel for field work or collaboration (but not regular travel between collaborating organisations or to conferences)
  • any equipment that will cost more than £10,000
  • any consumables beyond typical requirements, or that are required in exceptional quantities
  • all facilities and infrastructure costs
  • all resources that have been costed as ‘Exceptions’

Assessors are not looking for detailed costs or a line-by-line breakdown of all project resources. Overall, they want you to demonstrate how the resources you anticipate needing for your proposed work:

  • are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
  • represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
  • maximise potential outcomes and impacts

For detailed guidance on eligible costs please see the ESRC Research Funding Guide.

Your organisation’s support

Word limit: 10

Provide details of support from your research organisation.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Provide a Statement of Support from your research organisation detailing the practical contributions to hosting CLOSER. This should include details of any matched funding that will be provided to support the activity and any additional support that might add value to CLOSER.

The assessment panel will be looking for a strong statement of commitment from your research organisation.

ESRC recognises that in some instances, this information may be provided by the Research Office, the Technology Transfer Office (TTO) or equivalent, or a combination of both.

You must also include the following details:

  • a significant person’s name and their position, from the TTO or Research Office, or both
  • office address or web link

Upload details are provided within the service on the actual application.

References

Word limit: 1,000

List the references you have used to support your application.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Include all references in this section, not in the rest of the application questions.

You should not include any other information in this section.

We advise you not to include hyperlinks, as assessors are not obliged to access the information they lead to or consider it in their assessment of your application.

If linking to web resources, to maintain the information’s integrity, include persistent identifiers (such as digital object identifiers) where possible.

You must not include links to web resources to extend your application.

How we will assess your application

Assessment process

We will assess your application using the following process.

Panel and interview

We will convene an independent panel of experts to assess the quality of your application. If the application meets the minimum quality threshold, the expert panel will conduct an interview with applicants There will be an opportunity to respond to the panel’s assessments at the interview. The panel will then make a funding recommendation to ESRC.

We expect the panel meeting and interview to be held in early to mid-February 2024.

Feedback

We will give feedback with the outcome of your application.

Principles of assessment

We support the San Francisco declaration on research assessment and recognise the relationship between research assessment and research integrity.

Find out about the UKRI Principles of Assessment and Decision Making.

We reserve the right to modify the assessment process as needed.

Assessment criteria

Panel members will use the criteria for the following questions, set out in the ‘How to apply’ section:

  • vision
  • approach
  • applicant and team capability to deliver
  • ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)
  • resources and cost justification
  • your organisation’s support
  • references

Find details of assessment questions and criteria under the ‘Application questions’ heading in the ‘How to apply’ section.

Contact details

Get help with your application

Important note: the Helpdesk is committed to helping users of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service as effectively and as quickly as possible. In order to manage cases at peak volume times, the Helpdesk will triage and prioritise those queries with an imminent opportunity deadline or a technical issue. Enquiries raised where information is available on the Funding Finder opportunity page and should be understood early in the application process (for example, regarding eligibility or content/remit of an opportunity) will not constitute a priority case and will be addressed as soon as possible.

Contact Details

For help and advice on costings and writing your proposal please contact your research office in the first instance, allowing sufficient time for your organisation’s submission process.

For questions related to this specific funding opportunity please contact datainfrastructure@esrc.ukri.org

Any queries regarding the system or the submission of applications through the Funding Service should be directed to the helpdesk.

Email: support@funding-service.ukri.org

Phone: 01793 547490

Our phone lines are open:

  • Monday to Thursday 8:30am to 5:00pm
  • Friday 8:30am to 4:30pm

To help us process queries quicker, we request that users highlight the council and opportunity name in the subject title of their email query, include the application reference number, and refrain from contacting more than one mailbox at a time.

You can also find information on submitting an application.

Sensitive information

If you or a core team member need to tell us something you wish to remain confidential, email datainfrastructure@esrc.ukri.org

Include in the subject line: the funding opportunity title; sensitive information; your Funding Service application number.

Typical examples of confidential information include:

  • individual is unavailable until a certain date (for example due to parental leave)
  • declaration of interest
  • additional information about eligibility to apply that would not be appropriately shared in the ‘Applicant and team capability’ section
  • conflict of interest for UKRI to consider in reviewer or panel participant selection
  • the application is an invited resubmission

For information about how UKRI handles personal data, read UKRI’s privacy notice.

Additional info

Supporting documents

Equality impact assessment (PDF, 46KB)
CLOSER background (PDF, 158KB)

Research disruption due to COVID-19

We recognise that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused major interruptions and disruptions across our communities. We are committed to ensuring that individual applicants and their wider team, including partners and networks, are not penalised for any disruption to their career, such as:

  • breaks and delays
  • disruptive working patterns and conditions
  • the loss of ongoing work
  • role changes that may have been caused by the pandemic

Panel members will be advised to consider the unequal impacts that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the capability to deliver and career development of those individuals included in the application. They will be asked to consider the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the work they are proposing.

Where disruptions have occurred, you can highlight this within your application if you wish, but there is no requirement to detail the specific circumstances that caused the disruption.

This is the website for UKRI: our seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help improve our online products and services.