Funding opportunity

Funding opportunity: Gambling harms research grants

Start application

Apply for funding that deepens understanding or supports solutions for the prevention and treatment of gambling-related harms.

To lead an application, you must be based at a research organisation eligible for UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) funding.

This funding opportunity is open to research communities across all UKRI research councils. Interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary approaches are encouraged.

The full economic cost (FEC) of your project can be up to £2 million, for up to three years.

UKRI will fund 80% of the FEC.

Who can apply

This opportunity is open to organisations with standard eligibility. Project leads must be based at a UK research institution eligible for UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) funding. Check if your organisation is eligible.

Teams may involve single or multiple institutions. The lead organisation will be responsible for submitting the grant application.

Researchers may submit one application to this funding opportunity as project lead but may be involved in other applications as a project co-lead.

Who is eligible to apply

This funding opportunity is open to research communities across all UKRI research councils. It is a UKRI funding opportunity, delivered by Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC).

To lead the award, your organisation must have standard eligibility for UKRI funding, which include:

  • UK higher education providers (HEPs)
  • UKRI institutes
  • independent research organisations approved by UKRI
  • public sector research establishments or NHS bodies approved by UKRI

This funding opportunity is also open to the following organisations with non-standard eligibility to apply as a project co-lead, provided they can demonstrate the capacity to co-lead and manage a significant research and innovation project:

  • international research organisations
  • other educational establishments
  • charities and third sector organisations
  • government departments and non-governmental organisations
  • social enterprises and UK registered businesses

Further guidance for including UK project co-leads from organisations with non-standard eligibility is provided in the ESRC Project co-leads from UK business, third sector or government organisations policy. These organisations will need to go through due diligence checks before being awarded funding. Further details can be found on how to apply to be an eligible organisation.

It is the responsibility of the lead research organisation to check eligibility of all collaborating organisations (UK and international) and the eligibility of individuals for their proposed roles. Applications submitted with ineligible applicants will be rejected by the UKRI office.

See AHRC’s funding guide for further information on institutional and individual contractual eligibility requirements for applicants.

These organisations can also contribute as project partners if they are not a project co-lead. For more information see the Collaborators section.

Further eligibility requirements

Applications must be team based and must bring together diverse people, expertise, experiences, places and wider stakeholders. This includes people with lived and learned experience from gambling and gambling related harms.
By lived experience, we mean people with direct experience of gambling related harms.

Partnerships with non-academic higher education institutions and people across the third sector, community groups, industry, the public sector, people with lived experience and the public are important. These kinds of collaborations can strengthen the diversity, innovation and potential for impact from research activities.

By ‘industry’ we mean any enterprise that places goods or services on a market and whose commercial activities constitute more than 20% of its annual operations. This definition applies across all sectors and is not limited to organisations within the gambling industry. However, there are sensitivities with respect to partnerships with businesses, the gambling industry or otherwise, meaning additional care should be taken to manage risks and potential conflicts of interest.

Any engagement with industry partners, especially those from the gambling sector, must be demonstrably independent, evidence-based and research-led. Engagement must align with the programme’s public interest objectives to further understanding of gambling-related harms and should be discussed with UKRI prior to submission of an application via the UKRI RPG inbox: RPGinfo@ahrc.ukri.org

All applications will be subject to robust scrutiny through our expert review and governance processes. Particular attention will be paid to the independence and integrity of the research, the source and independence of the findings and the potential for real-world impact in understanding gambling behaviour and reducing gambling harms.

We wish to clarify that, as well as not being permitted to host awards, under the Research Programme on Gambling, UKRI does not permit funding to be provided to Gambling Commission licence holders who are subject to the levy.
Co-funding from Gambling Commission license holder is not permitted. Furthermore, we would not expect individual researchers to concurrently hold funding from licence holders subject to the levy while receiving funding from the Research Programme on Gambling.

We do not permit engagement with industries whose core business can be associated with harm to public health or societal wellbeing, in line with our ethical standards and harms-based exclusion principles. This includes the gambling industry.

Exceptions may be made for time-limited, purpose-specific interactions deemed essential to achieving legitimate and high-quality research objectives (for example, access to proprietary datasets or materials), provided that:

  • there is no direct funding or co-authorship from the excluded entity
  • the interaction is subject to robust ethical review and declared transparently
  • appropriate safeguards are in place to prevent undue influence, reputational risk or conflicts of interest
  • the public benefit of the research demonstrably outweighs the risks of engagement

Such exceptions must be approved in advance through our due diligence and governance mechanisms. You should consider our policies and guidance on Preventing harm in research when preparing applications to this funding opportunity.

An indication of required datasets, sources or both, must be included in the application. Where access to data has been established or agreed in principle, this must be confirmed via letters of support from relevant data controllers or data services. Any relevant data gaps or needs should be highlighted, and plans for addressing them outlined.

You should declare in the declaration of interest section of your application that you are compliant with these requirements for the duration of the programme.

Collaborations can take different forms including project partners or collaborating organisations. You must demonstrate how the collaborations within your team are equitable, have contributed to the development of your application including its conceptualisation, are not compromised by non-compliance with our conflict of interest policy, and will help the centre achieve its aims.

Collaborators

You may have collaborators on your project in addition to those listed in the core team.

Project partners

A project partner is defined as a third-party person or organisation (including international or non-academic collaborations) who provides specific contributions to the team and project.

Project partners are expected to provide contributions to the delivery of the project, either in cash or in kind, and should not therefore be seeking to claim funds from UKRI.

Organisations that are applicants on the project, including any named applicants’ organisations, cannot also be a project partner. UKRI head office staff acting in their capacity as a UKRI employee are not eligible to be project partners.

Project subcontractor

A project subcontractor is defined as a third-party individual who is not employed as staff on the grant, who is subcontracted by a participating organisation to deliver a specific piece of work. Subcontractors will be allowed in line with UKRI terms and conditions for research grants.

Management of intellectual property

In your application you will be expected to outline how outputs and intellectual property assets will be managed across the organisations within your core team and collaborators. This is to ensure that it is appropriate for this funding and ensures outputs can be used to support the wider aims of the levy.

International researchers

UKRI’s international project co-lead policy applies to this funding opportunity. If you are a researcher based outside of the UK, you can be named as ‘project co-lead (international)’ if you meet the eligibility criteria for international project co-leads.

The UK research organisation which hosts the project lead will be responsible for the due diligence and confirming that any international organisation and project co-lead meets the eligibility criteria. Further information on the eligibility criteria for international research organisations is provided in the UKRI project co-lead (international) policy and guidance.

Current co-funding arrangements via international lead agency agreements with individual research councils do not apply to this funding opportunity.

Equality, diversity and inclusion

We are committed to achieving equality of opportunity for all funding applicants. We encourage applications from a diverse range of researchers.

We support people to work in a way that suits their personal circumstances. This includes:

  • career breaks
  • support for people with caring responsibilities
  • flexible working
  • alternative working patterns

UKRI can offer disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders during the application and assessment process.

What we're looking for

Demand management

Demand management is not currently being applied to this funding opportunity.

UKRI encourages organisations to support applicants in preparing well-planned, high-quality applications that are competitive for funding relative to the funding opportunity.

See AHRC funding guide for further information on submission rules.

Scope

Context

In April 2023, the Department for Culture, Media, and Sports (DCMS) published a white paper setting out the government’s plans for modernising regulation of the gambling sector. One of the key proposals in the white paper is the introduction of a statutory levy on gambling operators.

Following a public consultation, which ran from 17 October 2023 to 14 December 2023, and an analysis of the responses to the consultation, the government has introduced a statutory levy charged to all licenced gambling activity. This is at varying levels depending on the sector and nature of the gambling activity to ensure impacts are proportionate.

The statutory levy was introduced via secondary legislation and commenced in April 2025 with funding flowing later that year. The levy will be collected and administered by the Gambling Commission under the strategic direction of the government, replacing the current system of voluntary industry contributions.

Levy funding will be directed in specific proportions for the purposes of research, prevention, and treatment. Each stream of the levy system will also have a central commissioner. The streams are:

  • research (20% of funding to UKRI and the Gambling Commission for the establishment of a bespoke research programme)
  • prevention (30% of funding to the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities  to create a co-ordinated GB-wide approach to prevention)
  • treatment (50% of funding to the NHS in England, Scotland, and Wales to commission treatment and support services)

Within the stream of funding allocated to UKRI for the new Research Programme on Gambling (RPG), UKRI have commissioned a multi-disciplinary Gambling Harms Research UK (GHR-UK) Evidence Centre.

This will coordinate a cohort of GHR-UK Innovation Partnerships that have been funded to fill gaps in the existing evidence base and assist us in developing a research agenda following the introduction of the levy.

For more information on the background of this funding opportunity, go to the Additional information section.

Gambling harms research grants

This funding opportunity aims to deliver high-quality research projects and build capacity in the research ecosystem. We welcome applications addressing any question or challenge that deepens understanding or supports solutions for the prevention and treatment of gambling-related harms.

This funding opportunity is open to the research and innovation communities across all UKRI research councils, and interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary approaches are encouraged.

We will take a managed portfolio approach to ensure a balance of research topics and geographic regions are represented across the programme.

Interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches

We encourage research projects to bring together different disciplines to address a challenge or question in gambling harms research, either through an interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary approach. Single discipline projects will also be considered.

Definitions

Interdisciplinary research combines distinct components of two or more disciplines through the integration of separate disciplinary data, methods, tools, concepts or theories in order to address a complex issue, question or problem. Interdisciplinary projects will be co-created or co-designed with input from all disciplines involved and the disciplines genuinely integrated with each discipline gaining something significant by being part of the project.

Multidisciplinary research involves different disciplines working towards the same challenge. The work packages do not require integration and remain largely separate and independent of each other, with the outputs of each combining to address the research challenge.

Whether your project uses an interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary or single discipline approach, you should clearly articulate throughout your application how the challenge can only be addressed through your chosen approach. You should include the appropriate measures for team management and project governance to ensure a successful outcome.

Guidance

Strong interdisciplinary projects demonstrate active integration of concepts, methods and perspectives across all participating disciplines. Integration is intentional, supported by clear processes for communication and shared working. Teams work jointly rather than in parallel, managing differences in disciplinary languages or culture to ensure equitable involvement across all fields. Methodologies, tools and processes may need to be adapted in order to integrate the different disciplines.

Effective interdisciplinary projects are co-created from the outset, with all disciplines contributing to shaping the research question, project framing and design. Teams build shared understanding through early collaborative discussion, valuing and challenging each other’s expertise. The project is guided by collective goals rather than any single discipline, supported by governance and working practices that foster open dialogue and ongoing development.

Interdisciplinary research should deliver meaningful reciprocal benefits for all participating disciplines, enriching each field’s knowledge base through new insights, methods or perspectives.

Guidance for effective interdisciplinary research approaches was initially developed for the UKRI Cross research council responsive mode pilot scheme. Further guidance can be viewed in a webinar recording for the second round of the scheme, particularly from the 10:45 timestamp.

In multidisciplinary research approaches the disciplinary methods and processes remain largely unchanged but the outputs of each disciplinary workstream will come together to address the research challenge.

For both multi and interdisciplinary approaches the team should put in place the appropriate management and governance structures to ensure a successful outcome and outline these in their application. Research approaches should also consider the cross-disciplinary support and development for early career researchers through mentoring, skills exchanges and opportunities to engage with approaches across disciplines.

Research ethics

You must ensure that the activities and research is carried out to a high ethical standard, particularly given the sensitivities of research on issues concerning public harm and health. Gambling and the themes and topics highlighted have the potential to be very sensitive and you are expected to have carefully considered all potential issues, integrity and conflicts of interest, safeguarding requirements, and best practice.

You must clearly state how any potential ethical, safeguarding, and health and safety issues have been considered and will be addressed, ensuring that all necessary ethical approval is in place and all risks are minimised before the award commences. This is particularly important in the context of any planned public engagement activity and the involvement of people with lived experience, both of which may require specific consideration.

We encourage applicants to make use of relevant resources on UKRI’s Good Research Resource Hub.

Duration

The duration of this award is three years.

Awards are expected to be offered in April 2027. Projects must start by 1 October 2027.

Funding available

The FEC of your project can be up to £2 million.

UKRI will fund 80% of the FEC.

What we will fund

Costs for project leads and UK project co-leads with standard eligibility can include:

  • contributions to the salary of project lead and co-leads
  • staff costs
  • equipment
  • travel and subsistence
  • other directly incurred costs
  • estates and indirect costs

Doctoral students are not eligible for this funding opportunity, and funds are not available for PhD studentships. Further details about eligible costings for organisations with standard eligibility can be found in the AHRC research funding guide.

For organisations with non-standard eligibility, UKRI will award funding to the UK lead organisation, who will be responsible for distributing funds. Justified costs will be funded at 100% FEC and should be included under exceptions.

Further guidance on costings for project co-leads from UK organisations with non-standard eligibility is provided in the ESRC Project co-leads from UK business, third sector or government organisations policy.

For international organisations, further information on eligible costs is provided in the UKRI project co-lead (international) policy and guidance.

The combined total costs claimed for by all organisations with non-standard eligibility (both overseas and from the UK) must not exceed 30% of the overall cost of the project, calculated at 100% FEC.

This limit only applies to costs associated with co-project leads and does not restrict your ability to extend further support to enable participation through, for example, funding travel costs for participants. However, these additional costs would be funded at the standard 80% FEC.

Supporting skills and talent

We expect you to follow the principles of the Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers and the Technician Commitment. You are also expected to comply with our statement of expectations for technology and skills specialists (PDF, 31KB).

You are encouraged to consider how you can use a range of technical and specialist expertise available at your research organisation to deliver the proposed work and to mitigate against risks presented by fixed term contracts.

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I)

UKRI is committed in ensuring that effective international collaboration in research and innovation takes place with integrity and within strong ethical frameworks. Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I) is a UKRI work programme designed to help protect all those working in our thriving and collaborative international sector by enabling partnerships to be as open as possible, and as secure as necessary. Our TR&I Principles set out UKRI’s expectations of organisations funded by UKRI in relation to due diligence for international collaboration.

As such, applicants for UKRI funding may be asked to demonstrate how their proposed projects will comply with our approach and expectation towards TR&I, identifying potential risks and the relevant controls you will put in place to help proportionately reduce these risks.

See further guidance and information about TR&I, including where applicants can find additional support.

How to apply

We are running this funding opportunity on the new UKRI Funding Service so please ensure that your organisation is registered. You cannot apply on the Joint Electronic Submissions system.

The project lead is responsible for completing the application process on the Funding Service, but we expect all team members and project partners to contribute to the application.

Only the lead research organisation can submit an application to UKRI.

To apply

Select ‘Start application’ near the beginning of this Funding finder page.

  1. Confirm you are the project lead.
  2. Sign in or create a Funding Service account. To create an account, select your organisation, verify your email address, and set a password.
  3. Answer questions directly in the text boxes. You can save your answers and come back to complete them or work offline and return to copy and paste your answers. If we need you to upload a document, follow the upload instructions in the Funding Service. All questions and assessment criteria are listed in the How to apply section on this Funding finder page.
  4. Allow enough time to check your application in ‘read-only’ view before sending to your research office.
  5. Send the completed application to your research office for checking. They will return it to you if it needs editing.
  6. Your research office will submit the completed and checked application to UKRI.

Please be aware that research office and finance teams undertake checks on hosting arrangements and financial eligibility. The ultimate responsibility for ensuring compliance with all opportunity requirements lies with the applicant.

Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant.

When including images, you must:

  • provide a descriptive caption or legend for each image immediately underneath it in the text box (this must be outside the image and counts towards your word limit)
  • insert each new image on a new line
  • use files smaller than 5MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format

Images should only be used to convey important visual information that cannot easily be put into words. The following are not permitted, and your application will be rejected if you include:

  • sentences or paragraphs of text
  • tables
  • excessive quantities of images

A few words are permitted where the image would lack clarity without the contextual words, such as a diagram, where text labels are required for an axis or graph column.

For more guidance on the Funding Service, see:

References

References should be included within the word count of the appropriate question section. You should use your discretion when including references and prioritise those most pertinent to the application.

Hyperlinks can be used in reference information. When including references, you should consider how your references will be viewed and used by the assessors, ensuring that:

  • references are easily identifiable by the assessors
  • references are formatted as appropriate to your research
  • persistent identifiers are used where possible

General use of hyperlinks

Applications should be self-contained. You should only use hyperlinks to link directly to reference information. You must not include links to web resources to extend your application. Assessors are not required to access links to conduct assessment or recommend a funding decision.

Generative artificial intelligence (AI)

Use of generative AI tools to prepare funding applications is permitted, however, caution should be applied.

For more information see our policy on the use of generative AI in application and assessment.

Deadline

UKRI must receive your application by 8 December 2026 at 4:00pm UK time. You will not be able to apply after this time.

Make sure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines.

Following the submission of your application to this funding opportunity, your application cannot be changed, and submitted applications will not be amended. If your application does not follow the guidance, it may be rejected.

Personal data

Processing personal data

UKRI will need to collect some personal information to manage your Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications.

We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.

We will need to share the application (including any personal information that it contains) with the Department for Culture, Media, and Sports (DCMS) so that they can participate in the assessment process.

For more information on how DCMS uses personal information, visit the DCMS personal information charter for further detail.

Sensitive information

If you or a core team member need to tell us something you wish to remain confidential, email operations@ahrc.ukri.org

Include in the subject line: [Gambling harms research grants; sensitive information; your Funding Service application number].

Typical examples of confidential information include:

  • individual is unavailable until a certain date (for example due to parental leave)
  • declaration of interest
  • additional information about eligibility to apply that would not be appropriately shared in the ‘Applicant and team capability’ section
  • conflict of interest for UKRI to consider in reviewer or panel participant selection
  • the application is an invited resubmission

For information about how UKRI handles personal data, read UKRI’s privacy notice.

Institutional matched funding

There is no requirement for matched funding from the institutions hosting the project lead, project co-leads or other staff employed on the application, beyond the standard 20% FEC. Expert reviewers and panels assessing UKRI funding applications must not consider levels of institutional matched funding as a factor on which to base recommendations. Direct and in-kind contributions from third party project partners are encouraged.

This policy does not remove the need for support from host organisations who must provide the necessary research environment and infrastructure for award-specific activities funded by UKRI. For example, research facilities, training and development of staff.

Publication of outcomes

UKRI will publish the outcomes of this funding opportunity at What AHRC has funded.

If your application is successful, we will publish some personal information on the UKRI Gateway to Research.

Summary

Word limit: 550

In plain English, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application.

We usually make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, therefore do not include any confidential or sensitive information. Make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example:

  • opinion-formers
  • policymakers
  • the public
  • the wider research community

Guidance for writing a summary

Clearly describe your proposed work in terms of:

  • context
  • the challenge the project addresses
  • aims and objectives
  • potential applications and benefits

Core team

List the key members of your team and assign them roles from the following:

  • project lead (PL)
  • project co-lead (UK) (PcL)
  • project co-lead (international) (PcL (I))
  • specialist
  • grant manager
  • professional enabling staff
  • research and innovation associate
  • technician
  • visiting researcher
  • researcher co-lead (RcL)

Only list one individual as project lead.

UKRI has introduced a new addition to the ‘Specialist’ role type. Public contributors such as people with lived experience can now be added to an application.

Find out more about UKRI’s core team roles in funding applications.

Application questions

Vision

Word limit: 500

What are you hoping to achieve with your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how your proposed work:

  • is of excellent quality and importance within or beyond the field(s) or area(s)
  • has the potential to advance current understanding, or generate new knowledge, thinking or discovery within or beyond the field or area
  • is timely given current trends, context, and needs
  • impacts world-leading research, society, the economy, or the environment
  • identifies potential beneficiaries and users of the proposed research, including the relevance of the research to these beneficiaries

Within the Vision section we also expect you to:

  • clearly state the research challenge in understanding, preventing, or treating gambling-related harms that the project will address
  • demonstrate how the proposed research will contribute to the development of a robust, independent evidence base on gambling-related harms.

References may be included within this section.

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Approach

Word limit: 2,500

How are you going to deliver your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how you have designed your approach so that it:

  • is effective and appropriate to achieve your objectives
  • is feasible, and comprehensively identifies any risks to delivery and how they will be managed
  • uses a clearly written and transparent methodology (if applicable)
  • summarises the previous work and describes how this will be built upon and progressed (if applicable)
  • will maximise translation of outputs into outcomes and impacts
  • describes how your, and if applicable your team’s, research environment (in terms of the place and relevance to the project) will contribute to the success of the work

Within the Approach section we also expect you to:

  • explain why your chosen research approach is the most appropriate way to address the research challenge
  • explain how your ways of working, management arrangements and governance structures are appropriate to support the successful delivery of the research
  • describe how people with relevant lived and learned experience, and other key stakeholders, will be appropriately involved in the design and delivery of the research
  • describe how potential conflicts of interest have been identified and will be managed throughout the project

If you are planning to generate data as part of your grant, you must complete the separate Data management question.

References may be included within this section.

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Applicant and team capability to deliver

Word limit: 1,650

Why are you the right individual or team to successfully deliver the proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Evidence of how you, and if relevant your team, have:

  • the relevant experience (appropriate to career stage) to deliver the proposed work
  • the right balance of skills and expertise to cover the proposed work
  • the appropriate leadership and management skills to deliver the work and your approach to develop others
  • contributed to developing a positive research environment and wider community

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

The word limit for this section is 1,650 words: 1,150 words to be used for Résumé for Research and Innovation (R4RI) modules (including references) and, if necessary, a further 500 words for Additions.

Use the R4RI format to showcase the range of relevant skills you and, if relevant, your team (project lead and project co-leads, researchers, technicians, specialists, partners and so on) have and how this will help deliver the proposed work. You can include individuals’ specific achievements but only choose past contributions that best evidence their ability to deliver this work.

Complete this section using the R4RI module headings listed. Use each heading once and include a response for the whole team, see the UKRI guidance on R4RI. You should consider how to balance your answer, and emphasise where appropriate the key skills each team member brings:

  • contributions to the generation of new ideas, tools, methodologies, or knowledge
  • the development of others and maintenance of effective working relationships
  • contributions to the wider research and innovation community
  • contributions to broader research or innovation users and audiences and towards wider societal benefit
Additions

Provide any further details relevant to your application. This section is optional and can be up to 500 words. You should not use it to describe additional skills, experiences, or outputs, but you can use it to describe any factors that provide context for the rest of your R4RI (for example, details of career breaks if you wish to disclose them).

Complete this as a narrative. Do not format it like a CV.

References may be included within this section.

Research challenges are tackled through a diversity of perspectives. We encourage applicants to consider all aspects of equality, diversity and inclusion in developing their research ideas and teams to ensure that the outcomes of research funded can be maximized and are as broadly applicable as possible.

The roles in funding applications policy has descriptions of the different project roles.

Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)

What are the ethical and RRI considerations, implications and issues relating to the proposed work? If you do not think that the proposed work raises any ethical or RRI issues, explain why.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Demonstrate that you have identified and evaluated:

  • the relevant ethical and RRI considerations, including both the research or topic area itself and the design and delivery of the project
  • the wider implications of the proposed work, and how you will maximise the positive societal, environmental, and economic benefits arising from the project, whilst minimising unintended negative impacts, such as research misuse or accidental harm
  • how you will manage these considerations throughout the lifecycle of the project

If you are collecting or using data, you should identify:

  • any legal and ethical considerations of collecting, releasing and storing the data (including consent, confidentiality, anonymisation, security and other ethical considerations and, in particular, strategies to not preclude further reuse of data)
  • formal information standards that your proposed work will comply with

Additional sub-questions (to be answered only if appropriate) relating to research involving:

  • animals
  • human participants
  • genetically modified organisms

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Please refer to the UKRI position statement on funding ethical research and Responsible innovation for more information around our expectations on ethical and responsible research and innovation.

Animal Involvement and “3Rs”

You must complete this section about how your proposed project will involve or impact animals.

If your project does not involve or impact animals, you must confirm this on the next page.

You may be asked about:

  • what animals you are involving
  • the severity of the procedures you are using
  • where the procedures will take place
  • welfare standards you aim to meet
  • the relevance of your project to the development, validation or dissemination of the 3Rs

You may also need to download, complete, and upload at least one set of additional questions. You will be told how to do this towards the end of this section.

To complete this section and check whether your project is in the scope of the questions, refer to the UKRI policy on research and innovation involving animals.

What counts as an animal

UKRI policy relates to all animals in the Kingdom Animalia, including vertebrates and invertebrates.

Genetically modified organisms and biological risk

You must complete this section if your project will include genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies.

If you project does not involve genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies, you must confirm this on the next page.

You may be asked about:

  • the type of organism your project will involve and the procedures your project will include
  • the intended use of the organism or genetic technology
  • the genetic, biological and environmental risks of your project

For more information, see UKRI’s guidance on genetic technologies.

Human participation in health-related research

You must complete this section about whether your project will include human participation.

If your project does not involve human participation, you must confirm this on the next page.

You may be asked about:

  • what type of human participation your project includes
  • the project design for human participation
  • the phase of the clinical trial
  • whether the project will be in an NHS setting, if so how the project will be registered
  • whether diversity and inclusion will be considered

For more information, see UKRI’s guidance for human participants in research.

Resources and cost justification

Word limit: 1,000

What will you need to deliver your proposed work and how much will it cost?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Justify the application’s more costly resources, in particular:

  • project staff
  • significant travel for field work or collaboration (but not regular travel between collaborating organisations or to conferences)
  • any equipment that will cost more than £25,000
  • any consumables beyond typical requirements, or that are required in exceptional quantities
  • all facilities and infrastructure costs
  • all resources that have been costed as ‘Exceptions’

You can request costs associated with reasonable adjustments where they increase as a direct result of working on the project. For further information see Disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders. Where a funding limit is imposed on the opportunity, requested costs for reasonable adjustments may exceed the maximum funding amount.

Assessors are not looking for detailed costs or a line-by-line breakdown of all project resources. Overall, they want you to demonstrate how the resources you anticipate needing for your proposed work:

  • are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
  • represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
  • maximise potential outcomes and impacts

Declaration of Interests Form (DoI)

Word limit: 10

As part of our commitment to creating an independent research ecosystem on gambling harms, and to ensure fairness, transparency, and compliance with UKRI policies and standards, the project lead and each project co-lead must complete a Declaration of Interests Form.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Please download the Declaration of Interest form (DOCX, 43KB) and follow the guidance below:

Comprehensive disclosure

List all relevant interests, including:

  • current and past funding from gambling operators, industry-linked charities, or advocacy groups
  • consultancy, advisory, or employment roles with gambling-related organisations
  • indirect links (for example, student projects, collaborations, or programme-level funding)
  • other industry ties that may raise concerns (for example, technology or pharma)

Do not omit details mentioned elsewhere in your application or in public registers of interest.

Transparency and trust

The purpose of the DoI is not to exclude applicants but to ensure trust and transparency. A well-detailed declaration with thoughtful mitigations strengthens your application and aligns with UKRI’s expectations. If there is something you are unsure about, include it. It is better to overshare than omit potentially important information.

Mitigations

Provide clear, specific mitigations for both current and future conflicts.

Examples include:

  • ceasing previous projects by a set date
  • programme-level separation when institutional funding overlaps
  • using transparency measures when lived experience groups have industry ties
  • avoiding vague statements (for example, ‘we will follow guidance’) unless referencing verified, existing frameworks
  • including details on how evidence bases and existing data sources will be used and scrutinised
Future planning

Outline how you will manage potential conflicts going forward, such as:

  • plans to avoid industry funding
  • safeguards for stakeholder engagement (for example, not working with licence holders)
  • independent oversight mechanisms
Consistency across documents

Ensure your DoI form is consistent with your application and other public registers of interest. Any omission of declared collaborations or funding will be treated seriously and may result in funding being revoked.

Clarity and detail

Provide enough detail for reviewers to understand, including:

  • the nature of the relationship (for example, employment, funding, or consultancy)
  • the timeline (past, current and future)
  • the scope (direct or indirect funding)

Avoid minimalist or identical declarations without explanation.

Lived experience organisations

If involving lived experience groups:

  • declare their funding sources
  • provide mitigations to address perceptions of conflict if they have industry ties

The Funding Service will provide document upload details when you apply.

Project partners

Add details about any project partners’ contributions. If there are no project partners, you can indicate this on the Funding Service.

A project partner is a collaborating organisation who will have an integral role in the proposed research. This may include direct contributions for example cash, donated equipment and resources, or staff seconded to the project, or indirect and in-kind contributions for example use of project partner’s equipment, datasets, or facilities. Project partners may be in industry, academia, third sector or government organisations in the UK or overseas, including partners based in the EU.

Add the following project partner details:

  • the organisation name and address (searchable via a drop-down list or enter the organisation’s details manually, as applicable)
  • the project partner contact name and email address
  • the type of contribution (direct or indirect) and its monetary value

If a detail is entered incorrectly and you have saved the entry, remove the specific project partner record and re-add it with the correct information.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

Project partners: letters (or emails) of support

Upload a single PDF containing the letters or emails of support from each partner you named in the project partners section. These should be uploaded in English or Welsh only.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Enter the words ‘attachment supplied’ in the text box, or if you do not have any project partners enter ‘N/A’. Each letter or email you provide should:

  • confirm the partner’s commitment to the project
  • clearly explain the value, relevance, and possible benefits of the work to them
  • describe any additional value that they bring to the project
  • have a page limit of one side A4 per partner

The Funding Service will provide document upload details when you apply.

If you do not have any project partners, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.

Ensure you have prior agreement from project partners so that, if you are offered funding, they will support your project as indicated in the Project partners section.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

Intellectual property (IP) management and communication

Word limit: 800

What IP will be generated and how it would be managed during the project?
If your project will not generate any new IP, enter ‘N/A’ into the text box.

IP is a collective term for all intangible assets such as data, clinical trial results, software, know-how, materials, inventions, methods, designs and the associated intellectual property rights (including patents, copyright and trademarks).

The generation of protectable IP is not an essential requirement for DPFS. Projects that will not generate patentable materials but that will nevertheless have the potential to provide health benefits are accepted on an equal basis. However, ownership and management of IP must be consistent with our funding requirements. Projects with no plausible route to exploitation and ultimate health benefit or impact are extremely unlikely to be supportable.

You should:

  • describe any new IP or knowledge that the project is expected to generate
  • outline how any intellectual assets generated will be managed throughout the project to enable further development and ensure future success
  • confirm the organisations or individuals who will own any arising IP and any live, pending or envisioned agreements governing ownership or exploitation of that IP
  • outline if the applicants have freedom to operate for this project, for future development work, or for clinical use
  • if access to background IP is required, explain this including the organisations or individuals that hold the relevant background IP rights. If this background IP is held by a third party (or a non-academic applicant), has access been agreed? If not, why do you believe you will be able to access the required IP on reasonable terms

Data management and sharing

Word limit: 800

How will you manage and share data collected or acquired through the proposed research?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Provide a data management plan that clearly details how you will comply with UKRI’s published data sharing policy, which includes detailed guidance notes.

Within this section we also expect you to:

  • plan for the research through the life cycle of the award until data is accepted for archiving by the UK Data Service (UKDS) or a responsible data repository
  • cover any legal and ethical considerations of collecting, releasing or storing the data, including consent, confidentiality, anonymisation, security and other ethical issues
  • include any challenges to data sharing, for example copyright or data confidentiality, with possible solutions discussed to optimise data sharing, and consideration of how your data will be formatted to ensure interoperability

If this does not apply to your proposed work, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.

Facilities

Word limit: 250

Does your proposed research require the support and use of a facility?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

If you will need to use a facility, follow your proposed facility’s normal access request procedures. Ensure you have prior agreement so that if you are offered funding, they will support the use of their facility on your project.

For each requested facility you will need to provide the:

  • name of facility, copied and pasted from the facility information list (DOCX, 43KB)
  • proposed usage or costs, or costs per unit where indicated on the facility information list
  • confirmation you have their agreement where required

Facilities should only be named if they are on the facility information list above. If you will not need to use a facility, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.

Clinical research using NHS resources

Word count: 250

Are you applying to do clinical research in the UK?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Researchers applying to do clinical research in the NHS, public health or social care usually need to complete a Schedule of Events Cost Attribution Tool (SoECAT).

We request the SoECAT because we want to know that you have taken the appropriate steps to request National institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) support and for the full costs of your research to be attributed, calculated and paid.

We want to see the expected total resources required for your project to consider if these are appropriate.

Enter ‘Yes’ and complete and upload a SoECAT if you are applying for clinical research and:

  • you will carry out your research in the UK
  • your research will use NHS resources
  • the research requires approval by Health Research Authority (England) or its equivalents in Northern Ireland, Scotland or Wales
  • you will need support from the NIHR Research Delivery Network, this may include studies in a social care or public health setting

It is important to complete a SoECAT to be eligible for NIHR support. You must complete a SoECAT even if you do not think your clinical research will involve excess treatment costs (ETCs).

Explore MRC guidance on who needs to complete a SoECAT

How to complete a SoECAT

Explore NIHR SoECAT guidance

These are the steps you need to take:

  1. Contact an attributing the costs of health and social care research and development (AcoRD) specialist as early as possible in the application process.
  2. Complete an online SoECAT. Excel versions of the form have been discontinued. If you do not have an account for NIHR’s Central Portfolio Management System (CPMS) you will need create and activate one. See the NIHR user guide for instructions
  3. Request authorisation of your SoECAT.
  4. Once authorised extract the ‘study information’ and the ‘summary’ page from the ‘Funder Export’, combine them as a single PDF and upload it to your application.

Applications that require a SoECAT but have not attached the SoECAT funder export study information and summary may be rejected.

Ensure the AcoRD specialist name and date are included within the uploaded summary page. The SoECAT is invalid without this information.

Contact ukrirm@ukri.org if you have questions about the UKRI aspects of this process or have concerns that your SoECAT may not be authorised in time for the application closing date.

If this does not apply to your proposed work, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I)

Trusted Research and Innovation is the protection of the UK’s intellectual property, sensitive research, people, and infrastructure from potential theft, misuse, and exploitation.

Organisations receiving UKRI funding are obliged to act in line with UK government legislation. They are also expected to undertake appropriate due diligence assessments of organisations involved in research partnerships, collaboration agreements, and commercial contracts.

You will be asked about:

  • Which areas of the National Security and Investment (NSI) Act your project relates to
  • Who you intend to collaborate with and how
  • If your project requires an export control licence

Your answers may affect the T&Cs of your funding agreement if you are successful. We may use your answers to determine that our current T&Cs are sufficient or if additional T&Cs are required.

How we will assess your application

Assessment process

We will assess your application using the following process.

Panel

A panel of independent experts will independently assess the quality of your application. Depending on the number of applications submitted, UKRI may need shortlist applications for discussion at the panel meeting.

The panel will make a funding recommendation.

For more information on how we prioritise applications for funding please visit How we make decisions.

UKRI will make the final funding decision.

Timescale

We aim to complete the assessment process within five months of receiving your application.

Feedback

Applicants will be provided written feedback following shortlisting assessment.

Principles of assessment

We support the San Francisco declaration on research assessment and recognise the relationship between research assessment and research integrity.

Find out about the UKRI principles of assessment and decision making.

Using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in expert review

Generative AI may be used only for the purpose of language refinement during application assessment. When using generative AI to refine the language of a review, expert reviewers and panellists must ensure that:

  • no part of the application being assessed is entered into a generative AI tool
  • no personal information from the application is disclosed
  • generative AI is not tasked with understanding, summarising or evaluating the application’s content

Expert reviewers and panellists must also:

  • comply with relevant intellectual property and data protection legislation
  • not take into account or speculate within their assessment whether generative AI has been used to develop the application

For more detail see our policy on the use of generative AI.

Sharing data with co-funders

We will need to share the application (including any personal information that it contains) with Department for Culture, Media, and Sports (DCMS) so that they can participate in the assessment process.

For more information on how DCMS uses personal information, visit the DCMS personal information charter for further detail.

We reserve the right to modify the assessment process as needed.

Assessment areas

The assessment areas we will use are:

  • Vision
  • Approach
  • Applicant and team capability to deliver
  • Ethics and responsible research and innovation
  • Resources and cost justification
  • Data Management

Find details of assessment questions and criteria under the ‘Application questions’ heading in the ‘How to apply’ section.

Contact details

Get help with your application

If you have a question and the answers aren’t provided on this page

The helpdesk is committed to helping users of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service as effectively and as quickly as possible. In order to manage cases at peak volume times, the helpdesk will triage and prioritise those queries with an imminent opportunity deadline or a technical issue. Enquiries raised where information is available on the Funding finder opportunity page and should be understood early in the application process (for example, regarding eligibility, content or remit of a funding opportunity) will not constitute a priority case and will be addressed as soon as possible.

Contact details

For help and advice on costings and writing your application please contact your research office in the first instance, allowing sufficient time for your organisation’s submission process.

For questions related to this specific funding opportunity please contact operations@ahrc.ukri.org

Any queries regarding the system or the submission of applications through the Funding Service should be directed to the helpdesk.

Email: support@funding-service.ukri.org
Phone: 01793 547490

Our phone lines are open:

  • Monday to Thursday 8:30am to 5:00pm
  • Friday 8:30am to 4:30pm

To help us process queries more efficiently, we request that users highlight the council and opportunity name in the subject title of their email query, include the application reference number, and refrain from contacting more than one mailbox at a time.

For further information on submitting an application read How applicants use the Funding Service.

Additional info

Background

Further information on the gambling levy can be found in the following resources:

Research and innovation impact

Impact can be defined as the long-term intended or unintended effect research and innovation has on society, economy and the environment; to individuals, organisations, and the wider global population.

Supporting documents

Equality Impact Assessment Form (DOCX, 97 KB)

Declaration of Interest Form (DOCX, 43KB)

Research disruption due to COVID-19

We recognise that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused major interruptions and disruptions across our communities. We are committed to ensuring that individual applicants and their wider team, including partners and networks, are not penalised for any disruption to their career, such as:

  • breaks and delays
  • disruptive working patterns and conditions
  • the loss of ongoing work
  • role changes that may have been caused by the pandemic

Reviewers and panel members will be advised to consider the unequal impacts that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the capability to deliver and career development of those individuals included in the application. They will be asked to consider the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the research they are proposing.

Where disruptions have occurred, you can highlight this within your application if you wish, but there is no requirement to detail the specific circumstances that caused the disruption.

This is the website for UKRI: our seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help improve our online products and services.