Funding opportunity

Funding opportunity: A guide for the commercialisation of Creative Industries Research

Apply for funding to transform the commercialisation of research in the creative industries. A university-led team will collaborate with investors, lawyers and founders to tackle early-stage barriers to commercialisation and develop a new sector-specific university commercialisation guide, with practical frameworks and best practice deal terms.

Applicants should be well placed to lead sector consultation and active engagement across universities and wider stakeholders.

The full economic cost (FEC) of your project can be up to £250,000. Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) will fund 100% FEC.

Who can apply

This funding opportunity is open to organisations with standard eligibility. Check if your organisation is eligible.

Equality, diversity and inclusion

We are committed to achieving equality of opportunity for all funding applicants. We encourage applications from a diverse range of researchers.

We support people to work in a way that suits their personal circumstances. This includes:

  • career breaks
  • support for people with caring responsibilities
  • flexible working
  • alternative working patterns

UKRI can offer disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders during the application and assessment process.

What we're looking for

Demand management

Demand management is not being applied to this funding opportunity.

Scope

Ventures formed to translate university research, including spin-outs, partnerships and cooperatives, are critical drivers of innovation, productivity and economic growth, translating research into high-value commercial activity.

The UK government recognises the creative industries (CI) as one of eight high-growth sectors in its Industrial Strategy, there is a clear opportunity to strengthen the contribution of CI ventures emerging from universities to the UK economy and the ambitions set out in the CI Sector Plan.

The University Spin-out Investment Terms (USIT) guides have successfully established best practice for transparent, consistent deal-making between universities, founders and investors, improving efficiency and confidence in the commercialisation ecosystem. These guides have primarily focused on life sciences, deep tech and, more recently, software. They do not fully reflect the distinct characteristics of creative industries ventures. They have also focused on spin-outs as a commercialisation mechanism for those sectors.

Therefore, AHRC, in collaboration with Research England, is seeking a novel and innovative, sector-led approach. To ultimately develop a tailored, CI-specific USIT-style guide to enable commercialisation of Creative Industries research from within the UK’s universities, with awareness to the many ways ventures are formed. This should build upon the existing landscape to create new frameworks and approaches that reflect the realities of the CI sector.

To achieve this, applications must be built on strong, credible partnerships between universities, organisations with proven expertise in translating creative industries research and investors. The lead organisation must demonstrate its ability to convene and lead a sector-wide collaboration and co-develop solutions that are grounded in real-world practice.

The guide should:

  • be co-developed through extensive consultation and active engagement across universities, investors and the wider CI ecosystem
  • reflect the distinct pathways from research to commercialisation pathway for example, spin-out, growth and exit, in the creative industries
  • recognise the difference in intellectual property in CI commercialisation and consider how this is treated by universities and investors
  • provide clear, practical recommendations on key aspects of deal-making, for example, founding equity, licensing approaches, university processes and timelines, and spin-out readiness
  • offer a landing zone and guidance for fair and transparent deals
  • offer a new sector-specific framework that improves clarity, confidence and collaboration across universities, founders, investors and other stakeholders as appropriate
  • draw on and adapt relevant and appropriate international best practice

The partnership should produce a guide that can be widely adopted, practically useful, and transformative in improving the speed, quality and consistency of deal-making for CI ventures.

Requirements

Applications must clearly demonstrate that the partnership brings together the skills, experience and sector insight required to deliver this ambition. In particular applications should focus on evidencing knowledge, skills and capabilities such as:

  • end-to-end experience of CI commercialisation, including developing pipelines, advancing proof of concept and proof of market, with demonstrable success in securing investment across all stages (for example, early-stage, Series A and beyond) within the creative industries.
  • a strong track record in supporting CI commercial models including scaling university spin-outs, mentoring founders, building effective leadership teams, and managing complex equity and capital structures
  • deep, applied understanding of the creative industries ecosystem, including its commercial models, investor landscape and barriers
  • the ability to work collaboratively across institutional and sector boundaries, bringing together universities, investors and other expert partners
  • experience and knowledge in nurturing all aspects of commercial models, to ensure they are attractive propositions, including experience in encouraging entrepreneurship, enabling c-suite teams and managing complex cap tables

Partnerships must include organisations with direct, demonstrable experience of translating creative industries research into commercial ventures, alongside investors or investment-facing organisations with a proven track record in the sector.

This should be clearly evidenced through the application and supported by strong letters of commitment from partners

Applications should reflect:

  • a clear and credible delivery plan, including timelines and milestones for sector engagements, consultation and development of the guide
  • an inclusive and evidence led approach to developing the guide to ensure that outputs are practical and widely adoptable
  • that the format and structure of the guide will be determined by the award holder and should be designed to be the most appropriate and effective for the creative industries

Duration

The duration of this award is 12 months.

Projects must start by 1 April 2027.

Funding available

The FEC of your project can be up to £250,000.

AHRC will fund 100% of the FEC.

What we will fund

We will fund:

  • travel and subsistence for project-related activity
  • costs associated with organising and delivering workshops, roundtables consultations or similar engagement activities
  • other essential costs directly related to the development, production and dissemination of the guide
  • staff time for professional services or project management to enable the production of the guide. This may include the writing of the guide

What we will not fund

We will not fund:

  • staff time, for those contributing to developing the guide by giving their expertise where this is expected to be contributed in-kind and align with existing roles and responsibilities. This includes the expectation of in-kind time for an appropriate senior leader of the activity with credibility in the CI sector
  • time or fees for external contributors such as investors, founders, or advisors, which should also be provided in-kind. Travel and subsistence expenses for stakeholders to take part in the activity can be supported through the funding (see above for costs associated with engagement activities under what we will fund)
  • costs not directly related to the development and delivery of the guide

We expect contributions to this project to be largely in-kind, drawing on existing roles, expertise and networks across the partnership. This reflects the intention that the guide is sector-led and co-owned, with strong buy-in from universities, investors and industry stakeholders.

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I)

UKRI is committed in ensuring that effective international collaboration in research and innovation takes place with integrity and within strong ethical frameworks. Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I) is a UKRI work programme designed to help protect all those working in our thriving and collaborative international sector by enabling partnerships to be as open as possible, and as secure as necessary. Our TR&I Principles set out UKRI’s expectations of organisations funded by UKRI in relation to due diligence for international collaboration.

As such, applicants for UKRI funding may be asked to demonstrate how their proposed projects will comply with our approach and expectation towards TR&I, identifying potential risks and the relevant controls you will put in place to help proportionately reduce these risks.

See further guidance and information about TR&I, including where applicants can find additional support.

How to apply

We are running this funding opportunity on the new UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service so please ensure that your organisation is registered. You cannot apply on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system.

The project lead is responsible for completing the application process on the Funding Service, but we expect all team members and project partners to contribute to the application.

Only the lead research organisation can submit an application to UKRI.

To apply

Select ‘Start application’ near the beginning of this Funding finder page.

  1. Confirm you are the project lead
  2. Sign in or create a Funding Service account. To create an account, select your organisation, verify your email address, and set a password.
  3. Answer questions directly in the text boxes. You can save your answers and come back to complete them or work offline and return to copy and paste your answers. If we need you to upload a document, follow the upload instructions in the Funding Service. All questions and assessment criteria are listed in the How to apply section on this Funding finder page.
  4. Allow enough time to check your application in ‘read-only’ view before sending to your research office.
  5. Send the completed application to your research office for checking. They will return it to you if it needs editing.
  6. Your research office will submit the completed and checked application to UKRI.

Please be aware that research office and finance teams undertake checks on hosting arrangements and financial eligibility. The ultimate responsibility for ensuring compliance with all opportunity requirements lies with the applicant.

Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant.

When including images, you must:

  • provide a descriptive caption or legend for each image immediately underneath it in the text box (this must be outside the image and counts towards your word limit)
  • insert each new image on a new line
  • use files smaller than 5MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format

Images should only be used to convey important visual information that cannot easily be put into words. The following are not permitted, and your application will be rejected if you include:

  • sentences or paragraphs of text
  • tables
  • excessive quantities of images

A few words are permitted where the image would lack clarity without the contextual words, such as a diagram, where text labels are required for an axis or graph column.

For more guidance on the Funding Service, see:

References

References should be included within the word count of the appropriate question section. You should use your discretion when including references and prioritise those most pertinent to the application.

Hyperlinks can be used in reference information. When including references, you should consider how your references will be viewed and used by the assessors, ensuring that:

  • references are easily identifiable by the assessors
  • references are formatted as appropriate to your research
  • persistent identifiers are used where possible

General use of hyperlinks

Applications should be self-contained. You should only use hyperlinks to link directly to reference information. You must not include links to web resources to extend your application. Assessors are not required to access links to conduct assessment or recommend a funding decision.

Generative artificial intelligence (AI)

Use of generative AI tools to prepare funding applications is permitted, however, caution should be applied.

For more information see our policy on the use of generative AI in application and assessment.

Deadline

AHRC must receive your application by 15 October 2026 at 4:00pm UK time.

You will not be able to apply after this time.

Make sure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines.

Following the submission of your application to this funding opportunity, your application cannot be changed, and submitted applications will not be amended. If your application does not follow the guidance, it may be rejected.

Personal data

Processing personal data

AHRC, as part of UKRI, will need to collect some personal information to manage your Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications.

We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.

Sensitive information

If you or a core team member need to tell us something you wish to remain confidential, email Operations@ahrc.ukri.org

Include in the subject line: [the funding opportunity title; sensitive information; your Funding Service application number].

Typical examples of confidential information include:

  • individual is unavailable until a certain date (for example due to parental leave)
  • declaration of interest
  • additional information about eligibility to apply that would not be appropriately shared in the ‘Applicant and team capability’ section
  • conflict of interest for UKRI to consider in reviewer or panel participant selection
  • the application is an invited resubmission

For information about how UKRI handles personal data, read UKRI’s privacy notice.

Institutional matched funding

There is no requirement for matched funding from the institutions hosting the project lead, project co-leads or other staff employed on the application. Expert reviewers and panels assessing UKRI funding applications must not consider levels of institutional matched funding as a factor on which to base recommendations. Direct and in-kind contributions from third party project partners are encouraged.

This policy does not remove the need for support from host organisations who must provide the necessary research environment and infrastructure for award-specific activities funded by UKRI. For example, research facilities, training and development of staff.

Publication of outcomes

AHRC, as part of UKRI, will publish the outcomes of this funding opportunity at  What AHRC has funded.

If your application is successful, we will publish some personal information on the UKRI Gateway to Research.

Summary

Word limit: 550

In plain English, provide a clear summary to support assessment panel members in understanding and assessing your application.

We usually make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, therefore do not include any confidential or sensitive information. Make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example:

  • opinion-formers
  • policymakers
  • the public
  • the wider research community

Guidance for writing a summary

Clearly describe the proposed work in terms of:

  • context
  • the challenge the project addresses
  • aims and objectives
  • potential applications and benefits

Core team

List the key members of your team and assign them roles from the following:

  • project lead (PL)
  • project co-lead (UK) (PcL)
  • specialist
  • grant manager
  • professional enabling staff
  • research and innovation associate

Only list one individual as project lead.

UKRI has introduced a new addition to the ‘Specialist’ role type. Public contributors such as people with lived experience can now be added to an application.

Find out more about UKRI’s core team roles in funding applications.

Application questions

Vision

Word limit: 2,000

What are you hoping to achieve with your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how your proposed work:

  • is of excellent quality and importance within or beyond the field(s) or area(s)
  • has the potential to advance current understanding, generates new knowledge, thinking or discovery within or beyond the field or area
  • meets the strategic aims of the funding opportunity
  • will be delivered by a strong partnership with the skills, experience and sector insight required to achieve the proposed ambition
  • reflects the diverse pathways from research to commercialisation pathway in the creative industries
  • draws on and adapts relevant and appropriate international best practice
  • is informed by extensive consultation and active engagement across universities, investors and the wider CI ecosystem
  • will lead to increased adoption of effective commercialisation approaches in the creative industries, to drive economic growth

Your project must develop a guide which is inclusive and evidence led to ensure that the output is widely adoptable by the sector.

References may be included within this section.

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Approach

Word limit: 3,000

How are you going to deliver your proposed work to meet the aims of this funding opportunity?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how you have designed your approach so that it:

  • is effective and appropriate to achieve your objectives
  • clearly outlines the individual activities of the project
  • sets out for each activity, the inputs required, the activity to be undertaken, the expected outputs and outcomes, and the measurable impacts
  • sets out key milestones and timeline for delivery
  • explains how each activity will be resourced or delivered, including any in-kind contributions from partners

You may find it useful to include a table to demonstrate the activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts.

References may be included within this section.

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Applicant and team capability to deliver

Word limit: 1,650

Why are you the right individual or team to successfully deliver the proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Evidence of how you, and if relevant your team, have:

  • the relevant experience (appropriate to career stage) to deliver the proposed work
  • the right balance of skills and expertise to cover the proposed work
  • the appropriate leadership and management skills to deliver the work and your approach to develop others
  • contributed to developing a positive research environment and wider community
  • a strong track record of the collaboration working in the creative industries
  • a strong track record of long-standing support for the development of the CI ecosystem through sustained activity and partnerships
  • experience of knowledge exchange and commercialisation activity across different commercial models within the CI sector, including scaling spin-outs, encouraging entrepreneurship and supporting effective-suite teams
  • credibility and trust within the sector, including the ability to build and secure sector-wide buy in through the outlined collaboration
  • experience in developing and delivering best practice for example, toolkits, frameworks or guides

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

The word limit for this section is 1,650 words: 1,150 words to be used for Résumé for Research and Innovation (R4RI) modules (including references) and, if necessary, a further 500 words for Additions.

Use the R4RI format to showcase the range of relevant skills you and, if relevant, your team (project lead and project co-leads, researchers, technicians, specialists, partners and so on) have and how this will help deliver the proposed work. You can include individuals’ specific achievements but only choose past contributions that best evidence their ability to deliver this work.

Complete this section using the R4RI module headings listed. Use each heading once and include a response for the whole team, see the UKRI guidance on R4RI. You should consider how to balance your answer, and emphasise where appropriate the key skills each team member brings:

  • contributions to the generation of new ideas, tools, methodologies, or knowledge
  • the development of others and maintenance of effective working relationships
  • contributions to the wider research and innovation community
  • contributions to broader research or innovation users and audiences and towards wider societal benefit
Additions

Provide any further details relevant to your application. This section is optional and can be up to 500 words. You should not use it to describe additional skills, experiences, or outputs, but you can use it to describe any factors that provide context for the rest of your R4RI (for example, details of career breaks if you wish to disclose them).

Complete this as a narrative. Do not format it like a CV.

References may be included within this section.

You should demonstrate how your background in knowledge exchange and commercialisation can drive value for the CI sector and shape the development of the guide. You should also demonstrate how your project aims to build upon everyone’s expertise to deliver a collaborative and innovative approach.

The core leadership team should consist of the project lead and the project co-leads identified on the outline proposal. There will be scope to expand this team and include new collaborators on the full application and you will be able to add further detail.

Showcase the range of relevant skills you and, if relevant, your team (project lead and project co-leads, specialists, partners and so on) have and how this will help deliver the proposed work.

The roles in funding applications policy has descriptions of the different project roles.

Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)

What are the ethical and RRI considerations, implications and issues relating to the proposed work? If you do not think that the proposed work raises any ethical or RRI issues, explain why.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Demonstrate that you have identified and evaluated:

  • the relevant ethical and RRI considerations, including both the research or topic area itself and the design and delivery of the project
  • the wider implications of the proposed work, and how you will maximise the positive societal, environmental, and economic benefits arising from the project, whilst minimising unintended negative impacts, such as research misuse or accidental harm
  • how you will manage these considerations throughout the lifecycle of the project

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Please refer to the UKRI position statement on funding ethical research and Responsible innovation for more information around our expectations on ethical and responsible research and innovation.

Animal involvement and “3Rs”

You must complete this section about how your proposed project will involve or impact animals.

If your project does not involve or impact animals, you must confirm this on the next page.

You may be asked about:

  • what animals you are involving
  • the severity of the procedures you are using
  • where the procedures will take place
  • welfare standards you aim to meet
  • the relevance of your project to the development, validation or dissemination of the 3Rs

You may also need to download, complete, and upload at least one set of additional questions. You will be told how to do this towards the end of this section.

To complete this section and check whether your project is in the scope of the questions, refer to the UKRI policy on research and innovation involving animals.

What counts as an animal

UKRI policy relates to all animals in the Kingdom Animalia, including vertebrates and invertebrates.

Genetically modified organisms and biological risk

You must complete this section if your project will include genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies.

If you project does not involve genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies, you must confirm this on the next page.

You may be asked about:

  • the type of organism your project will involve and the procedures your project will include
  • the intended use of the organism or genetic technology
  • the genetic, biological and environmental risks of your project

For more information, see UKRI’s guidance on genetic technologies.

Human participation in health-related research

You must complete this section about whether your project will include human participation.

If your project does not involve human participation, you must confirm this on the next page.

You may be asked about:

  • what type of human participation your project includes
  • the project design for human participation
  • the phase of the clinical trial
  • whether the project will be in an NHS setting, if so how the project will be registered
  • whether diversity and inclusion will be considered

For more information, see UKRI’s guidance for human participants in research.

Resources and cost justification

Word limit: 1,000

What will you need to complete your activity and how much will it cost?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Justify the application’s more costly resources, in particular:

  • project staff
  • significant travel for field work or collaboration (but not regular travel between collaborating organisations or to conferences)
  • any consumables beyond typical requirements, or that are required in exceptional quantities
  • all resources that have been costed as ‘Exceptions’
  • contribution from international partner in cash or kind

You can request costs associated with reasonable adjustments where they increase as a direct result of working on the project. For further information see Disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders. Where a funding limit is imposed on the opportunity, requested costs for reasonable adjustments may exceed the maximum funding amount.

Assessors are not looking for detailed costs or a line-by-line breakdown of all project resources. Overall, they want you to demonstrate how the resources you anticipate needing for your proposed work:

  • are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
  • represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
  • maximise potential outcomes and impacts

Partnerships and stakeholder engagement

Word limit: 2,000

How will you leverage your networks to convene and engage the stakeholders needed to inform the production of the guide?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Your response demonstrate how you will:

  • identify the key partners and stakeholders you will engage, for example investors, founders, companies and legal experts, and explain why they are critical to the project
  • leverage existing relationships and networks within the CI sector and how these will enable you to bring together the right partners and stakeholders to inform the development of the guide
  • convene and engage stakeholders to ensure meaningful contribution, for example through workshops, roundtables and advisory groups
  • secure buy in and active contribution from partners and stakeholders across all stages of the project

Your response should be specific and provide examples where possible, including names organisations and individuals where appropriate. Where possible evidence commitment from key stakeholders by providing letters of support in the project partners section.

Project partners

Add details about any project partners’ contributions. If there are no project partners, you can indicate this on the Funding Service.

A project partner is a collaborating organisation who will have an integral role in the proposed research. This may include direct contributions for example cash, donated equipment and resources, or staff seconded to the project, or indirect and in-kind contributions for example use of project partner’s equipment, datasets, or facilities. Project partners may be in industry, academia, third sector or government organisations in the UK or overseas, including partners based in the EU.

Add the following project partner details:

  • the organisation name and address (searchable via a drop-down list or enter the organisation’s details manually, as applicable)
  • the project partner contact name and email address
  • the type of contribution (direct or indirect) and its monetary value

If a detail is entered incorrectly and you have saved the entry, remove the specific project partner record and re-add it with the correct information.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

Project partners: letters (or emails) of support

Please provide clear endorsement from partners that you intend to co-create the guide with for example investors.

We recognise that partners may join the project throughout, but we expect to see clear buy in from key co-creation partners, as identified in your application, at the outset. Therefore, we expect to see letters of support demonstrating buy-in to your approach and willingness to co-create the Guide.

Upload a single PDF containing the letters or emails of support from each partner you named in the project partners section. These should be uploaded in English or Welsh only.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Enter the words ‘attachment supplied’ in the text box, or if you do not have any project partners enter ‘N/A’. Each letter or email you provide should:

  • confirm the partner’s commitment to the project
  • clearly explain the value, relevance, and possible benefits of the work to them
  • describe any additional value that they bring to the project
  • have a page limit of two sides A4 per partner

The Funding Service will provide document upload details when you apply.

If you do not have any project partners, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.

Ensure you have prior agreement from project partners so that, if you are offered funding, they will support your project as indicated in the Project partners section.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I)

Trusted Research and Innovation is the protection of the UK’s intellectual property, sensitive research, people, and infrastructure from potential theft, misuse, and exploitation.

Organisations receiving UKRI funding are obliged to act in line with UK government legislation. They are also expected to undertake appropriate due diligence assessments of organisations involved in research partnerships, collaboration agreements, and commercial contracts.

You will be asked about:

  • which areas of the National Security and Investment (NSI) Act your project relates to
  • who you intend to collaborate with and how
  • if your project requires an export control licence

Your answers may affect the T&Cs of your funding agreement if you are successful. We may use your answers to determine that our current T&Cs are sufficient or if additional T&Cs are required.

How we will assess your application

Assessment process

We will assess your application using the following process.

Eligibility check

All applications will be examined to ensure they meet the eligibility criteria and remit of the funding opportunity. If your application is outside the scope, you will be advised by email, and we will not assess your application.

Expert panel

Following eligibility and remit checks, the panel will be convened by Research England (RE) and AHRC. Panel members will assess the applications based on the assessment criteria and provide funding recommendations.

AHRC and RE will make the final funding decision and reserves the right at each stage of the assessment process, to use expert panel recommendations to create a balanced portfolio of funded applications that encompass a range of geographies and research themes.

For more information on how we prioritise applications for funding please visit How we make decisions.

Timescale

We aim to complete the assessment process within 3 months of receiving your application.

Feedback

We will give feedback with the outcome of your application upon request.

Principles of assessment

We support the San Francisco declaration on research assessment and recognise the relationship between research assessment and research integrity.

Find out about the UKRI principles of assessment and decision making.

Using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in expert review

Generative AI may be used only for the purpose of language refinement during application assessment. When using generative AI to refine the language of a review, expert reviewers and panellists must ensure that:

  • no part of the application being assessed is entered into a generative AI tool
  • no personal information from the application is disclosed
  • generative AI is not tasked with understanding, summarising or evaluating the application’s content

Expert reviewers and panellists must also:

  • comply with relevant intellectual property and data protection legislation
  • not take into account or speculate within their assessment whether generative AI has been used to develop the application

For more detail see our policy on the use of generative AI.

Assessment areas

The assessment areas we will use are:

  • Vision
  • Approach
  • Applicant and Team Capability to Deliver
  • Ethics and RRI
  • Resources and cost justification
  • Partnership and stakeholder engagement

Find details of assessment questions and criteria under the ‘Application questions’ heading in the ‘How to apply’ section.

Contact details

Get help with your application

If you have a question and the answers aren’t provided on this page

The helpdesk is committed to helping users of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service as effectively and as quickly as possible. In order to manage cases at peak volume times, the helpdesk will triage and prioritise those queries with an imminent opportunity deadline or a technical issue. Enquiries raised where information is available on the Funding finder opportunity page and should be understood early in the application process (for example, regarding eligibility, content or remit of a funding opportunity) will not constitute a priority case and will be addressed as soon as possible.

Contact details

For help and advice on costings and writing your application please contact your research office in the first instance, allowing sufficient time for your organisation’s submission process.

For questions related to this specific funding opportunity please contact Operations@ahrc.ukri.org

Any queries regarding the system or the submission of applications through the Funding Service should be directed to the helpdesk.

Email: support@funding-service.ukri.org
Phone: 01793 547490

Our phone lines are open:

  • Monday to Thursday 8:30am to 5:00pm
  • Friday 8:30am to 4:30pm

To help us process queries more efficiently, we request that users highlight the council and opportunity name in the subject title of their email query, include the application reference number, and refrain from contacting more than one mailbox at a time.

For further information on submitting an application read How applicants use the Funding Service.

Additional info

Research and innovation impact

Impact can be defined as the long-term intended or unintended effect research and innovation has on society, economy and the environment; to individuals, organisations, and the wider global population.

Research disruption due to COVID-19

We recognise that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused major interruptions and disruptions across our communities. We are committed to ensuring that individual applicants and their wider team, including partners and networks, are not penalised for any disruption to their career, such as:

  • breaks and delays
  • disruptive working patterns and conditions
  • the loss of ongoing work
  • role changes that may have been caused by the pandemic

Reviewers and panel members will be advised to consider the unequal impacts that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the capability to deliver and career development of those individuals included in the application. They will be asked to consider the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the research they are proposing.

Where disruptions have occurred, you can highlight this within your application if you wish, but there is no requirement to detail the specific circumstances that caused the disruption.

This is the website for UKRI: our seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help improve our online products and services.