Funding opportunity

Funding opportunity: Economic research on the returns to R&D investment

Apply for funding to support research that can help develop new measurements of the return on investments in research and development (R&D).

You must be based at a UK research organisation eligible for UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) funding, however, collaborations with international researchers are strongly encouraged.

The full economic cost (FEC) of your project can be up to £308,000. UKRI will fund 80% of the FEC.

The duration of this award is 24 months. Projects should start no later than 1 April 2027.

Who can apply

This opportunity is open to organisations with standard eligibility. Check if your organisation is eligible.

International researchers

As UKRI is a lead funder for this funding opportunity, international researchers can apply as ‘project co-lead (international)’. You should include all other international collaborators (or UK partners not based at approved organisations) as project partners.

Equality, diversity and inclusion

We are committed to achieving equality of opportunity for all funding applicants. We encourage applications from a diverse range of researchers.

We support people to work in a way that suits their personal circumstances. This includes:

  • career breaks
  • support for people with caring responsibilities
  • flexible working
  • alternative working patterns

UKRI can offer disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders during the application and assessment process.

Remit

If you are unsure whether your proposed research falls within the remit of this funding opportunity, email a brief summary to EconomicROI@esrc.ukri.org and we will get back to you.

What we're looking for

Demand management

Demand management is not being applied to this funding opportunity

Aim

UKRI is seeking to support research that can help develop consensus estimates of the economic and social return on investments in research and development (R&D). This funding opportunity aims to spur rigorous, empirical studies that can narrow the range of existing estimates and inform public and private R&D investment decisions.

This funding opportunity is solely supported by UKRI but has been developed in collaboration with the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and Coefficient Giving as part of an international research challenge. UKRI award holders will be encouraged to engage with award holders funded directly by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and Coefficient Giving.

Scope

This funding opportunity is supported through the UK Metascience Unit. Metascience is a rapidly expanding research field that draws on a wide range of disciplinary expertise to understand how research is conducted, funded and supported, and how these practices can be enhanced or improved. For a deeper understanding of what metascience means to UKRI, please see the UK Metascience Unit’s report.

Coined after economist Zvi Griliches, ‘the Griliches Question’ explores the social and economic return on investment in R&D, a measure that has significant policy implications.

The UK Government’s science, innovation and technology R&D budget will grow in real terms over the Spending Review period, totalling £58.5 billion from 2026 to 2027 to 2029 to 2030, with the current best estimate being that, on average, for every £2 of private R&D investment, £8 of net benefits is generated in the long run (DSIT R&D plans 2029/2030).

Despite a substantial body of evidence on R&D returns, important questions remain about how best to measure these returns and how they vary across sectors, places, technologies, and funding mechanisms.

This programme supports innovative and ambitious research projects to deepen our understanding and improve accuracy in measuring the return on investment in R&D.

Given the importance of quantitative evidence in informing UK policy and investment decisions, proposals are encouraged to develop robust estimates and empirical approaches that can strengthen understanding of R&D returns and support evidence-based decision making. However, applicants may also draw on qualitative and mixed methods approaches where these can help address key evidence gaps, explain underlying mechanisms, contextualise quantitative findings, or contribute to a richer understanding of how R&D generates social and economic benefits.

This funding opportunity aims to generate evidence that can support policymakers, funders and investors in making more informed decisions about the scale, targeting and allocation of future R&D investments.

Some questions that can be explored through this grant, but are not limited to include:

Estimating returns

  • how the return to R&D should be defined for the purpose at hand, including private vs. social returns and marginal vs. average returns, and which empirical objects best map these concepts
  • what the returns to public spending are and how these vary across different funding designs
  • what the social returns to corporate R&D are, including whether there is evidence of differential returns to applied research and development activities
  • the extent to which public and private R&D investments act as substitutes or complements

Spillovers, welfare and policy

  • how knowledge spillovers flow across firms, sectors, and borders and whether new data sources or methods can improve our ability to trace them
  • the rate at which knowledge produced by R&D becomes obsolete and whether this varies across fields
  • how large the welfare gains from R&D are in domains where benefits are poorly captured by GDP
  • how public policy (e.g. tax incentives, program design, subsidies) affects the level and productivity of R&D investment

Methodology

  • what accounts for the wide range of published estimates, and what refinements or reconciliations across approaches might narrow disagreement?
  • what approaches to decomposing returns across sectors, technologies, and investment approaches can provide decision-relevant insight on the various sources of overall returns?
  • how productivity impacts can be measured in ways that are robust to alternative specifications and research contexts?
  • how methodologies can better capture R&D activities, sectors, places and impacts that may be overlooked in existing evidence, datasets and measurement approaches

Actionable insights for policy and wider public sector organisations should be a goal of the projects awarded through this programme. Applications that are only theoretical or loosely related to the estimation of returns to R&D are out of scope and will not be eligible for funding.

We welcome applications from researchers who have relevant expertise in all disciplines. We strongly encourage those from disciplinary backgrounds which might bring novel methodologies and datasets, qualitative and quantitative, to this funding opportunity.

Grant holders will become part of a cohort of awards funded by UKRI through this funding opportunity and also awards funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and Coefficient Giving in their Pop-Up Journal initiative.

UKRI award holders will be invited to attend networking events with international colleagues in the cohort. This will comprise of:

  • an annual workshop in Washington DC hosted by National Bureau of Economic Research in October 2027 and October 2028
  • an annual one-day workshop in London hosted by the British Academy in spring 2028 and spring 2029

You should consider attendance at these events when planning their project activities and budgets. No additional funding will be provided for this purpose. You are advised to budget for travel and three nights of accommodation for each visit to Washington DC alongside travel to London.

Funded researchers will be encouraged to make use of the Pop-Up Journal platform and support the journal’s synthesis efforts. All journal content is expected to be open by default, with replication-ready data and code made available in a public repository.

Access to data and research infrastructure

Use of ESRC-supported data resources and infrastructure is not a requirement of this funding opportunity. However, applicants who require access to data may wish to consider the range of ESRC-supported administrative data resources available and whether they could add value to their proposed research.

Administrative data can support analysis of economic outcomes (including productivity, earnings, employment and business growth), as well as wider public sector, health, social and distributional impacts. Researchers should ensure their research questions align with available data sources.

In particular, you may wish to consider Administrative Data Research UK (ADR UK), an ESRC-supported UK-wide partnership that is transforming access to public sector data for research in the public interest. ADR UK brings together ADR England, ADR Northern Ireland, ADR Scotland, ADR Wales and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) to facilitate secure access to linked administrative data for accredited researchers.

Potentially relevant datasets include:

Access to administrative data is subject to researcher and project accreditation.

You can become an accredited researcher by applying to the People and Project Service (PPS), which is supported by free training provided by the ONS. Once a researcher is accredited, applicants will need to have their project accredited to ensure it is feasible, legal, ethical and in the public interest. A project application can be submitted to the ONS SRS via the Project Accreditation Service for the SRS (PASS) platform.

Researchers should engage with data providers early to confirm data availability, feasibility and requirements associated with their chosen datasets. Access timelines should be factored into project plans; for datasets accessed through the ONS SRS, project approval can take around ten weeks where applications are sufficiently detailed and requirements are clear. However, timelines vary depending on project complexity, dataset requirements and time required for data owner approvals.

Researchers should also ensure they understand the access constraints associated with their selected datasets, including eligibility requirements, permitted uses, secure access arrangements and any limitations on data outputs. Research outputs produced using administrative data must go through the relevant output clearance processes before they can be released.

For ONS accreditation and approval queries, contact srs.customer.support@ons.gov.uk

For ONS dataset-specific queries, contact adrcuration@ons.gov.uk

Duration

The duration of this award is 24 months.

Projects must start by 1 April 2027.

Funding available

The FEC of your project can be up to £308,000.

UKRI will fund 80% of the FEC. The remaining 20% is expected to come from the project lead’s research organisation.

Mobility: UK and international

As research is an increasingly international endeavour, and as this funding opportunity specifically encourages researchers to engage with those funded by parallel international initiatives, we are keen to support grant holders in developing links with leading researchers in their field both in the UK and internationally.

We encourage research visits to one or more internationally leading research organisations – either in the UK or abroad – for the purposes of research collaboration, training, access to data or both, or other resources not available at the your host organisation.

We encourage research applications that use and develop international comparative methods. The opportunities provided for mobility should support this.

We also recognise that long-term mobility may be difficult or impossible for researchers with disabilities or caring responsibilities. You will therefore not be disadvantaged for not including a mobility element. In those instances, you may wish to consider alternative mechanisms for enhancing collaboration through your grant, such as hosting short visits from collaborators, or using information technology to develop and sustain collaborations.

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I)

UKRI is committed in ensuring that effective international collaboration in research and innovation takes place with integrity and within strong ethical frameworks. Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I) is a UKRI work programme designed to help protect all those working in our thriving and collaborative international sector by enabling partnerships to be as open as possible, and as secure as necessary. Our TR&I Principles set out UKRI’s expectations of organisations funded by UKRI in relation to due diligence for international collaboration.

As such, applicants for UKRI funding may be asked to demonstrate how their proposed projects will comply with our approach and expectation towards TR&I, identifying potential risks and the relevant controls you will put in place to help proportionately reduce these risks.

See further guidance and information about TR&I, including where applicants can find additional support.

ESRC data infrastructure

ESRC supports a range of data infrastructure. Where relevant, we encourage applicants to consider whether the use of these resources could add value to the project. See Facilities and resources for information on finding and using ESRC datasets which are available across the UK.

Where relevant, details of datasets and infrastructure to be used in your project should be given in the Facilities section.

Data requirements

ESRC recognises the importance of data quality and provenance. Data generated, collected or acquired by ESRC-funded research must be well-managed by the grant holder to enable their data to be exploited to the maximum potential for further research.  See our research data policy for details and further information on data requirements. The requirements of the research data policy are a condition of ESRC research funding.

Where relevant, details on data management and sharing should be provided in the Data Management section. See the importance of managing and sharing data and content for inclusion in a data management plan on the UK Data Service (UKDS) website for further guidance. We expect applicants to provide a summary of the points provided.  The UKDS (email: datasharing@ukdataservice.ac.uk) will be pleased to advise applicants on the availability of data within the academic community and provide advice on data deposit requirements.

Equitable partnership principles

When undertaking research and innovation activities outside the UK, you must recognise and address the possible impact of contextual, societal and cultural differences on the ethical conduct of those activities.

Researchers should also follow the principles of equitable partnerships to address inherent power imbalances when working with partners in resource-poor settings.

Applying the principles will encourage equitable access, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), while maintaining incentives for innovation. You should consider the principles from the start of the research and development cycle.

Read UKRI’s guidance on research in a global setting.

How to apply

We are running this funding opportunity on the new UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service so please ensure that your organisation is registered. You cannot apply on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system.

The project lead is responsible for completing the application process on the Funding Service, but we expect all team members and project partners to contribute to the application.

Only the lead research organisation can submit an application to UKRI.

To apply

Select ‘Start application’ near the beginning of this Funding finder page.

  1. Confirm you are the project lead.
  2. Sign in or create a Funding Service account. To create an account, select your organisation, verify your email address, and set a password.
  3. Answer questions directly in the text boxes. You can save your answers and come back to complete them or work offline and return to copy and paste your answers. If we need you to upload a document, follow the upload instructions in the Funding Service. All questions and assessment criteria are listed in the How to apply section on this Funding finder page.
  4. Allow enough time to check your application in ‘read-only’ view before sending to your research office.
  5. Send the completed application to your research office for checking. They will return it to you if it needs editing.
  6. Your research office will submit the completed and checked application to UKRI.

Please be aware that research office and finance teams undertake checks on hosting arrangements and financial eligibility. The ultimate responsibility for ensuring compliance with all opportunity requirements lies with the applicant.

Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant.

When including images, you must:

  • provide a descriptive caption or legend for each image immediately underneath it in the text box (this must be outside the image and counts towards your word limit)
  • insert each new image on a new line
  • use files smaller than 5MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format

Images should only be used to convey important visual information that cannot easily be put into words. The following are not permitted, and your application will be rejected if you include:

  • sentences or paragraphs of text
  • tables
  • excessive quantities of images

A few words are permitted where the image would lack clarity without the contextual words, such as a diagram, where text labels are required for an axis or graph column.

For more guidance on the Funding Service, see:

References

References should be included within the word count of the appropriate question section. You should use your discretion when including references and prioritise those most pertinent to the application.

Hyperlinks can be used in reference information. When including references, you should consider how your references will be viewed and used by the assessors, ensuring that:

  • references are easily identifiable by the assessors
  • references are formatted as appropriate to your research
  • persistent identifiers are used where possible

General use of hyperlinks

Applications should be self-contained. You should only use hyperlinks to link directly to reference information. You must not include links to web resources to extend your application. Assessors are not required to access links to conduct assessment or recommend a funding decision.

Generative artificial intelligence (AI)

Use of generative AI tools to prepare funding applications is permitted, however, caution should be applied.

For more information see our policy on the use of generative AI in application and assessment.

Deadline

UKRI must receive your application by 19 November 2026 at 4:00pm UK time.

You will not be able to apply after this time.

Make sure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines.

Following the submission of your application to this funding opportunity, your application cannot be changed, and submitted applications will not be amended. If your application does not follow the guidance, it may be rejected.

Personal data

Processing personal data

ESRC, as part of UKRI, will need to collect some personal information to manage your Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications.

We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.

Sensitive information

If you or a core team member need to tell us something you wish to remain confidential, please email EconomicROI@esrc.ukri.org

Include in the subject line: [the funding opportunity title; sensitive information; your Funding Service application number].

Typical examples of confidential information include:

  • individual is unavailable until a certain date (for example due to parental leave)
  • declaration of interest
  • additional information about eligibility to apply that would not be appropriately shared in the ‘Applicant and team capability’ section
  • conflict of interest for UKRI to consider in reviewer or panel participant selection
  • the application is an invited resubmission

For information about how UKRI handles personal data, read UKRI’s privacy notice.

Institutional matched funding

There is no requirement for matched funding from the institutions hosting the project lead, project co-leads or other staff employed on the application, beyond the standard 20% FEC. Expert reviewers and panels assessing UKRI funding applications must not consider levels of institutional matched funding as a factor on which to base recommendations. Direct and in-kind contributions from third party project partners are encouraged.

This policy does not remove the need for support from host organisations who must provide the necessary research environment and infrastructure for award-specific activities funded by UKRI. For example, research facilities, training and development of staff.

Publication of outcomes

ESRC, as part of UKRI, will publish the outcomes of this funding opportunity once all funding decisions have been communicated to applicants.

If your application is successful, we will publish some personal information on the UKRI Gateway to Research.

Summary

Word limit: 550

In plain English, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application.

We may make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, therefore do not include any confidential or sensitive information. Make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example:

  • opinion-formers
  • policymakers
  • the public
  • the wider research community

Guidance for writing a summary

Clearly describe your proposed work in terms of:

  • context
  • the challenge the project addresses
  • aims and objectives
  • potential applications and benefits

Core team

List the key members of your team and assign them roles from the following:

  • project lead (PL)
  • project co-lead (UK) (PcL)
  • project co-lead (international) (PcL (I))
  • research and innovation associate

Only list one individual as project lead.

Find out more about UKRI’s core team roles in funding applications.

Application questions

Vision

Word limit: 500

What are you hoping to achieve with your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how your proposed work:

  • is of excellent quality and importance within or beyond the field(s) or area(s)
  • has the potential to advance current understanding, or generate new knowledge, thinking or discovery within or beyond the field or area
  • is timely given current trends, context, and needs
  • impacts world-leading research, society, the economy, or the environment

References may be included within this section.

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the service.

Approach

Word limit: 2,500

How are you going to deliver your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how you have designed your approach so that it:

  • is effective and appropriate to achieve your objectives
  • is feasible, and comprehensively identifies any risks to delivery and how they will be managed
  • uses a clearly written and transparent methodology (if applicable)
  • summarises the previous work and describes how this will be built upon and progressed (if applicable)
  • will maximise translation of outputs into outcomes and impacts
  • describes how your, and if applicable your team’s, research environment (in terms of the place and relevance to the project) will contribute to the success of the work

Within the Approach section we also expect you to:

  • clearly describe both the framework and specific analysis methods proposed and explain the reasons for their choice. You should particularly mention any innovation in this or how different methodologies or methods may be combined
  • explain what steps you will take to provide opportunities for users to benefit from your research, and to ensure that your research has maximum economic and societal impact

All applicants planning to generate data as part of their grant must complete the separate Data management question.

References may be included within this section.

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the service.

Applicant and team capability to deliver

Word limit: 1,650

Why are you the right individual or team to successfully deliver the proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Evidence of how you, and if relevant your team, have:

  • the relevant experience (appropriate to career stage) to deliver the proposed work
  • the right balance of skills and expertise to cover the proposed work
  • the appropriate leadership and management skills to deliver the work and your approach to develop others
  • contributed to developing a positive research environment and wider community

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

The word limit for this section is 1,650 words: 1,150 words to be used for Résumé for Research and Innovation (R4RI) modules (including references) and, if necessary, a further 500 words for Additions.

Use the R4RI format to showcase the range of relevant skills you and, if relevant, your team (project and project co-leads, researchers, technicians, specialists, partners and so on) have and how this will help deliver the proposed work. You can include individuals’ specific achievements but only choose past contributions that best evidence their ability to deliver this work.

Complete this section using the R4RI module headings listed. Use each heading once and include a response for the whole team, see the UKRI guidance on R4RI. You should consider how to balance your answer, and emphasise where appropriate the key skills each team member brings:

  • contributions to the generation of new ideas, tools, methodologies, or knowledge
  • the development of others and maintenance of effective working relationships
  • contributions to the wider research and innovation community
  • contributions to broader research or innovation users and audiences and towards wider societal benefit
Additions

Provide any further details relevant to your application. This section is optional and can be up to 500 words. You should not use it to describe additional skills, experiences, or outputs, but you can use it to describe any factors that provide context for the rest of your R4RI (for example, details of career breaks if you wish to disclose them).

Complete this as a narrative. Do not format it like a CV.

References may be included within this section.

The roles in funding applications policy has descriptions of the different project roles.

Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)

What are the ethical and RRI considerations, implications and issues relating to the proposed work? If you do not think that the proposed work raises any ethical or RRI issues, explain why.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Demonstrate that you have identified and evaluated:

  • the relevant ethical and RRI considerations, including both the research or topic area itself and the design and delivery of the project
  • the wider implications of the proposed work, and how you will maximise the positive societal, environmental, and economic benefits arising from the project, whilst minimising unintended negative impacts, such as research misuse or accidental harm
  • how you will manage these considerations throughout the lifecycle of the project

You will be prompted to confirm whether your research will have potential misuse risks. If yes, you will be prompted to identify those risks and provide mitigation plans for the potential misuse.

Please refer to the UKRI position statement on funding ethical research and Responsible innovation for more information around our expectations on ethical and responsible research and innovation.

Animal involvement and “3Rs”

You must complete this section about how your proposed project will involve or impact animals.

If your project does not involve or impact animals, you will be able to confirm this.

You may be asked about:

  • what animals you are involving
  • the severity of the procedures you are using
  • where the procedures will take place
  • welfare standards you aim to meet
  • the relevance of your project to the development, validation or dissemination of the 3Rs

You may also need to download, complete, and upload at least one set of additional questions. You will be told how to do this towards the end of this section.

To complete this section and check whether your project is in the scope of the questions, refer to the UKRI policy for research and innovation involving animals.

What counts as an animal

UKRI policy relates to all animals in the Kingdom Animalia, including vertebrates and invertebrates.

Genetically modified organisms and biological research

You must complete this section if your project will include genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies.

If you project does not involve genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies, you will be able to confirm this.

You may be asked about:

  • the type of organism your project will involve and the procedures your project will include
  • the intended use of the organism or genetic technology
  • the genetic, biological and environmental risks of your project

For more information, see UKRI’s guidance on genetic technologies.

Human participation in health-related research

You must complete this section about whether your project will include human participation.

If your project does not involve human participation, you will be able to confirm this.

You may be asked about:

  • what type of human participation your project includes
  • the project design for human participation
  • the phase of the clinical trial
  • whether the project will be in an NHS setting, if so, how the project will be registered
  • whether diversity and inclusion will be considered

For more information, see UKRI’s guidance for human participants in research.

Resources and cost justification

Word limit: 1,000

What will you need to deliver your proposed work and how much will it cost?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Justify the application’s more costly resources, in particular:

  • project staff
  • significant travel for field work or collaboration (but not regular travel between collaborating organisations or to conferences)
  • any equipment that will cost more than £25,000
  • any consumables beyond typical requirements, or that are required in exceptional quantities
  • all facilities and infrastructure costs
  • all resources that have been costed as ‘Exceptions’

You can request costs associated with reasonable adjustments where they increase as a direct result of working on the project. For further information see Disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders. Where a funding limit is imposed on the opportunity, requested costs for reasonable adjustments may exceed the maximum funding amount.

Assessors are not looking for detailed costs or a line-by-line breakdown of all project resources. Overall, they want you to demonstrate how the resources you anticipate needing for your proposed work:

  • are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
  • represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
  • maximise potential outcomes and impacts

For detailed guidance on eligible costs please see the ESRC Research Funding Guide.

Project partners

Add details about any project partners’ contributions. If there are no project partners, you can indicate this on the Funding Service.

A project partner is a collaborating organisation who will have an integral role in the proposed research. This may include direct contributions for example cash, donated equipment and resources, or staff seconded to the project, or indirect and in-kind contributions for example use of project partner’s equipment, datasets, or facilities. Project partners may be in industry, academia, third sector or government organisations in the UK or overseas, including partners based in the EU.

Add the following project partner details:

  • the organisation name and address (searchable via a drop-down list or enter the organisation’s details manually, as applicable)
  • the project partner contact name and email address
  • the type of contribution (direct or indirect) and its monetary value

If a detail is entered incorrectly and you have saved the entry, remove the specific project partner record and re-add it with the correct information.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

Project partners letters or emails of support

Upload a single PDF containing the letters or emails of support from each partner you named in the Project Partner section. These should be uploaded in English or Welsh only.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Enter the words ‘attachment supplied’ in the text box, or if you do not have any project partners enter ‘N/A’. Each letter or email you provide should:

  • confirm the partner’s commitment to the project
  • clearly explain the value, relevance, and possible benefits of the work to them
  • describe any additional value that they bring to the project
  • be no more than one A4 page in length

The Funding Service will provide document upload details when you apply. If you do not have any project partners, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.

Ensure you have prior agreement from project partners so that, if you are offered funding, they will support your project as indicated in the project partners’ section.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

Do not provide letters of support from host and project co-leads’ research organisations.

Data management and sharing

Word limit: 500

How will you manage and share data collected or acquired through the proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Provide a data management plan that clearly details how you will comply with UKRI’s published data sharing policy, which includes detailed guidance notes.

Demonstrate that you have designed your proposed work so that you can appropriately manage and share data in accordance with ESRC’s Research Data Policy and ESRC Framework for Research Ethics (if applicable)

Within the ‘Data management’ section we also expect you to:

  • plan for the research through the life cycle of the award until data is accepted for archiving by the UK Data Service (UKDS) or a responsible data repository
  • demonstrate  compliance with ESRC’s Research Data Policy and ESRC Framework for Research Ethics. This should include confirmation that existing datasets have been reviewed and why currently available datasets are inadequate for the proposed research
  • cover any legal and ethical considerations of collecting, releasing or storing the data, including consent, confidentiality, anonymisation, security and other ethical issues
  • include any challenges to data sharing (for example, copyright or data confidentiality), with possible solutions discussed to optimise data sharing

If this does not apply to your proposed work, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.

Facilities

Word limit: 250

Does your proposed research require the support and use of a facility? This includes ESRC data infrastructure investments.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

If you will need to use a facility, follow your proposed facility’s normal access request procedures. Ensure you have prior agreement so that if you are offered funding, they will support the use of their facility on your project.

For each requested facility you will need to provide the:

  • name of facility, copied and pasted from the facility information list (DOCX, 43KB)
  • proposed usage or costs, or costs per unit where indicated on the facility   information list
  • confirmation you have their agreement where required

Facilities should only be named if they are on the facility information list above. If you will not need to use a facility, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I)

Trusted Research and Innovation is the protection of the UK’s intellectual property, sensitive research, people, and infrastructure from potential theft, misuse, and exploitation.

Organisations receiving UKRI funding are obliged to act in line with UK government legislation. They are also expected to undertake appropriate due diligence assessments of organisations involved in research partnerships, collaboration agreements, and commercial contracts.

You will be asked about:

  • which areas of the National Security and Investment (NSI) Act your project relates to
  • who you intend to collaborate with and how
  • if your project requires an export control licence

Your answers may affect the T&Cs of your funding agreement if you are successful. We may use your answers to determine that our current T&Cs are sufficient or if additional T&Cs are required.

How we will assess your application

Assessment process

We will assess your application using the following process:

Eligibility checks

All submitted applications will be initially checked for funding eligibility. Any applications that do not meet the eligibility criteria will not progress to panel assessment.

Panel

Assessment panel members will be recruited to review your application against the specified criteria for this funding opportunity. ESRC will appoint the assessment panel members.

Panel members will initially assess each application independently. ESRC may shortlist applications for discussion by the panel, depending on submission volume and range of pre-scores received. At the panel meeting, the panel then will collectively agree final scores for each application. All applications that score seven or higher will be eligible for funding. Funding recommendations will be formed by the final rank list of scores.

This assessment process will not include an applicant response.

This funding opportunity aims to fund eight awards. ESRC will make the final funding decision.

For more information on how we prioritise applications for funding please visit How we make decisions.

Timescale

We aim to complete the assessment process by the end of February 2027.

Feedback

If your application was discussed by the panel, we will give feedback with the outcome of your application, via email.

Principles of assessment

We support the San Francisco declaration on research assessment (DORA) and recognise the relationship between research assessment and research integrity.

Find out about the UKRI Principles of Assessment and Decision Making.

Using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in expert review

Generative AI may be used only for the purpose of language refinement during application assessment. When using generative AI to refine the language of a review, expert reviewers and panellists must ensure that:

  • no part of the application being assessed is entered into a generative AI tool
  • no personal information from the application is disclosed
  • generative AI is not tasked with understanding, summarising or evaluating the application’s content

Expert reviewers and panellists must also:

  • comply with relevant intellectual property and data protection legislation
  • not take into account or speculate within their assessment whether generative AI has been used to develop the application

For more detail see our policy on the use of generative AI.

We reserve the right to modify the assessment process as needed.

Assessment areas

The assessment areas we will use are:

  • Vision
  • Approach
  • Applicant and team capability to deliver
  • Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)
  • Resources and cost justification
  • Data management and sharing

Find details of assessment questions and criteria under the ‘Application questions’ heading in the ‘How to apply’ section.

Contact details

Get help with your application

If you have a question and the answers aren’t provided on this page.

The helpdesk is committed to helping users of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service as effectively and as quickly as possible. In order to manage cases at peak volume times, the helpdesk will triage and prioritise those queries with an imminent opportunity deadline or a technical issue. Enquiries raised where information is available on the Funding finder opportunity page and should be understood early in the application process (for example, regarding eligibility, content or remit of a funding opportunity) will not constitute a priority case and will be addressed as soon as possible.

Contact Details

For help and advice on costings and writing your proposal please contact your research office in the first instance, allowing sufficient time for your organisation’s submission process.

For questions related to this specific funding opportunity please contact EconomicROI@esrc.ukri.org

Any queries regarding the system or the submission of applications through the Funding Service should be directed to the helpdesk.

Email: support@funding-service.ukri.org

Phone: 01793 547490

Our phone lines are open:

  • Monday to Thursday 8:30am to 5:00pm
  • Friday 8:30am to 4:30pm

To help us process queries quicker, we request that users highlight the council and opportunity name in the subject title of their email query, include the application reference number, and refrain from contacting more than one mailbox at a time.

For further information on submitting an application read How applicants use the Funding Service.

Additional info

Background

This funding opportunity is supported through the UK Metascience Unit. Metascience is a rapidly expanding research field that draws on a wide range of disciplinary expertise to understand how research is conducted, funded and supported, and how these practices can be enhanced or improved. For a deeper understanding of what metascience means to UKRI, please see the UK Metascience Unit’s report.

This funding opportunity is solely supported by UKRI but has been developed in collaboration with the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and Coefficient Giving as part of an international research challenge. UKRI award holders will be encouraged to engage with award holders funded directly by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and Coefficient Giving.

Research and innovation impact

Impact can be defined as the long-term intended or unintended effect research and innovation has on society, economy and the environment; to individuals, organisations, and the wider global population.

Supporting documents

EIA for the opportunity (PDF, 240KB)

Research disruption due to COVID-19

We recognise that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused major interruptions and disruptions across our communities. We are committed to ensuring that individual applicants and their wider team, including partners and networks, are not penalised for any disruption to their career, such as:

  • breaks and delays
  • disruptive working patterns and conditions
  • the loss of ongoing work
  • role changes that may have been caused by the pandemic

Reviewers and panel members will be advised to consider the unequal impacts that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the capability to deliver and career development of those individuals included in the application. They will be asked to consider the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the research they are proposing.

Where disruptions have occurred, you can highlight this within your application if you wish, but there is no requirement to detail the specific circumstances that caused the disruption.

This is the website for UKRI: our seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help improve our online products and services.