Funding opportunity

Funding opportunity: Aviation’s non-CO2 impacts on the climate 2026

Apply for funding to deliver collaborative research which focuses on the underpinning science of aviation’s non-carbon dioxide (non-CO2) impacts to identify benefits, mitigation options, informing industry and government policy decisions.

You must be:

  • based at a UK research organisation eligible for Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) funding
  • in a role that meets the individual eligibility requirements

The full economic cost (FEC) of your project can be up to £385,425. We will fund 80% of the FEC (meaning, £308,340).

Projects must begin by no later than 1 February 2027 and last for no more than 14 months.

Who can apply

This opportunity is open to organisations with standard eligibility. Check if your organisation is eligible.

Who is eligible to apply

This funding opportunity is open to research groups and individuals. We:

  • encourage interdisciplinary research and collaborations with other UK organisations
  • welcome applications from individuals at any career stage, subject to NERC eligibility criteria

You may be involved in no more than two applications submitted to this funding opportunity. Only one of these can be as project lead.

Project partners fund their own involvement. We will only fund minor incidental expenses, such as some travel costs, if needed for project partners.

You should include all UK partners not based at approved eligible organisations or international collaborators as project partners. This includes organisations from the business or industrial sectors.

Sub-contracting aspects of the work, meaning particular goods and services, to non-eligible institutions is possible, in line with the NERC research grants and fellowships handbook.

Projects incorporating funded industrial partners will be eligible for the Non-CO2 programme delivered by the Aerospace Technology Institute (ATI) which is part of the same research programme. See the ‘What we are looking for’ section for more detail.

Equality, diversity and inclusion

We are committed to achieving equality of opportunity for all funding applicants. We encourage applications from a diverse range of researchers.

We support people to work in a way that suits their personal circumstances. This includes:

  • career breaks
  • support for people with caring responsibilities
  • flexible working
  • alternative working patterns

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) can offer disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders during the application and assessment process.

What we're looking for

Demand management

Demand management is not currently being applied to this funding opportunity. However, should the level of interest exceed what can be managed within the assessment process, UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) may introduce limits on the number of applications that can be submitted. Further details will be clearly communicated where this is the case. UKRI encourages organisations to support applicants in preparing well-planned, high-quality applications that are competitive for funding relative to the funding opportunity.

Scope

There is continuing scientific uncertainty regarding the magnitude of aviation’s non-CO2 impacts on the climate, and the UK government has committed to improving their understanding of aviation’s non-CO2 impacts and to identify and develop policy options and measures to mitigate these impacts.

This research programme, in partnership with the Department for Transport (DfT) and the Department for Business and Trade (DBT), focuses on aviation’s non-CO2 impacts.

The programme supports research aimed at reducing the non-CO2 climate impacts from aviation, the impacts of which could be greater than CO2 emissions. It seeks to establish how the non-CO2 impacts interact with climate over time, and how to mitigate their impacts with the view to informing industry funding and government policy and investment decisions.

This is the third of three academic-led research opportunities in the current programme. Proposals that build on the existing portfolio by strengthening validation, addressing uncertainties, and decision relevance, rather than duplicating current areas of activity, are particularly encouraged.

For more information on the background of this funding opportunity, as well as information on the programme design, go to the ‘Additional information’ section.

Themes

You can address one or more themes set out below and must cover at least one of the three themes for this funding opportunity.

Applications related to multiple themes as well as those with industrial partnerships are encouraged. Short descriptions of the projects already funded can be found on the Aviation Non-CO2 Research programme website. We will not fund new projects which directly duplicate research funded to date under this programme; see further information within this section to clarify this detail.

Your project should be focused on technology readiness levels (TRL) 1 to 4. However, proposals should identify how the results obtained will support higher TRL research (for example, that supported by the Aerospace Technology Institute (ATI)) and lead to reduced climate impacts of non-CO2 aviation emissions.

Applications can be related to fossil fuel powered aircraft, Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) powered aircraft and or zero-carbon emission aircraft. Applications should focus on civil aviation (passenger or cargo flight) and research in wider sectors where it is applicable to civil aviation. You should not seek to undertake research on aviation CO2 emissions, unless appropriate for the purposes of better understanding a non-CO2 issue.

Theme one: increased confidence in contrail and aerosol prediction

There is a recognised need to strengthen confidence in how predictions of contrails and the role of aerosols are interpreted and used, and not simply to improve prediction accuracy. You should focus on understanding and characterising uncertainty, robustness, and decision relevance, including:

  • when predictions can be relied upon
  • where limitations arise
  • how uncertainty affects mitigation outcomes in practice

You should consider recognising failure modes, model dependent differences, and potential unintended consequences, to better distinguish approaches that are ready for wider operational testing from those that still require further evidence.

Existing funded work within this research programme currently addresses some potentially overlapping areas, including:

  • aspects of contrail formation
  • the role of aerosols
  • cloud persistence
  • radiative impact

Existing projects are currently focused on observational constraints, modelling advances, and uncertainty in contrail and aerosol impacts.

You should clearly articulate how your application would extend beyond existing activity. For example, but not limited to:

  • addressing specific gaps in validation
  • uncertainty characterisation
  • applicability under operational conditions
  • quantifying uncertainty
  • sensitivity and limits of applicability in contrail prediction for mitigation approaches

Research that supports independent benchmarking or inter comparison of contrail models can provide valuable insights. Applications here may apply multiple approaches to shared datasets or case studies to identify systematic differences, structural biases, and areas of convergence or divergence relevant to operational use.

We encourage applications to this theme which aim to help distinguish contrail mitigation approaches by decision readiness (including assessment of failure modes, risks of false positives or negatives), and potential unintended climate trade offs. In so doing clarifying which approaches are sufficiently mature for wider operational testing, and which require further evidence.

Theme two: future fuels

Further evidence is needed to enhance quantitative understanding of how current and future fuels influence aviation’s non CO2 effects, through changes in exhaust composition and subsequent atmospheric processes. This includes getting an improved understanding of how fuel composition affects particulate emissions (in both non-volatile and volatile particulate matter) sulphur-derived species and water vapour. Emphasis should be on identifying how these changes filter through to climate relevant outcomes.

You should make clear what uncertainty is reduced and what new evidence will be generated. For example, through data, parameterisation or validation.

The research programme has already funded a substantial body of work addressing fuel composition and non CO2 effects alongside related government-commissioned work on aromatics. Your proposal should demonstrate clearly how it addresses the remaining evidence gaps rather than revisiting covered areas. We encourage applications that explicitly consider trade offs or unintended consequences across multiple non CO2 pathways (rather than focusing on a single mechanism), recognising that mitigation of one effect may influence others.

Your project may cover some of the following. However, the scope is not limited to these bullets alone. You should be clear in your response what you are planning to address:

Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) and particulate emissions

Additional research that strengthens the understanding of:

  • evidence chain from fuel properties
  • emitted aerosol populations
  • cloud interactions
  • climate impacts
  • policy development and decision-making which build upon the climate impact of cruise-altitude nitrogen oxides
Hydrogen combustion

Further research is needed to improve understanding of water vapour emissions and nitrogen oxides formation at cruise, including their implications for ice nucleation pathways, ice particle formation and subsequent cloud development, and how these processes vary spatially and temporally with atmospheric background state.

Hydrogen fuel cell systems

The evidence base on the climate relevance of water exhaust alone remains limited. Proposals are invited which focus on water exhaust behaviour, dispersion and microphysical impacts from fuel cell aircraft. Further understanding in this area will help avoid reliance on assumptions derived from conventional engine plume behaviour.

Direct stratospheric water vapour forcing

Forcing is assessed as small for present day aviation, producing a positive radiative forcing that is highly sensitive to emission altitude and atmospheric transport. However, there are evidence gaps on how applicable current evidence will be to future fuels and zero emission aircraft and current research evidence is not sufficiently well-defined to provide robust policy decisions. Projects are invited which advance confidence in this forcing to improve monitoring and reporting frameworks for non CO2 impacts, as these are developed with future advancement in fuels and zero emission aircraft.

Theme three: underpinning decision-making

Projects under this theme should aim to better our understanding of atmospheric science specifically to help improve decision-making related to reducing the non-CO2 climate impacts of aviation. Projects must also ensure they are oriented to meeting the goals of the overall research programme:

  • improving our understanding of aviation’s non-CO2 impacts and reducing the current scientific uncertainties
  • identifying and developing mitigating actions to address those impacts

Your project should be targeted at particular groups or a range of stakeholders. For example, policy, airlines, manufacturers, energy companies. You may focus on, but are not limited to:

  • operational decisions (pre-flight and in-flight)
  • design decisions (aircraft or propulsion related)
  • fuel composition
  • future fuels
  • policy decision support
  • intercomparisons of models used to support such decisions

Your projects should aim to improve overall understanding by bringing together different research strands. This may include aligning scientific and operational analysis of mitigation concepts and their real world feasibility.

Projects are encouraged to focus on approaches that address:

  • scalability
  • transferability
  • net climate benefit (including explicit consideration of CO2 trade offs, system level constraints, and operational feasibility)

Metrics and equivalence frameworks for non CO2 impacts are already an active area of research within the programme, in recognition that no single metric is universally suitable across all contexts. Projects addressing this theme should focus on how metrics are applied and interpreted, rather than developing new metrics and frameworks. This may include the treatment and communication of uncertainty, confidence and timescales, rather than developing new standalone metrics in isolation.

Research in this area that explicitly supports risk informed decision making, for example in operational planning, monitoring and reporting, or future policy development, should provide strong complementarity to existing scientific studies and ongoing European activities. Your project should acknowledge where these links, beneficiaries and complementarities occur and avoid duplication.

Duration

The duration of this award is a maximum of 14 months.

Projects should start no later than 1 February 2027.

Funding available

The FEC of your project can be up to £385,425.

We will fund 80% of the FEC (meaning, £308,340) with the exception that eligible costs for international project co-lead involvement would be funded at 100%.

This funding opportunity sources its funds from the NERC budget.

We anticipate funding up to six projects. This is expected to be a minimum of one project under each theme. The programme expert advisory group (EAG) will make recommendations for a balanced portfolio to the funders, who will make the final funding decision. The funders may increase the number of projects supported through this opportunity should further budget become available and if submissions are sufficient high quality.

What we will fund

We will fund facilities costs as part of this funding opportunity.

What we will not fund

We will not fund:

  • PhD studentship costs
  • cruise costs
  • requests for equipment of £25,000 and over are not part of this funding opportunity. You should request smaller items of equipment (under £25,000 individually) under ‘Consumables (other directly incurred costs)’ in your application

Services and facilities

You can apply to use a facility or resource in your funding application.

You should discuss your application with the facility or service as soon as possible and ideally two months before the funding opportunity’s closing date to:

  • discuss the proposed work in detail
  • receive confirmation that they can provide the services required within the timeframe of the funding

The facility will provide a technical assessment that includes the calculated cost of providing the service. NERC services and facilities must be costed within the limits of the funding.

You should not submit the technical assessment with the application, but you must confirm you have received it.

For more information, see the NERC research grants and fellowships handbook.

Read the full list of NERC facilities that require a technical assessment.

High Performance Computing (HPC), and the large research facilities at Harwell have their own policies for access and costing.

Note the ARCHER2 service end date is 21 November 2026. Where you require HPC provision after November 2026, you are advised to explore alternative provisions such as other UKRI provisions listed or commercial HPC services. Where you are seeking to use other UKRI provisions then you must adhere to the relevant access process. Where you are seeking to use commercial HPC services then the full cost of access to commercial HPC services must be included in your application.

UKRI provisions include:

See also, other HPC facilities that are available to UK researchers.

Supporting skills and talent

We encourage you to follow the principles of the Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers and the Technician Commitment.

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I)

UKRI is committed in ensuring that effective international collaboration in research and innovation takes place with integrity and within strong ethical frameworks. Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I) is a UKRI work programme designed to help protect all those working in our thriving and collaborative international sector by enabling partnerships to be as open as possible, and as secure as necessary. Our TR&I Principles set out UKRI’s expectations of organisations funded by UKRI in relation to due diligence for international collaboration.

As such, applicants for UKRI funding may be asked to demonstrate how their proposed projects will comply with our approach and expectation towards TR&I, identifying potential risks and the relevant controls you will put in place to help proportionately reduce these risks.

See further guidance and information about TR&I, including where applicants can find additional support.

Data management

You must adhere to UKRI open research policy and NERC data policy and complete the ‘Data management and sharing’ question.

For details of data centres, see the NERC Environmental Data Service.

We will pay the data centre directly on behalf of the programme for archival and curation services, but you should ensure that you request sufficient resource to cover preparation of data for archiving by the research team. Additional services from the data centres, such as database development or a specialist in project data management during your project, will need to be discussed with the relevant data centre prior to submission, costs for additional services will need to be funded from your grant.

Responsible research

Through our funding processes, we seek to make a positive contribution to society and the environment. This is not just through research outputs and outcomes but through the way in which research is conducted and facilities managed.

All NERC grant holders are to adopt responsible research practices as set out in the NERC responsible business statement.

Responsible research is defined as reducing harm or enhancing benefit on the environment and society through effective management of research activities and facilities. Specifically, this covers:

  • the natural environment
  • the local community
  • equality, diversity and inclusion

You should consider the responsible research context of your project, not the host institution as a whole. You should take action to enhance your responsible research approach where practical and reasonable.

How to apply

We are running this funding opportunity on the new UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service so please ensure that your organisation is registered. You cannot apply on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system.

The project lead is responsible for completing the application process on the Funding Service, but we expect all team members and project partners to contribute to the application.

Only the lead research organisation can submit an application to UKRI.

To apply

Select ‘Start application’ near the beginning of this Funding finder page.

  1. Confirm you are the project lead.
  2. Sign in or create a Funding Service account. To create an account, select your organisation, verify your email address, and set a password.
  3. Answer questions directly in the text boxes. You can save your answers and come back to complete them or work offline and return to copy and paste your answers. If we need you to upload a document, follow the upload instructions in the Funding Service. All questions and assessment criteria are listed in the How to apply section on this Funding finder page.
  4. Allow enough time to check your application in ‘read-only’ view before sending to your research office.
  5. Send the completed application to your research office for checking. They will return it to you if it needs editing.
  6. Your research office will submit the completed and checked application to UKRI.

Please be aware that research office and finance teams undertake checks on hosting arrangements and financial eligibility. The ultimate responsibility for ensuring compliance with all opportunity requirements lies with the applicant.

Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant.

When including images, you must:

  • provide a descriptive caption or legend for each image immediately underneath it in the text box (this must be outside the image and counts towards your word limit)
  • insert each new image on a new line
  • use files smaller than 5MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format

Images should only be used to convey important visual information that cannot easily be put into words. The following are not permitted, and your application will be rejected if you include:

  • sentences or paragraphs of text
  • tables
  • excessive quantities of images

A few words are permitted where the image would lack clarity without the contextual words, such as a diagram, where text labels are required for an axis or graph column.

For more guidance on the Funding Service, see:

References

References should be included within the word count of the appropriate question section. You should use your discretion when including references and prioritise those most pertinent to the application.

Hyperlinks can be used in reference information. When including references, you should consider how your references will be viewed and used by the assessors, ensuring that:

  • references are easily identifiable by the assessors
  • references are formatted as appropriate to your research
  • persistent identifiers are used where possible
  • General use of hyperlinks

Applications should be self-contained. You should only use hyperlinks to link directly to reference information. You must not include links to web resources to extend your application. Assessors are not required to access links to conduct assessment or recommend a funding decision.

Generative artificial intelligence (AI)

Use of generative AI tools to prepare funding applications is permitted, however, caution should be applied.

For more information see our policy on the use of generative AI in application and assessment.

Deadline

We must receive your application by 8 September 2026 at 4:00pm UK time.

You will not be able to apply after this time.

Make sure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines.

Following the submission of your application to this funding opportunity, your application cannot be changed, and submitted applications will not be amended. If your application does not follow the guidance, it may be rejected.

Personal data

Processing personal data

NERC, as part of UKRI, will need to collect some personal information to manage your Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications.

We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.

NERC, as part of UKRI, will need to share the application and any personal information that it contains with programme partners so they can participate in the assessment of this funding opportunity:

  • Department for Transport (DfT), Department for Business and Trade (DBT), Aerospace Technology Institute (ATI)
  • the programme expert advisory group (EAG) who will advise the funders on a balanced portfolio of investments from the fundable projects

For more information on how DfT, DBT and ATI use personal information, visit:

Sensitive information

If you or a core team member need to tell us something you wish to remain confidential, email aviation@nerc.ukri.org

Include in the subject line: Aviation non-CO2 funding opportunity; sensitive information; your Funding Service application number.

Typical examples of confidential information include:

  • individual is unavailable until a certain date (for example due to parental leave)
  • declaration of interest
  • additional information about eligibility to apply that would not be appropriately shared in the ‘Applicant and team capability’ section
  • conflict of interest for UKRI to consider in reviewer or panel participant selection

For information about how UKRI handles personal data, read UKRI’s privacy notice.

Institutional matched funding

There is no requirement for matched funding from the institutions hosting the project lead, project co-leads or other staff employed on the application, beyond the standard 20% FEC. Expert reviewers and panels assessing UKRI funding applications must not consider levels of institutional matched funding as a factor on which to base recommendations. Direct and in-kind contributions from third party project partners are encouraged.

This policy does not remove the need for support from host organisations who must provide the necessary research environment and infrastructure for award-specific activities funded by UKRI. For example, research facilities, training and development of staff.

Publication of outcomes

NERC, as part of UKRI, will publish the outcomes of this funding opportunity at What NERC has funded.

If your application is successful, we will publish some personal information on the UKRI Gateway to Research.

Summary

Word limit: 550

In plain English, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application.

We usually make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, therefore do not include any confidential or sensitive information. Make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example:

  • opinion-formers
  • policymakers
  • the public
  • the wider research community

Guidance for writing a summary

Clearly describe your proposed work in terms of:

  • context
  • the challenge the project addresses
  • aims and objectives
  • potential applications and benefits

Core team

List the key members of your team and assign them roles from the following:

  • project lead (PL)
  • project co-lead (UK) (PcL)
  • project co-lead (international) (PcL (I))
  • specialist
  • grant manager
  • professional enabling staff
  • research and innovation associate
  • technician
  • visiting researcher
  • researcher co-lead (RcL)

Only list one individual as project lead.

UKRI has introduced a new addition to the ‘Specialist’ role type. Public contributors such as people with lived experience can now be added to an application.

Find out more about UKRI’s core team roles in funding applications.

Application questions

Vision

Word limit: 1,000

What are you hoping to achieve with your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how your proposed work:

  • is of excellent quality and importance within or beyond the field(s) or area(s)
  • has the potential to advance current understanding, or generate new knowledge, thinking or discovery within or beyond the field or area
  • is timely given current trends, context, and needs
  • impacts world-leading research, society, the economy, or the environment

Within this section we also expect you to:

  • indicate clearly how your application fits the scope of this funding opportunity, specifically
  • which theme or themes you are addressing
  • identify the potential direct or indirect benefits and who the beneficiaries might be

References may be included within this section.

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Approach

Word limit: 1,000

How are you going to deliver your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how you have designed your approach so that it:

  • is effective and appropriate to achieve your objectives
  • is feasible, and comprehensively identifies any risks to delivery and how they will be managed
  • uses a clearly written and transparent methodology (if applicable)
  • summarises the previous work and describes how this will be built upon and progressed (if applicable)
  • will maximise translation of outputs into outcomes and impacts
  • describes how your, and if applicable your team’s, research environment (in terms of the place and relevance to the project) will contribute to the success of the work

Within this section we also expect you to:

  • demonstrate that it is effective and appropriate to achieve your objectives, and in relation to the scope of this funding opportunity
  • demonstrate access to the appropriate services, facilities, infrastructure, or equipment to deliver the proposed work
  • provide a project plan including milestones and timelines in the form of a Gantt chart or similar

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

References may be included within this section.

Applicant and team capability to deliver

Word limit: 1,650

Why are you the right individual or team to successfully deliver the proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Evidence of how you, and if relevant your team, have:

  • the relevant experience (appropriate to career stage) to deliver the proposed work
  • the right balance of skills and expertise to cover the proposed work
  • the appropriate leadership and management skills to deliver the work and your approach to develop others
  • contributed to developing a positive research environment and wider community

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

The word limit for this section is 1,650 words: 1,150 words to be used for Résumé for Research and Innovation (R4RI) modules (including references) and, if necessary, a further 500 words for Additions.

Use the R4RI format to showcase the range of relevant skills you and, if relevant, your team (project and project co-leads, researchers, technicians, specialists, partners and so on) have and how this will help deliver the proposed work. You can include individuals’ specific achievements but only choose past contributions that best evidence their ability to deliver this work.

Complete this section using the R4RI module headings listed. Use each heading once and include a response for the whole team, see the UKRI guidance on R4RI. You should consider how to balance your answer, and emphasise where appropriate the key skills each team member brings:

  • contributions to the generation of new ideas, tools, methodologies, or knowledge
  • the development of others and maintenance of effective working relationships
  • contributions to the wider research and innovation community
  • contributions to broader research or innovation users and audiences and towards wider societal benefit
Additions

Provide any further details relevant to your application. This section is optional and can be up to 500 words. You should not use it to describe additional skills, experiences, or outputs, but you can use it to describe any factors that provide context for the rest of your R4RI (for example, details of career breaks if you wish to disclose them).

Complete this as a narrative. Do not format it like a CV.

References may be included within this section.

The roles in funding applications policy has descriptions of the different project roles.

Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)

What are the ethical and RRI considerations, implications and issues relating to the proposed work? If you do not think that the proposed work raises any ethical or RRI issues, explain why.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Demonstrate that you have identified and evaluated:

  • the relevant ethical and RRI considerations, including both the research or topic area itself and the design and delivery of the project
  • the wider implications of the proposed work, and how you will maximise the positive societal, environmental, and economic benefits arising from the project, whilst minimising unintended negative impacts, such as research misuse or accidental harm
  • how you will manage these considerations throughout the lifecycle of the project

If you are collecting or using data you should identify:

  • any legal and ethical considerations of collecting, releasing and storing the data (including consent, confidentiality, anonymisation, security and other ethical considerations and, in particular, strategies to not preclude further reuse of data)
  • formal information standards that your proposed work will comply with
    You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Please refer to the UKRI position statement on funding ethical research and Responsible innovation for more information around our expectations on ethical and responsible research and innovation.

Animal involvement and “3Rs”

You must complete this section about how your proposed project will involve or impact animals.

If your project does not involve or impact animals, you must confirm this on the next page.

You may be asked about:

  • what animals you are involving
  • the severity of the procedures you are using
  • where the procedures will take place
  • welfare standards you aim to meet
  • the relevance of your project to the development, validation or dissemination of the 3Rs

You may also need to download, complete, and upload at least one set of additional questions. You will be told how to do this towards the end of this section.

To complete this section and check whether your project is in the scope of the questions, refer to the UKRI policy for research and innovation involving animals.

What counts as an animal

UKRI policy relates to all animals in the Kingdom Animalia, including vertebrates and invertebrates.

Genetically modified organisms and biological risk

You must complete this section if your project will include genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies.

If you project does not involve genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies, you must confirm this on the next page.

You may be asked about:

  • the type of organism your project will involve and the procedures your project will include
  • the intended use of the organism or genetic technology
  • the genetic, biological and environmental risks of your project

For more information, see UKRI’s guidance on genetic technologies.

Human participation in health-related research

You must complete this section about whether your project will include human participation.

If your project does not involve human participation, you must confirm this on the next page.

You may be asked about:

  • what type of human participation your project includes
  • the project design for human participation
  • the phase of the clinical trial
  • whether the project will be in an NHS setting, if so, how the project will be registered
  • whether diversity and inclusion will be considered

For more information, see UKRI’s guidance for human participants in research.

Facilities

Word limit: 500

Does your proposed research require the support and use of a facility?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

If you will need to use a research council facility, follow your proposed facility’s normal access request procedures. Ensure you have prior agreement so that if you are offered funding, they will support the use of their facility on your project.

For each requested facility you will need to provide the:

  • name of facility, copied and pasted from the facility information list (DOCX, 42KB)
  • proposed usage or costs, or costs per unit where indicated on the facility information list
  • confirmation you have their agreement where required

If you have to attach a facility form, then upload it as a PDF. If you need to upload multiple forms, then combine them into a single PDF.

Facilities should only be named if they are on the facility information list. If you do not need to use a facility, simply add ‘N/A’ into the text box, mark this section as complete and move to the next section.

Upload guidance

Upload a single PDF containing facility forms ensuring it is no larger than 8MB, if applicable.

For the file name, use the Funding Service number the system gives to your application when you create an application, immediately followed by the words ‘facility forms’. Then use the ‘upload’ button.

Unless specifically requested, do not include any personal data within the attachment.

Once you have uploaded, mark this section as complete and move to the next one.

Data management and sharing

Word limit: 500

How will you manage and share data collected or acquired through the proposed research?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Provide a data management plan that clearly details how you will comply with UKRI’s published data sharing policy, which includes detailed guidance notes.

Indicate:

  • which NERC data centre is required to archive the data
  • whether the total volume of data is likely to be larger than 1TB
  • any other detail on how you will comply with NERC data policy

Project partners

Add details about any project partners’ contributions. If there are no project partners, you can indicate this on the Funding Service.

A project partner is a collaborating organisation who will have an integral role in the proposed research. This may include direct contributions for example cash, donated equipment and resources, or staff seconded to the project, or indirect and in-kind contributions for example use of project partner’s equipment, datasets, or facilities. Project partners may be in industry, academia, third sector or government organisations in the UK or overseas, including partners based in the EU.

Add the following project partner details:

  • organisation name and address (searchable via a drop-down list or enter the organisation’s details manually, as applicable)
  • project partner contact name and email address
  • type of contribution (direct or in-direct) and its monetary value

If a detail is entered incorrectly and you have saved the entry, remove the specific project partner record and re-add it with the correct information.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

Resources and cost justification

Word limit: 1,750

What will you need to deliver your proposed work and how much will it cost?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Justify the application’s more costly resources, in particular:

  • project staff
  • significant travel for field work or collaboration (but not regular travel between collaborating organisations or to conferences)
  • any consumables beyond typical requirements, or that are required in exceptional quantities
  • all facilities and infrastructure costs
  • all resources that have been costed as ‘Exceptions’

You can request costs associated with reasonable adjustments where they increase as a direct result of working on the project. For further information see Disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders. Where a funding limit is imposed on the opportunity, requested costs for reasonable adjustments may exceed the maximum funding amount.

You should include costs (travel and subsistence) for attendance to workshops and cross-programme meetings in your application.

Assessors are not looking for detailed costs or a line-by-line breakdown of all project resources. Overall, they want you to demonstrate how the resources you anticipate needing for your proposed work:

  • are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
  • represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
  • maximise potential outcomes and impacts

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I)

Trusted Research and Innovation is the protection of the UK’s intellectual property, sensitive research, people, and infrastructure from potential theft, misuse, and exploitation.

Organisations receiving UKRI funding are obliged to act in line with UK government legislation. They are also expected to undertake appropriate due diligence assessments of organisations involved in research partnerships, collaboration agreements, and commercial contracts.

You will be asked about:

  • which areas of the National Security and Investment (NSI) Act your project relates to
  • who you intend to collaborate with and how
  • if your project requires an export control licence

Your answers may affect the T&Cs of your funding agreement if you are successful. We may use your answers to determine that our current T&Cs are sufficient or if additional T&Cs are required.

How we will assess your application

Assessment process

We will assess your application using the following process.

Panel

An assessment panel comprised of independent external members will review your application against the assessment criteria. Panel members will consist of experts spanning the breadth of the funding opportunity remit to ensure that due consideration is given to inter and multi-disciplinary applications.

The programme expert advisory group (EAG) will consider fundable applications to make recommendations for a balanced portfolio of investments under this funding opportunity.

The EAG will formally advise the funders, who will make the final funding decision.

For more information on how we prioritise applications for funding please visit How we make decisions.

Timescale

We aim to complete the assessment process within three months of receiving your application.

Feedback

We will give feedback with the outcome of your application within three months of the funding opportunity closing date.

We reserve the right to work with successful applicants post assessment to discuss any aspect of the application before award (for example, discuss panel feedback or requirements from NERC and co-funders).

Principles of assessment

We support the San Francisco declaration on research assessment and recognise the relationship between research assessment and research integrity.

Find out about the UKRI principles of assessment and decision making.

Using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in expert review

Reviewers and panellists are not permitted to use generative AI tools to develop their assessment, including to correct language, spelling, grammar and formatting. Using these tools can potentially compromise the confidentiality of the ideas that applicants have entrusted to UKRI to safeguard.

For more detail see our policy on the use of generative AI.

Sharing data with co-funders

NERC, as part of UKRI, will need to collect some personal information to manage your UKRI Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications.

We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.

NERC, as part of UKRI, will need to share the application and any personal information that it contains with programme partners so they can participate in the assessment of this funding opportunity:

  • Department for Transport (DfT), Department for Business and Trade (DBT), Aerospace Technology Institute (ATI)
  • the programme expert advisory group (EAG) who will advise the funders on a balanced portfolio of investments from the fundable projects

See more information on how DfT & DBT use personal information:

Assessment areas

The assessment areas we will use are:

  • vision
  • approach
  • applicant and team capability to deliver
  • ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)

Find details of assessment questions and criteria under the ‘Application questions’ heading in the ‘How to apply’ section.

Contact details

Get help with your application

If you have a question and the answers aren’t provided on this page

The helpdesk is committed to helping users of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service as effectively and as quickly as possible. In order to manage cases at peak volume times, the helpdesk will triage and prioritise those queries with an imminent opportunity deadline or a technical issue. Enquiries raised where information is available on the Funding finder opportunity page and should be understood early in the application process (for example, regarding eligibility, content or remit of a funding opportunity) will not constitute a priority case and will be addressed as soon as possible.

Contact details

For help and advice on costings and writing your application please contact your research office in the first instance, allowing sufficient time for your organisation’s submission process.

For questions related to this specific funding opportunity please contact aviation@nerc.ukri.org

Any queries regarding the system or the submission of applications through the Funding Service should be directed to the helpdesk.

Email: support@funding-service.ukri.org
Phone: 01793 547490

Our phone lines are open:

  • Monday to Thursday 8:30am to 5:00pm
  • Friday 8:30am to 4:30pm

To help us process queries more efficiently, we request that users highlight the council and opportunity name in the subject title of their email query, include the application reference number, and refrain from contacting more than one mailbox at a time.

For further information on submitting an application read How applicants use the Funding Service.

Additional info

Background

The government is committed to delivering greener transport and supporting the missions to kickstart economic growth and to make Britain a clean energy superpower. Aviation has both CO2 emissions and non-CO2 climate impacts and recent scientific research shows that the non-CO2 impacts of aviation could be greater than the impact from CO2 emissions. Whilst the impact of CO2 emissions can be quantified, academic research shows that there continues to be significant uncertainty regarding aviation’s non-CO2 impacts and there is a need to improve our understanding, and to identify and develop policy options and measures to mitigate these impacts.

The UK aviation industry is accelerating the development of new ultra-efficient and zero-emission aircraft technologies and low carbon solutions to address the challenge of aviation CO2 emissions. However, both government and industry are mindful that while there continues to be uncertainty regarding the magnitude of aviation’s non-CO2 impacts, it most likely has an overall warming impact which could be greater than CO2 emissions. Therefore, designs for technological solutions for reducing CO2 emissions must also consider incorporating measures to reduce aviation’s non-CO2 impacts as well.

Undertaking further research to increase our understanding of this issue is needed to inform government and industry investment and policy decisions in respect of aircraft technology, manufacturing, fuel production and wider aviation operations.

The Aviation’s non-CO2 Impact on the Climate programme focuses on two aspects:

  • improving our understanding of aviation’s non-CO2 impacts and reducing the current scientific uncertainties (this includes contrail cirrus, nitrous oxides, and other non-CO2 emissions such as water vapour and particulates like soot and sulphur)
  • identifying and developing mitigating actions to address those impacts (this includes, but is not limited to, technology development, sustainable aviation fuel, hydrogen aircraft (both direct combustion and fuel cells), contrail prediction and avoidance, reducing aromatic content of kerosene and carbon pricing)

The programme, while managed as a whole and overseen by a single programme board, is split across two funding lines, one for academic-led fundamental research projects (commissioned by NERC) and one for industry-led applied research projects (commissioned by ATI).

Programme management

The overall funders for the wider programme (NERC, DBT and DfT) form a programme board to oversee the progress of the programme, making funding decisions and have oversight for delivery and strategic direction of the research programme. There is also a programme team made up from representation from programme partners who oversee programme operation.

Programme coordinator

A programme coordinator team is responsible for delivery of cross-programme integration, stakeholder engagement and communication across the wider landscape to maximise the outcomes and impacts of the programme.

Funded projects will work with the programme coordination team to achieve integration and maximise project and programme outcomes.

Expert advisory group

A programme expert advisory group (EAG) has been established comprising of experts from across industry and academia. The EAG will provide critical advice and recommendations to the programme board on the strategic direction of the programme and balance of the portfolio. Active EAG members will not be eligible for funding through programme funding opportunities. The programme coordinator chair’s this group.

Programme integration and reporting requirements

If you are successful, you will be required to report research outcomes in line with standard UKRI terms and conditions for funding. This is required annually and continues for up to five years post grant end.

In addition, if you are successful, you will be expected to attend a cross-programme events and annual programme meetings, the latter to present your ongoing results. Project leads will be required to work with the programme coordinator team and the EAG throughout the lifetime of their project. You should include costs (travel and subsistence) for attendance to workshops and cross-programme meetings in your application.

You may also be required to provide additional information for monitoring and evaluation purposes during the programme lifetime and, according to standard grant terms and conditions, projects may be required to comply with any additional requests, for example, reporting updates to the programme coordinator or via DBT for future programme evaluation activities, including via the ATI Programme.

t the end of your project, project teams will be required to report to the funders and will subsequently be invited to attend an end of programme meeting (date to be confirmed in early 2028).

Research and innovation impact

Impact can be defined as the long-term intended or unintended effect research and innovation has on society, economy and the environment; to individuals, organisations, and the wider global population.

Research disruption due to COVID-19

We recognise that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused major interruptions and disruptions across our communities. We are committed to ensuring that individual applicants and their wider team, including partners and networks, are not penalised for any disruption to their career, such as:

  • breaks and delays
  • disruptive working patterns and conditions
  • the loss of ongoing work
  • role changes that may have been caused by the pandemic

Reviewers and panel members will be advised to consider the unequal impacts that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the capability to deliver and career development of those individuals included in the application. They will be asked to consider the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the research they are proposing.

Where disruptions have occurred, you can highlight this within your application if you wish, but there is no requirement to detail the specific circumstances that caused the disruption.

This is the website for UKRI: our seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help improve our online products and services.