Funding opportunity

Funding opportunity: EPSRC-Defra Reimagining Circularity: full stage

Start application

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) invite you to develop a NetworkPlus which builds new capacity, strengthens community and enhances research to innovation capabilities focused on the circular economy in data and metrics, or textiles. You must imaginatively use the ‘Plus’ element to accelerate impact in your chosen area. You must be at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding.

Teams must implement an inter or transdisciplinary approach, or both, including industrial partners. The full economic cost (FEC) of your project can be up to £5.41 million. We will fund 80% FEC for up to 36 months.

Who can apply

You can only apply for this funding opportunity if we have invited you to do so following a successful outline application.

This opportunity is open to organisations with standard eligibility. Check if your organisation is eligible.

UKRI (UK Research and Innovation) individual eligibility rules apply. For full details, visit UKRI’s eligibility page.

Who is eligible to apply

This is a Defra-only funded programme, delivered by EPSRC. Please note that Defra are following EPSRC eligibility rules.

EPSRC NetworkPlus grants are open to:

  • UK higher education institutions
  • research council institutes
  • UKRI-approved independent research organisations
  • eligible public sector research establishments
  • NHS bodies with research capacity

Any individual can only appear on one application as project lead and only two projects in total. For example, one as project lead and one as co-lead or two as co-lead.

Your application should demonstrate that the team combines different areas of expertise and experience as appropriate to lead a NetworkPlus and achieve the stated outcomes, including community engagement, leadership and driving impact.

To foster innovative interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary research, or both, and cross-disciplinary interactions for researchers involved, we are looking for teams consisting of two or more researchers representing two or more areas of expertise to apply, and to include industrial partners.

We also expect networks to champion and engage with early and mid-career individuals. What we consider as early to mid-career is broad. It can span from those recently appointed to their first permanent academic position to those who hold a modest portfolio of grants and are looking to expand their network.

If early and mid-career individuals will be named in your leadership team on application, please mention this in the ‘Applicant and team capability to deliver’ section of the application form on the UKRI Funding Service. Provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate they fall in these career stages. We will not consider years post-PhD or job title as a marker of career progression. We recognise alternative career paths and value the diversity of career experiences.

We welcome the inclusion of senior professional enabling staff, such as professional research and investment strategy managers, as project co-leads. If you decide to include such roles, we would expect them to be represented as an integral part of the leadership team and so designated as project co-leads in your application.

Applications must be within majority EPSRC remit and must be within the scope of this funding opportunity. We will reject applications deemed to have a majority remit within another UKRI council. We reserve the right to make such remit decisions without reference to expert review.

Who is not eligible to apply

Holders of postdoctoral level fellowships are not eligible to apply for an EPSRC grant.

Individuals based in non-UK countries can be involved in the grant as visiting researchers, project partners, or members of advisory boards. However, they are not eligible to be project leads or co-leads, with the exception of individuals based at Norwegian institutions, who are eligible to be co-leads.

Businesses are not eligible applicant organisations as part of this funding opportunity. However, they are expected to be listed as project partners.

International researchers

Defra is the lead funder for this opportunity, following EPSRC eligibility rules. International researchers can only apply as ‘project co-lead (international)’ as part of an applications making use of the UKRI-RCN Money Follows Cooperation agreement or the UKRI-IIASA agreement.

You should include all other international collaborators (or UK partners not based at approved organisations) as project partners.

Resubmissions

We will not accept uninvited resubmissions of projects that have been submitted to UKRI or any other funder.

Find out more about EPSRC’s resubmissions policy.

Equality, diversity and inclusion

We are committed to achieving equality of opportunity for all funding applicants. We encourage applications from a diverse range of researchers.

We support people to work in a way that suits their personal circumstances. This includes:

  • career breaks
  • support for people with caring responsibilities
  • flexible working
  • alternative working patterns

We would like to encourage you to ensure you consider how you will support capacity building and skills development across and beyond the NetworkPlus activities. We specifically ask you to consider this when putting together your team, and planning your activities and outcomes. This includes fostering a nurturing research culture and ensuring EDI principles are integrated in all parts of the application.

Find out more about equality, diversity and inclusion at EPSRC.

UKRI can offer disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders during the application and assessment process.

What we're looking for

Full applications should closely match the original outline application in terms of the activities proposed and partnerships. In costing the full application, careful consideration should be given to the value for money of the proposed activities. The scope detailed at the outline stage can be found in the Additional Information section.

As noted at the outline application, projects funded through this funding opportunity must be predominantly in EPSRC remit. Full applications not meeting this requirement in the judgement of EPSRC staff will be rejected without recourse to assessment stages.

Demand management

Demand management is being applied to this funding opportunity. Further details are provided in the ‘Additional information’ section

Aim

The industrialised world continues to produce and consume unsustainable levels of resources. Extending the life of existing structures, products, components and materials, as well as prioritising approaches which maximise use, much more effectively reduces environmental impacts and increases the sustainability of the product supply systems.

To deliver a more resilient and regenerative economy, we need to consider new and innovative approaches, as well as revisit or refine current approaches and methodologies (or both) to move towards a sustainable circular economy in a positive way.

This is a funding opportunity funded by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and delivered by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC).

It now aims to fund two NetworkPlus investments to build collaboration and knowledge exchange across research and stakeholder communities within two specific challenge areas, namely data and metrics, and textiles. The Plus aspect of the networks is a strong component of the fund and is explained in more detail within the Flexible fund and Expectations of a NetworkPlus sections.

The NetworkPlus will:

  • create visible, collaborative, innovative and interdisciplinary and/or transdisciplinary UK circular economy communities
  • foster an inclusive research environment that establishes a safe space to test new ways of working where failure is permitted and can be exploited to inform alternative approaches
  • bring focus and drive progress to the challenge areas, identify research challenges, opportunities and priorities
  • improve knowledge exchange
  • facilitate impact and advance circular economy policy
  • support the translation of circularity research via an allocation of the flexible funds
  • support initial testing of early-stage ideas in real world settings (feasibility studies) via demonstrators
  • kick-start new collaborations between sectors, including via seed-corn funding
  • grow the areas of circular economy research for the benefit of the UK
  • provide early-stage support for progressing research outputs towards the next stages in creation of real-world innovation and impact
  • lower barriers for engagement of non-academic stakeholders
  • grow capacity for and dissemination of good practice in circular economy. For example, responsible research innovation, trusted research and innovation, ethics, research culture, and equality, diversity and inclusion

The networks will lead to step changes in circular solutions which maximise value and are currently under-explored, such as retrofit, repurpose, refurbish, repair, and synthesise these solutions together with others such as reuse. We have defined these terms for this funding opportunity. Please see the Additional information section for more information.

NetworkPlus investments will be aligned across a range of UK government circular economy (CE) priority sectors, namely a focused investment on textiles, and second aligning with six key sectors needed to develop circular economy pathways (see scope for more details).

Each Network is expected to imaginatively deliver a ‘Plus’ element comprising of three streams, namely seed-corn funding, demonstrators/feasibility studies, and research to innovation or translational research, delivered through management of a flexible fund. Through the flexible funds associated with the NetworkPlus there should be a focus on gaps in research to innovation or translational research in underexplored topic areas.

We expect the Networks to drive progress, support high quality collaborative research and establish themselves as leaders in these areas. Networks should do this by implementing a collaborative and interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary approach (or both). They must bring together diverse communities spanning academia, industry, policy, and others with expertise in related areas, such as behavioural science, innovation and circular business models, from across the UK. The inclusion of industrial partners is mandatory and a crucial aspect of the network.

Applicants are strongly encouraged to form and establish long-lasting partnerships in local governance/with individuals in policy, and with third sector community groups.

We expect you to embrace good practices of team research and value creation. Specifically, that you value a range of contributions from across the research and innovation community ensuring all necessary disciplines, skills, levels of experience and career pathways are brought together to address specific research opportunities.

Collectively and longer term, this will lead to the development of a circular economy in priority sectors and bring together research and innovation communities.

Within UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), EPSRC has played a significant role in promoting circular economy research, for example the National Interdisciplinary Circular Economy Research (NICER) programme, the recent EPSRC-Defra funding opportunities focused on advanced recycling, and circular economy critical mass programmes.

An opportunity focused on the circular solutions that maximise value and extend life of structures, products, components and materials, will directly deliver against EPSRC priorities and the UK government’s manifesto commitment to drive the transition to a circular economy, and government’s long term environment targets, for example, net zero and eliminating avoidable waste by 2050. This work will support us to deliver whole systems solutions to reduce resource use and pollution and deliver a sustainable low carbon future.

Scope

To date, most research enhancing circularity within our linear system has been focused solely on recycling of materials and products. Despite being a good first step, these measures can be resource-intensive. They risk locking the UK into unsustainable patterns of overproduction, excessive consumption and resource scarcity, causing negative environmental, social, and economic consequences.

The networks and flexible funding opportunities should focus on circular solutions which maximise value and extend life, such as repair and system redesign. It is understood that research can, and is encouraged to reach many areas across the entire value chain from extraction to before the end of life. This will collectively deliver a more resilient and regenerative economy.

Within the networks, we expect proactive engagement with identified stakeholders to promote better understanding of circular economy.

Successful applications should demonstrate pathways for lasting legacy beyond the duration of the award through partnerships and engagement strategies.

Challenge areas

The government is committed to reducing the negative impact of resources, reducing waste, and improving social outcomes by transitioning towards a circular economy. To support the government in achieving this goal, it convened a Circular Economy Taskforce of experts to help map the transition. Government intends to publish a Circular Economy Growth Plan soon. The plan will set out opportunities to support growth in sectors right across the economy, including agri-food, built environment, chemicals and plastics, electrical and electronic equipment, textiles, and transport.

By aligning with priority sectors and adopting high value circularity measures the UK can transition from a linear economy to a circular one that aims to support economic growth, deliver green jobs, promote efficient and productive use of resources, minimise negative environmental impacts and accelerate to net zero.

This funding opportunity now has two challenge areas. One area aligns directly with an identified priority sector (textiles), and one is sector agnostic. This will focus on the cross-cutting challenge of data and metrics.

The network challenge areas have been chosen based on analysis of past and current funding opportunities provided by UKRI and Defra to identify research areas which are underrepresented and warrant further exploration. Your application should have a primary focus on one of the proposed challenge areas. Please identify which challenge area you are applying for in your application.

Textiles

For the purpose of this NetworkPlus funding opportunity, we are defining textiles as encompassing the entire value chain including:

  • clothing
  • fibres
  • furniture, for example (for example, carpets and underlays)
  • household textiles (for example, towels, bedding, pillows, duvets and mattresses)
  • specialised uniform. Those with chemical components for PPE requirements can be included
  • technical textiles, or where it is a significant value contributor to the final product (for example, automotive)

We would like to see example outcomes such as:

  • approaches to product design and designing textiles for circularity (for example, durability and repair) reducing overall environmental impact (combined approach of reducing carbon footprint of materials or products and reduced flow of materials)
  • development of novel advanced manufacturing techniques to produce circular textiles, or refinement of current techniques (method validation studies)
  • evidence or pilots that shift consumer and business behaviour towards circular practices (for example, reuse, leasing models, rental and product-as-a-service)
  • collaboration across the value chain to test enablers of circularity
  • ways to make collection and sorting of textiles more effective to retain value of products through secondary markets and extending lifespan of products
  • system thinking approaches to textiles within a future circular economy

Data and metrics

The data and metrics challenge area should be a cross-sector network advancing the circular economy through coordinated data sharing and the development of robust metrics, indicators, and frameworks to enable, measure, and accelerate progress across any of the six priority sectors (agri-food, built environment, chemicals and plastics, electrical and electronic equipment, textiles, and transport).

The network should coordinate data sharing to advance the development and application of robust data, indicators, and frameworks to enable, measure, and accelerate the circular economy. We are particularly interested in:

  • developing and integrating usable circularity metrics and indicators that quantify environmental, social, technical, and economic performance across spatial and temporal scales, including indicators for behaviour change, business adaptation and growth in circular economy activities
  • pulling together data approaches to generate system-level insights into circular flows
  • tracking progress across the circular solutions which maximise value and extend life
  • establishing standards, protocols and frameworks to support interoperability, material traceability and ethical data governance
  • enabling the business use of circular economy data, including the use of circular economy business models, and strategies for businesses and digital infrastructure to support decision-making and innovation

Projects should aim to generate robust, scalable, and policy-relevant evidence to support circular economy transitions. Interdisciplinary approaches and engagement with real-world data contexts are strongly encouraged.

We encourage you to consider the following with the vision for your proposed NetworkPlus:

  • be adventurous and ambitious with the potential for high impact
  • address real-world challenges with respect to the priority sectors and how that will deliver impact
  • prioritise environmental sustainability throughout the programme and across the life cycle of a circular process, to support sustainable approaches in relevant sectors and a greener UK economy
  • consider the whole system (technological, economic, social, cultural, and environmental) within which the proposed research outputs would sit. See the systems approach section

Projects, including those funded by flexible funding, must demonstrably lie primarily within EPSRC’s remit, that is, over 50% EPSRC remit. However, involvement of researchers from other disciplines, including those from other UKRI councils, and embedding an interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary approach (or both) is welcome and encouraged. Please see the ‘Disciplinary approach’ and ‘What we will fund’ sections for more information.

Before applying you should read the background section for this opportunity. Consider the broader context in which your proposed research outcomes sit, including relevant sectors, supply chains, and circular solutions that maximise value.

Expectations of the NetworkPlus

The NetworkPlus is expected to build and support a community of academic and non-academic stakeholders, support collaboration, networking, horizon-scanning, and identify key research challenges. In the generation of new ideas, it should help the community to navigate government strategies and inform the development of future plans in circular economy.

Workstreams should be co-created appropriately with interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary collaborators, or both. You should also co-create with external stakeholders within spaces beyond academia who can provide further understanding of the contextual factors that influence the systems at appropriate disciplinary interfaces.

The NetworkPlus team should have a plan to evaluate and monitor its work including milestones and key performance indicators. They should also have a plan to develop and report case studies annually via submission of an annual report (see additional grant conditions) as it progresses. We also expect networks to report progress every six months to the Advisory Board and provide information on request to UKRI and Defra.

We expect the network to carry out continuous learning, be agile in activities, develop key performance indicators and adapt according to feedback. Annual reports will be used by UKRI and Defra to highlight outcomes and impact from the network, and will be used in informing our thinking about future research, innovation, and evidence for policy making.

The NetworkPlus must engage widely and be inclusive, including:

  • engaging with and drawing on relevant parts of UKRI’s communities, existing strategic investments, and, where relevant, other investments under the UKRI Building a Greener Future strategic theme, namely seek to act as a network of networks, helping to promote and amplify the impact of existing related work
  • working with research expertise from the UK Circular Economy community and relevant government bodies for insights into ongoing work in their theme
  • undertaking a significant and interactive communications and engagement programme, including conferences, roundtables and showcases, and creative and innovative engagement mechanisms, leading to promoting national dialogue and solutions to maximise value and circularity in your chosen challenge area
  • developing a high-quality evidence base platform, for example, a website, to communicate and disseminate information to the broader circular economy community in multiple sectors
  • engaging, including and championing early and mid-career researchers, and professional research enabling staff for example by inclusion on the management team, intentional mentorship, and/or by provision of opportunities which particularly benefit individuals in these career stages and allow them the opportunity to build their networks

The NetworkPlus must identify and address challenges and opportunities, including:

  • promoting understanding of perspectives, needs of different organisations, and knowledge exchange between academia and government, industry and other stakeholders through placements, secondments, fellowship opportunities or innovative mechanisms
  • identifying research and policy priorities and supporting the academic community to engage with these priorities to deliver research which targets critical circular economy challenges and circular solutions which maximise value, and translating academic research and expertise for a user audience

The NetworkPlus must support UKRI’s research strategy and government strategy, including:

  • making it easier for users to understand and access the breadth of existing and emerging evidence and expertise, to inform policy and support UK leadership in circular economy
  • embedding strategic foresight within the circular solutions which maximise value into its vision and activities
  • collaborating with policymakers and regulators to consider likely futures and threats, envisage multiple scenarios, consider what futures are desirable for the UK, what levers the UK has or could have, and how they could or should be used
  • developing a clear strategic vision and a framework to deliver UK thought leadership in the priority sectors aligned with government objectives and transformative circular economy principles
  • building relationships with research organisations internationally sharing similar objectives, employing best practice approaches in trusted research
  • embedding throughout the programme of work consideration of responsible research and innovation, including environmental sustainability, research culture, career development of all staff involved, trusted research, and equality, diversity, and inclusion

The NetworkPlus must engage with different places in the UK including:

  • incorporating a local, regional, devolved administration and national lens in its activities to identify solutions that promote economic, social and cultural prosperity
  • engaging with a number of specific places in the UK to develop ’case studies’ in how the academic community can work with local business, communities, industry and local government councils

The NetworkPlus must also incorporate open data sharing agreements to allow greater transparency and collaboration. It should also develop and run small funding opportunities to allocate funding relevant to the aims and expectations of the network via a flexible fund. Please see Flexible fund section for more details.

Please note, the above list is not exhaustive.

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) in your NetworkPlus

We aim to support a diverse and inclusive research environment where there are equal opportunities. As such, we are asking for an EDI plan at this full application stage. This plan should be project-specific and focus on activities beyond any institutional activities already in place.

It is vital for the circular economy community to be as diverse and inclusive as possible. This is to generate the flow of innovative and novel ideas, innovations and solutions to problems that are needed to enable new discoveries and solve global issues. Attracting, retaining and developing a diverse range of people in research and innovation can only be achieved by making the system more appealing, inclusive and fair. An inclusive environment enables people to voice their suggestions without fear and to feel valued and welcome, and this in turn enables a diversity of people and ideas to thrive. All of us in the community have a role to play in reshaping the system to create welcoming and equitable structures, where everyone feels supported, respected and valued.

We expect you to:

  • use and advance your current understanding of the societal and economic inclusion challenges within the wider circular economy landscape as people progress their career pathway and navigate the community space
  • identify and address your own local environment and disciplinary challenges and barriers to diversity and inclusion, considering how these may influence participation, access, and outcomes across your NetworkPlus
  • translate this learning into actionable and measurable interventions that embed equitable, diverse, inclusive and accessible practices throughout all aspects of your NetworkPlus. Explain the outcomes you aim to create through these activities

While we do not expect project teams to have specific expertise in EDI, the plans should still demonstrate an understanding of any EDI challenges associated with the NetworkPlus, and the activities it undertakes.

Examples of what could be included in the EDI plan are:

  • creating a welcoming, accessible and inclusive environment across all NetworkPlus activities, with a culture where all can contribute, thrive, and feel valued regardless of personal circumstances
  • actions to promote inclusive participation of marginalised groups in the NetworkPlus activities
  • ensuring a diverse membership of your advisory board and leadership team who champion EDI practices and set an example for other leadership groups
  • prioritising the experience and progression of all involved in the NetworkPlus, ensuring they are well supported with networking, career and professional development opportunities
  • demonstrating a clear understanding of the known career-progression barriers, particularly for underrepresented groups and their implications for organisations  and the circular economy community
  • activities to promote retention of marginalised groups in your challenge area community
  • activities to increase accessibility in your chosen challenge area community
  • EDI advocacy
  • ensuring all events and activities related to the NetworkPlus are inclusive and accessible for everyone, including speakers and attendees
  • budgeting for EDI activities and establishing a small team to deliver if necessary
  • ensuring there is comprehensive wellbeing support encompassing physical, mental, social and emotional health to enable all team members to reach their potential
  • investing in continuous professional development on wellbeing and support
  • ensuring there are effective and robust processes for managing and preventing bullying and harassment
  • offering flexible working arrangements for team members who have specific requirements due to personal circumstances, such as parenting or caring responsibilities, disability or health-related reasons and cultural expectations
  • supporting early and mid-career researchers and your NetworkPlus grant manager(s) with setting achievable career goals and providing continuing professional development opportunities

Please see the Additional information section for resources which may be supportive when writing your EDI plan. Any budget requested for EDI activities should be from within the budget allocated to other activities and not the flexible fund.

What does success look like for this funding opportunity?

A successful NetworkPlus will specifically address EPSRC and Defra strategic aims through:

  • the creation of leadership of diverse and inclusive interdisciplinary and/or transdisciplinary research communities (both new and existing) across academia, industry, and policy
  • fostering new connections between relevant communities and projects, including the involvement and support for early and mid-career researchers
  • embedding the development of early and mid-career individuals within all NetworkPlus activities
  • advocating for and propose good practices which will enable others to take research outcomes forward in their own discipline, such as through toolkits, taxonomies and roadmaps. The purpose of these should be applicable wider than purely research with a tangible relevancy to policy
  • delivering an increase in research projects addressing timely and strategically important challenges in the selected research areas and sectors. The flexible funding should be used for seed-corn funds, demonstrators/feasibility studies, and research to innovation/ translational research to deliver impact and broader benefits to society, the economy, and the environment

User engagement

We encourage you to engage with research users in the conception and implementation of the network to maximise impact where appropriate. These can include:

  • academia
  • industry
  • small to medium sized enterprises (SMEs)
  • third sector
  • end users
  • policymakers and government bodies
  • local councils
  • research institutes
  • other sectors as appropriate
  • the public and community groups

Community building and dissemination of work to wider society through stakeholder engagement is strongly encouraged.

Systems approach

Applicants must place their NetworkPlus in the context of the wider system (technological, economic, social, cultural, and environmental) within which the proposed research outputs would sit. These aspects should inform and influence the direction of the proposed network throughout its lifetime. An embedded and informed systems approach enables consideration of the trade-offs, risks and mitigations associated with different approaches. Upskilling the wider community on systems thinking and expertise should be a considered part of the NetworkPlus proposal.

A whole systems approach enables the development of solutions and innovations that are more impactful, while minimising and mitigating unintended consequences. It is a discovery process combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to understanding and managing technological systems alongside broader economic, environmental, social, political and behavioural considerations, taking into account complex interactions.

A shift to a more circular economy provides an opportunity for the UK to achieve more sustainable and clean economic growth and prosperity. However, implementing it within the current UK system may not always be the most appropriate approach.

You should consider questions such as:

  • how does your proposed NetworkPlus influence or impact other parts of the system you are developing? Consider technical, social, political, and economic systems
  • how could other systems influence or impact your proposed activities and outputs?
  • will the planned outputs of the project fit in the current and future circular economy landscape of the UK?
  • have you engaged with the right stakeholders to understand the existing system and influence realistic changes to support your proposed network to have the desired impact?
  • what further research might be needed to have the desired impact in a current or future system? Your network may not necessarily deliver this further research, but it should look to identify it and consider the implications of it
  • have you considered the wider social, legal, regulatory, economic, and environmental context and demonstrated an understanding of the technological and regulatory landscape in which the project outputs would be used?

For more information on the background of this funding opportunity, go to the Additional information section.

Disciplinary approach

We strongly encourage you to take an inter or transdisciplinary approach. Interdisciplinary research could also be considered transdisciplinary if it involves non-academic stakeholders. Multidisciplinary research is not within the scope of this opportunity. Please see the Additional information section for more details on how we are defining these approaches for this funding opportunity.

Environmental sustainability

UKRI’s environmental sustainability strategy lays out our ambition to actively lead environmental sustainability across our sectors. This includes a vision to ensure that all major investment and funding decisions we make are directly informed by environmental sustainability, recognising environmental benefits as well as potential for environmental harm.

In alignment with this, UKRI is tackling the challenge of environmental sustainability through our ‘building a green future’ strategic theme. This aims to develop whole-systems solutions to improve the health of our environment and deliver net zero, securing prosperity across the whole of the UK.

Environmental sustainability is a broad term but may include consideration of such broad areas as:

  • reducing carbon emissions
  • protecting and enhancing the natural environment and biodiversity
  • waste or pollution elimination
  • resource efficiency and a circular economy
  • appropriate degree of application of tools such as Life Cycle Analysis

EPSRC expects programmes to embed careful consideration of environmental sustainability at all stages of the research and innovation process and throughout the lifetime of the grant.

Projects should ensure that environmental impact and mitigation of the proposed research approaches and operations, as well as the associated outputs and outcomes, are considered. Projects must also seek opportunities to influence others and leave a legacy of environmental sustainability within the broader landscape.

Duration

The duration of this award is a maximum of 36 months.

There will be a fixed start date for successful awards. Projects must start on 1 October 2027. We expect applicants to apply for a realistic grant duration for meeting their objectives.

Funding available

The 100% FEC of your project can be up to £5.41 million.

We will fund 80% of the FEC (up to £4.328 million).

Costs requested may be below those requested at the outline stage if suitable savings can be identified. However, the overall cost requested from us at the full application stage cannot be more than 10% above the value of the outline application. If you plan to make significant changes to the budget or scope of your project compared to the outline stage, please discuss this with us prior to submission.

What we will fund

We will fund:

  • community building and networking activities
  • appropriate administrative support
  • flexible funds for demonstrators/feasibility studies, research to innovation projects or translational research, proof of concept studies, market validation and activities targeting policy, business and the third sector collaboration
  • equipment to facilitate communication, networking and events. We welcome innovative and creative thought on approaches to facilitation

Appropriately skilled individuals may be costed to conduct and analyse horizon scanning activities to meet the aims and objectives of the NetworkPlus.

Eligible costs

Project lead and co-leads’ salaries

These should be requested under the directly allocated cost heading.

The project lead and co-leads can request funds to cover their salary costs for the time spent on setting up and leading the NetworkPlus.

Directly incurred costs

Funding requested under the directly incurred cost heading may include the following.

Travel and subsistence

Travel and subsistence enabling members of the NetworkPlus to meet to exchange ideas and expertise may include:

  • travel within the UK
  • visits by or to experts overseas
  • travel and subsistence costs to support secondments

Where possible collaborators should meet their own travel costs.

Staff, including administrative support

Staff may be costed to carry out the activities of the NetworkPlus, including engagement, and horizon scanning activities to meet the aims and objectives of the NetworkPlus.

A sufficient level of administrative support should be requested to ensure the coordination, management, and smooth running of the NetworkPlus.

You are expected to employ a dedicated grant manager as a core member of the team, with relevant experience and costed at the appropriate grade. It is expected that the career development of professional enabling research staff is also centred in their network activity work portfolios.

Reasonable costs for monitoring and dissemination of the network’s output can also be included.

Network activities to be funded from the network activities fund (40% of total funds applied for)

The information contained in this section refers to the activities the NetworkPlus team can organise to support their NetworkPlus objectives. They cannot be funded from the flexible fund allocation.

Funding can be requested for:

  • activities to identify and disseminate key research challenges in the area, such as horizon-scanning studies
  • activities to generate new research projects in the area, such as sandpits
  • activities to facilitate impact and advance policy, such as reports, websites and briefings
  • secondment support, including scoping of potential opportunities, travel and subsistence, and other appropriate costs
  • activities to support career development, training and EDI
  • activities such as networking events to connect users, industry and other stakeholders with the research base
  • communication costs, for example, for a web server or web presence for the duration of the project
  • equipment to support networking, events and communication
  • expert working groups
  • problem-solving workshops
  • online discussion fora
  • debates
  • lectures and seminars
  • other projects as appropriate for the NetworkPlus, and to allow the NetworkPlus to meet the expectations set out above

You are encouraged to think creatively about the range of activities that could support the delivery of the NetworkPlus goals. Please get in touch if you would like to discuss your proposed activities with us ahead of submission.

Flexible fund allocation (60% of total funds applied for)

The information in this section refers to the flexible fund allocation.

Any flexible funding will be expected to be awarded as part of an open competition to the community. Those involved in the NetworkPlus team cannot apply for or be involved with awards made with flexible funding.

Individuals who are based in the same institution as a member of the NetworkPlus team can apply for the flexible funds.

Prospective applicants to this funding opportunity should ensure:

  • at least 60% of overall funds applied for are allocated to flexible funds
  • at least 50% of the flexible fund should be used for research to innovation or translational research to accelerate a route to market. For example, developing a prototype and testing it with users (such as a durability testing method for textiles)

It is expected that flexible funds will be made available at points during the lifetime of the NetworkPlus. The need for these activities is identified by the NetworkPlus and agreed with UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and Defra. The NetworkPlus team should be prepared to work with UKRI and government stakeholders to identify and pursue these opportunities.

The sum awarded under the heading of ‘flexible funds’ can include both directly incurred and directly allocated expenditure. Please list your flexible fund allocation as directly incurred costs on your application. Post award, please report your flexible funding as directly incurred and directly allocated expenditure as appropriate.

Flexible funding is to fund the following three streams:

  • targeted place-based demonstrators/feasibility studies (academic or addressing government or industry challenges)
  • seed-corn funding (high-risk projects, collaborative projects)
  • research to innovation or translational research

Please ensure it is clear in your application in the Flexible fund section what percentage and funding will be allocated to each of these streams.

Projects funded by the flexible fund should have the following characteristics:

  • accelerate the creation of new maintenance solutions including monitoring and repair, refurbishment, retrofitting, and repurposing technologies. This will support the creation of new UK economic opportunities and position the UK as a global leader in circular economy
  • incorporate development of methods to track products through their life cycles and their effectiveness, such as digital product passports
  • design and deliver disruptive circular business models which can enable a shift from linear practices to more resource efficient circular practices
  • incorporate design for circularity. For example, tools and approaches to designing a product specifically to be circular; a novel material designed specifically to have properties enabling circularity; or the use of an alternative material to enable circularity of a product

Demonstrators for this funding opportunity refers to the research and development stage instead of pilot scale innovation. They are intended to support feasibility studies that test early-stage ideas/research outputs in place-based real-world settings, that is the next stages in the impact pipeline.

The aim is to generate practical insights and evidence that can inform future scaling or investment. Some examples trialling a textile design that encourages repair, or deployment of a new data collection tool at a workplace or other setting.

This flexible fund should be included in the application costings. You should specify the total size of the fund according to the balance of activity that the leadership team propose to undertake directly versus to disseminate via the fund.

Flexible funds can be allocated to researchers at any organisation currently eligible for EPSRC funding.

You will need to have a robust and auditable process in place about how any budget for external distribution will be commissioned, and how you will ensure processes for the allocation of funds are fair and transparent.

Please note that any activities commissioned by the NetworkPlus using the flexible funds will be restricted to EPSRC current research organisation eligibility but will not be bound by standard EPSRC project lead eligibility criterion. It is the project lead’s responsibility to ensure ongoing governance to ensure correct usage and accountability of the funds. These funds must be reported on the final expenditure statement (FES) as awarded on the offer letter and a breakdown of the expenditure must be submitted along with the FES. Projects funded via the flexible fund should also be awarded at 80% FEC to ensure that there is no net cost to the host organisation.

Project partners

Project partners are expected to provide contributions to the delivery of the project and should not therefore be seeking to claim funds from UKRI (this includes businesses). However, where there are specific circumstances where project partners do require funding for minor costs such as travel and subsistence, this will usually be paid at 80% FEC. These costs should be outlined and fully justified in the proposal and will be subject to panel review.

Where the project needs work to be undertaken that is more significant and includes costs other than travel and subsistence, then the project partner may also need to be included as a subcontractor. Any subcontracting costs must be fully justified and will be subject to peer review, as well as the procurement rules of the host organisation. See more information about project partners letter of support.

What we will not fund

Research

Funds cannot be requested to support the NetworkPlus to carry out research-related activities. These should be sought through the normal mechanisms (for example, EPSRC responsive mode funding) or commissioned via open competition using the aforementioned flexible funds.

Area of focus of the NetworkPlus

Please ensure that your NetworkPlus does not:

  • have the majority of the proposed work outside of EPSRC remit. We will reject applications deemed to have a majority remit within another UKRI council. EPSRC reserves the right to make such remit decisions without reference to peer review
  • have a sole focus on recycling as this research area has been the topic of recent UKRI investments. We understand that you may collaborate with individuals who work in this discipline area, however, their expertise must be sought in a secondary/collaborative capacity
  • have a focus which would fit within the remit of the EPSRC Research to Advance UK Recycling Capabilities funding opportunity
  • have a focus on one circular solution that maximises value. Your project should involve a combination of two or more strategies such as refuse, rethink, reduce, reuse, repair, refurbish, remanufacture, or repurpose
  • have a focus that is circularity of plastic packaging, as this topic has been the subject of several recent UKRI investments

Equipment

Equipment over £25,000 is not available through this funding opportunity. We will not be funding laboratory or research equipment for this funding opportunity.

However, equipment to facilitate communication, networking and events can be requested below £25,000.

Additional conditions

The NetworkPlus funding awarded to those successful at the full stage will be subject to the additional conditions below around the following themes. Please note, grant holders may be subject to additional conditions. The full conditions will be outlined in any successful offer letter at full stage.

Community network expectations

In addition to the core research programme, the project will be expected to undertake a wider networking role with the research and user community outside its membership. This may involve coordination of activities such as meetings, workshops or seminars on behalf of EPSRC. A dedicated website must be set up within six months of the start of the grant and regularly maintained to provide a resource for engagement with the wider community.

User engagement strategy

You must develop and execute a strategy for engaging with potential users of the research funded in the project. This strategy should be reviewed and updated regularly as part of the formal management and reporting process agreed for this grant.

Equality, diversity and inclusion

You are expected to prepare a full equality, diversity and inclusion plan for the duration of this grant to demonstrate best practice in equality, diversity and inclusion throughout the lifetime of this funding award. This must be recorded through the grant reporting process.

Project officer appointment

We will nominate a member of EPSRC staff (project officer) who will be your primary point of contact. The project officer will ensure that the project is being run in accordance with the terms and conditions and in line with financial due diligence. The project officer should have access to all documentation of governance and reporting bodies, in so far as it relates to the administration and application of the grant. As funding administrators, all UKRI staff have agreed to maintain the confidentiality required by all parties involved in EPSRC-funded research.

Advisory board membership and operations

This grant must establish and run an independent advisory board, or equivalent body, to oversee the running of the project and provide advice on the strategic direction and activities of the project. The terms of reference and membership of this group (at least 50% independent membership and an independent chair) should be agreed with EPSRC. The EPSRC project officer will also be expected to attend and participate in advisory board and other appropriate meetings for the duration of the grant.

We will nominate a member of Defra staff to be involved in your advisory board. They should have access to all documentation of governance and reporting bodies, in so far as it relates to the administration and application of the grant. Defra staff have agreed to maintain the confidentiality required by all parties involved in EPSRC-funded research.

It is expected the first advisory board meeting will be held within four months of the start date of the project and there will be two meetings a year with contact outside of the meeting when appropriate.

Flexible funds

The sum awarded under the heading of ‘flexible funds’ can include both directly incurred and directly allocated expenditure. These funds must be reported on the final expenditure statement (FES) as awarded on the offer letter and a breakdown of the expenditure must be submitted along with the FES.  If a breakdown of this expenditure is not received the FES will be returned. Standard grant conditions apply to all other funds awarded on this grant. An audit trail of the approval is required for Funding Assurance and the National Audit Office.

Publicity and branding

You must make reference to EPSRC, UKRI, and Defra funding and include the UKRI and Defra logos and relevant branding on all online or printed materials (including press releases, posters, exhibition materials and other publications) related to activities funded a successful grant.

Progress reports

You are responsible for providing annual progress reports against non-financial performance metrics. A detailed list of performance metrics and instructions for reporting will be agreed with the grant holder and advisory board upon commencement of a successful grant.

Management structure

You should have established an appropriate management structure with clear lines of responsibility and authority to oversee the day-to-day running of the project. This should be in place within six months of the start date of the grant. The terms of reference and management structure, including the director, co-director and any other senior staff involved must be approved by EPSRC and Defra in advance. As must any changes to this structure. The project officer will be EPSRC’s main contact with the project and must receive all meeting minutes of the management committees. EPSRC and Defra reserve the right to attend any meetings.

Management resourcing

Adequate resourcing to support an appropriate management structure, as specified in the funding opportunity documentation, should be costed within the grant. This includes employing a grant manager on the grant.

Supporting skills and talent

We encourage you to follow the principles of the Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers, the Technician Commitment and recommendations outlined within the UKRI Action Plan People and Teams.

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I)

UKRI is committed in ensuring that effective international collaboration in research and innovation takes place with integrity and within strong ethical frameworks. Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I) is a UKRI work programme designed to help protect all those working in our thriving and collaborative international sector by enabling partnerships to be as open as possible, and as secure as necessary. Our TR&I Principles set out UKRI’s expectations of organisations funded by UKRI in relation to due diligence for international collaboration.

As such, applicants for UKRI funding may be asked to demonstrate how their proposed projects will comply with our approach and expectation towards TR&I, identifying potential risks and the relevant controls you will put in place to help proportionately reduce these risks.

See further guidance and information about TR&I, including where applicants can find additional support.

How to apply

We are running this funding opportunity on the new UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service so please ensure that your organisation is registered. You cannot apply on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system.

The project lead is responsible for completing the application process on the Funding Service, but we expect all team members and project partners to contribute to the application.

Only the lead research organisation can submit an application to UKRI.

To apply

Select ‘Start application’ near the beginning of this Funding finder page.

  1. Confirm you are the project lead.
  2. Sign in or create a Funding Service account. To create an account, select your organisation, verify your email address, and set a password.
  3. Answer questions directly in the text boxes. You can save your answers and come back to complete them or work offline and return to copy and paste your answers. If we need you to upload a document, follow the upload instructions in the Funding Service. All questions and assessment criteria are listed in the How to apply section on this Funding finder page.
  4. Allow enough time to check your application in ‘read-only’ view before sending to your research office.
  5. Send the completed application to your research office for checking. They will return it to you if it needs editing.
  6. Your research office will submit the completed and checked application to UKRI.

Please be aware that research office and finance teams undertake checks on hosting arrangements and financial eligibility. The ultimate responsibility for ensuring compliance with all opportunity requirements lies with the applicant.

Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant.

When including images, you must:

  • provide a descriptive caption or legend for each image immediately underneath it in the text box (this must be outside the image and counts towards your word limit)
  • insert each new image onto a new line
  • use files smaller than 5MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format

Images should only be used to convey important visual information that cannot easily be put into words. The following are not permitted, and your application will be rejected if you include:

  • sentences or paragraphs of text
  • tables
  • excessive quantities of images

A few words are permitted where the image would lack clarity without the contextual words, such as a diagram, where text labels are required for an axis or graph column.

For more guidance on the Funding Service, see:

References

References should be included within the word count of the appropriate question section. You should use your discretion when including references and prioritise those most pertinent to the application.

Hyperlinks can be used in reference information. When including references, you should consider how your references will be viewed and used by the assessors, ensuring that:

  • references are easily identifiable by the assessors
  • references are formatted as appropriate to your research
  • persistent identifiers are used where possible

General use of hyperlinks

Applications should be self-contained. You should only use hyperlinks to link directly to reference information. You must not include links to web resources to extend your application. Assessors are not required to access links to conduct assessment or recommend a funding decision.

Generative artificial intelligence (AI)

Use of generative AI tools to prepare funding applications is permitted, however, caution should be applied.

For more information see our policy on the use of generative AI in application and assessment.

Deadline

EPSRC must receive your application by 3 November 2026 at 4:00pm UK time.

You will not be able to apply after this time.

Make sure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines.

Following the submission of your application to this funding opportunity, your application cannot be changed, and submitted applications will not be amended. If your application does not follow the guidance, it may be rejected.

If an application is withdrawn prior to peer review or office rejected due to substantive errors in the application, it cannot be resubmitted to the opportunity.

Personal data

Processing personal data

EPSRC as part of UKRI, will need to collect some personal information to manage your Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications.

We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.

EPSRC, as part of UKRI, will need to collect some personal information to manage your Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications.

We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.

EPSRC, as part of UKRI, will need to share the application and any personal information that it contains with Defra and other government departments. See more information on how Defra uses personal information.

Sensitive information

If you or a core team member need to tell us something you wish to remain confidential, email TFSchangeEPSRC@epsrc.ukri.org

Include in the subject line: [the funding opportunity title; sensitive information; your Funding Service application number].

Typical examples of confidential information include:

  • individual is unavailable until a certain date (for example due to parental leave)
  • declaration of interest
  • additional information about eligibility to apply that would not be appropriately shared in the ‘Applicant and team capability’ section
  • conflict of interest for UKRI to consider in reviewer or panel participant selection
  • the application is an invited resubmission

For information about how UKRI handles personal data, read UKRI’s privacy notice.

Institutional matched funding

There is no requirement for matched funding from the institutions hosting the project lead, project co-leads or other staff employed on the application, beyond the standard 20% FEC. Expert reviewers and panels assessing UKRI funding applications must not consider levels of institutional matched funding as a factor on which to base recommendations. Direct and in-kind contributions from third party project partners are encouraged.

This policy does not remove the need for support from host organisations who must provide the necessary research environment and infrastructure for award-specific activities funded by UKRI. For example, research facilities, training and development of staff.

Publication of outcomes

EPSRC, as part of UKRI, will publish the outcomes of this funding opportunity at EPSRC Funding Applications Outcomes.

If your application is successful, we will publish some personal information on the UKRI Gateway to Research.

Summary

Word limit: 550

In plain English, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application.

We usually make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, therefore do not include any confidential or sensitive information. Make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example:

  • opinion-formers
  • policymakers
  • the public
  • the wider research community

Guidance for writing a summary

Clearly describe your proposed work in terms of:

  • context
  • the challenge the project addresses
  • aims and objectives
  • potential applications and benefits

Core team

List the key members of your team and assign them roles from the following:

  • project lead (PL)
  • project co-lead (UK) (PcL)
  • project co-lead (international) (PcL (I))
  • specialist
  • grant manager
  • professional enabling staff
  • research and innovation associate
  • technician
  • visiting researcher
  • researcher co-lead (RcL)

Only list one individual as project lead.

UKRI has introduced a new addition to the ‘Specialist’ role type. Public contributors such as people with lived experience can now be added to an application.

Find out more about UKRI’s core team roles in funding applications.

Application questions

Vision and Approach

Create a document that includes your responses to all criteria. The document should not be more than six sides of A4, single spaced in paper in 11-point Arial (or equivalent sans serif font) with margins of at least 2cm. You may include images, graphs, tables. References may be included but should not exceed one page of your document.

For the file name, use the unique Funding Service number the system gives you when you create an application, followed by the words ‘Vision and Approach’.

Save this document as a single PDF file, no bigger than 8MB. Unless specifically requested, do not include any sensitive data within the attachment.

If the attachment does not meet these requirements, the application will be rejected.

The Funding Service will provide document upload details when you apply.

What are you hoping to achieve with and how will you deliver your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

For the Vision, explain how your proposed work:

  • aligns strategically to the funding opportunity aims and scope
  • aligns with Defra, EPSRC and UKRI priorities
  • demonstrates a coherent strategic vision and establishes clear outcomes for the NetworkPlus
  • is of excellent quality and importance within or beyond the field(s) or area(s)
  • has the potential to advance current understanding, generates new knowledge, thinking or discovery within or beyond the field or area
  • is timely given current trends, context and needs
  • impacts world-leading research, society, the economy or the environment
  • will embed equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) considerations into the programme, and outline how these will guide your aims, as well as other activities such as stakeholder engagement, events and networking

Within the Vision section we also expect you to:

  • identify key communities and future network members
  • describe the concept, context and coordination function of your network
  • demonstrate how the disciplinary approach you plan to embed (interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary, or both) will advance current understanding and generate new knowledge, thinking and concepts
  • how the project will accelerate UK capability in your chosen circular solutions that maximise value
  • how the proposal will deliver towards other UK national priorities and strategic needs (for example,  relevant sectors within the UK’s Modern Industrial Strategy 2025)
  • how the proposal will contribute to growth and resilience in Industrial Strategy sectors and build capability
  • how the proposal is driven by real world research challenges and will deliver more energy-efficient, scalable, and economic viable technologies and approaches
  • how the proposed outputs will deliver the intended impacts in the current or future circular economy landscape of the UK

For the Approach, explain how you have designed your work so that it:

  • is effective and appropriate to achieve your objectives
  • is feasible, and comprehensively identifies any risks to delivery and how they will be managed
  • if applicable, uses a clearly written and transparent methodology
  • if applicable, summarises the previous work and describes how this will be built upon and progressed
  • will maximise translation of outputs into outcomes and impacts
  • describes how your, and if applicable your team’s, research environment (in terms of the place and relevance to the project) will contribute to the success of the work
  • explain how you will undertake community and stakeholder engagement and wider participation
  • will build EDI considerations into the formation, operation and governance of the NetworkPlus, including how these will be operationalised
  • outlines future plans for sustaining the partnership beyond this application, or for funding research which may develop from the partnership

Within the Approach section we also expect you to:

  • explain how you will identify key opportunities/routes for future research, innovation and growth in the relevant sectors, support knowledge transfer and accelerate impacts (economic, social and environmental)
  • outline how you will ensure integration of the disciplines required for the successful co-delivery of the network, for example: new approaches, new methods or new ways of working
  • outline how the reciprocal benefits will be realised for all the disciplines involved
  • outline how stakeholders will be involved in co-creation throughout the life of the network, including how links will be built between government and policy stakeholders and academic communities, supporting two-way communication and collaboration
  • outline how you will engage with key investments in the broader funding landscape
  • outline plans for how management of all relevant work packages will be undertaken, including plans for a dedicated grant manager with appropriate expertise as a core member of the team

References may be included within this section.

Governance

Word limit: 500

How will you manage the award to successfully deliver its objectives?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how the proposed award will be managed, demonstrating that it:

  • will be effectively governed, including details about advisory structures
  • will be effectively and inclusively managed, demonstrated by a clear management plan
  • has clear leadership team roles and responsibilities
  • will manage and encourage partnerships with non-HEI organisations across government, industry and civil society
  • has plans for monitoring your progress as well as self-evaluation throughout the lifetime of your award.
  • will put in place appropriate governance and administration to deliver the range of devolved funding opportunities

We also expect you to outline plans for:

  • ensuring clear and credible targets and success measures, including key performance indicators (KPIs)

Within this section you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form, such as images, if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Applicant and team capability to deliver

Word limit: 1,650

Why are you the right individual or team to successfully deliver the proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Evidence of how you, and if relevant your team, have:

  • the relevant experience (appropriate to career stage) to deliver the proposed work
  • the right balance of skills and expertise to cover the proposed work
  • the appropriate leadership and management skills to deliver the work and your approach to develop others
  • contributed to developing a positive research environment and wider community
  • planned to identify and embed additional expertise where gaps in the team exist

We also expect you to outline clear plans for:

  • ensuring the career development of all involved in your team, including early and mid-career individuals, your grant manager, and any other professional research enabling staff involved.

The word limit for this section is 1,650 words, 1,150 words to be used for Resume for Research and Innovation (R4RI) modules and, if necessary, a further 500 words for Additions.

Use the R4RI format to showcase the range of relevant skills you, and if relevant your team (project and project co-leads, researchers, technicians, specialists, partners and so on) have and how this will help to deliver the proposed work. You can include individuals’ specific achievements but only choose past contributions that best evidence their ability to deliver this work.

Complete this section using the R4RI module headings listed below. Use each heading once and include a response for the whole team, see the UKRI guidance on R4RI. You should consider how to balance your answer, and emphasise where appropriate the key skills each team member brings:

  • contributions to the generation of new ideas, tools, methodologies, or knowledge
  • the development of others and maintenance of effective working relationships
  • contributions to the wider research and innovation community
  • contributions to broader research or innovation users and audiences and towards wider societal benefit

Additions: Provide any further details relevant to your application. This section is optional and can be up to 500 words. You should not use it to describe additional skills, experiences or outputs, but you can use it to describe any factors that provide context for the rest of your R4RI (for example, details of career breaks if you wish to disclose them).

You should complete this section as a narrative. Do not format it like a CV.

The roles in funding applications policy has descriptions of the different project roles.

Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)

What are the ethical and RRI considerations, implications and issues relating to the proposed work? If you do not think that the proposed work raises any ethical or RRI issues, explain why.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Demonstrate that you have identified and evaluated:

  • the relevant ethical and RRI considerations, including both the research or topic area itself and the design and delivery of the project
  • the wider implications of the proposed work, and how you will maximise the positive societal, environmental, and economic benefits arising from the project, whilst minimising unintended negative impacts, such as research misuse or accidental harm
  • how you will manage these considerations throughout the lifecycle of the project

If you are collecting or using data you should identify:

  • any legal and ethical considerations of collecting, releasing and storing the data (including consent, confidentiality, anonymisation, security and other ethical considerations and, in particular, strategies to not preclude further re-use of data)
  • formal information standards that your proposed work will comply with

Additional sub-questions (to be answered only if appropriate) relating to research involving:

  • animals
  • human participants
  • genetically modified organisms

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Please refer to the UKRI position statement on funding ethical research and Responsible innovation for more information around our expectations on ethical and responsible research and innovation.

Animal involvement and ‘3Rs’ ​

You must complete this section about how your proposed project will involve or impact animals. ​

If your project does not involve or impact animals, you must confirm this on the next page. ​

You may be asked about: ​

  • what animals you are involving ​
  • the severity of the procedures you are using ​
  • where the procedures will take place ​
  • welfare standards you aim to meet ​
  • the relevance of your project to the development, validation or dissemination of the 3Rs ​

You may also need to download, complete, and upload at least one set of additional questions. You will be told how to do this towards the end of this section.  ​

To complete this section and check whether your project is in the scope of the questions, refer to the UKRI policy for research and innovation involving animals.

What counts as an animal ​

UKRI policy relates to all animals in the kingdom Animalia, including vertebrates and invertebrates.

Genetically modified organisms and biological risk​

You must complete this section if your project will include genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies. ​

If you project does not involve genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies, you must confirm this on the next page.  ​

You may be asked about: ​

  • the type of organism your project will involve and the procedures your project will include ​
  • the intended use of the organism or genetic technology ​
  • the genetic, biological and environmental risks of your project ​

For more information, see UKRI’s guidance on genetic technologies. ​

Human participation in health-related research ​

You must complete this section about whether your project will include human participation.​

If your project does not involve human participation, you must confirm this on the next page.​

You may be asked about: ​

  • what type of human participation your project includes ​
  • the project design for human participation ​
  • the phase of the clinical trial ​
  • whether the project will be in an NHS setting, and if so, how the project will be registered ​
  • whether diversity and inclusion will be considered ​

For more information, see UKRI’s guidance for human participants in research.

Resources and cost justification

Word limit: 1,000

What will you need to deliver your proposed work and how much will it cost?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Justify the application’s more costly resources, in particular:

  • project staff
  • significant travel for field work or collaboration (but not regular travel between collaborating organisations or to conferences)
  • any equipment that will cost more than £25,000
  • any consumables beyond typical requirements, or that are required in exceptional quantities
  • all facilities and infrastructure costs
  • all resources that have been costed as ‘Exceptions’
  • International collaboration costs

You can request costs associated with reasonable adjustments where they increase as a direct result of working on the project. For further information see Disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders. Where a funding limit is imposed on the opportunity, requested costs for reasonable adjustments may exceed the maximum funding amount.

Assessors are not looking for detailed costs or a line-by-line breakdown of all project resources. Overall, they want you to demonstrate how the resources you anticipate needing for your proposed work:

  • are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
  • represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
  • maximise potential outcomes and impacts

Flexible fund

Word limit: 2,000

How will you use and manage the flexible fund?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how you will use and manage the flexible fund so that it:

  • supports your objectives
  • distributes funding appropriately across a diverse range of activities
  • where appropriate, distributes funding through robust, transparent competitive processes
  • builds capacity in key fields and career stages
  • ensures appropriate processes for monitoring, reporting and governance of funded activities

We also expect you to include the percentage and funding cost per funding stream in your response to this application question. The term stream refers to the three streams mentioned in the funding opportunity (seed-corn funding, demonstrators/feasibility studies, and research to innovation or translational research).

Challenge area alignment

Word limit: 5

What challenge area does your application align to?

Please list whether this is textiles or data and metrics.

EDI Plan

What are the approaches and activities planned to inspire, enable and facilitate EDI in your NetworkPlus?

Word limit: 1,000

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Your EDI plan must be specific to your NetworkPlus and focus on activities beyond any institutional activities already in place.

You are encouraged to consider the following. Please note, not all questions need to be addressed, these are prompts for your consideration:

  • what are the key EDI challenges in your project, also taking into account specific challenges within the community or communities in your chosen challenge area?
  • you should provide evidence of ways in which EDI issues will be managed/addressed/tackled both within your group, institutions and in the wider community level.
  • how will EDI outcomes be measured?
  • what steps will you take to raise awareness of and mitigate against the impact of bias in your group and the wider community in terms of gender, ethnicity, disability or any other protected characteristic through processes, behaviours and culture?
  • how will good practice be sought-out to evolve the EDI plan or approach over the NetworkPlus lifetime? How will this good practice be captured and shared with the wider community?

These plans should be feasible and have appropriate resources allocated to address the challenges.

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

References may be included within this section.

Added value

Word limit: 500

What is the added value that this network will enable that would not be possible otherwise?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Demonstrate how the NetworkPlus will achieve the following:

  • create new interdisciplinary research communities and topics
  • provide a critical mass of researchers with a range of expertise and experience
  • promote mobility between academia, industry and other sectors
  • achieve sustainability of impacts beyond the funding requested

Co-creation and systems approach

Word limit: 500

How have you co-created and designed your NetworkPlus to maximise impact? How have you embedded a systems approach?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

For the co-creation, explain how your proposed work:

  • has been co-created, and will be co-delivered, in partnership and engagement with relevant stakeholders, including industry, policy and the third sector to identify timely and strategically important research and community building challenges, opportunities and solutions
  • demonstrates synergistic connectivity between partners, disciplines, and workstreams

For the systems approach, explain how your proposed work is designed to:

  • embed a systems approach at all stages of the NetworkPlus lifecycle
  • consider the wider context in which the proposed work and outcomes will sit, and the trade-offs and unintended consequences of the outcomes
  • optimise outcomes for UK prosperity, society and environment sustainability, both in research outcomes and in programme operations

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service. References may be included within this section.

Environmental sustainability

Word count: 500

How will you embed environmental sustainability into your project?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how your proposed work will:

  • ensure that environmental impact and mitigation is explicitly considered at all stages of the research lifecycle
  • centre and embed environmental sustainability throughout the aims, objectives, and research outcomes, considering the context specific to the NetworkPlus
  • take a whole systems approach to enable consideration of the trade-offs, risks and mitigations associated with different approaches
  • identify major challenges relating to environmental sustainability in the chosen challenge area and integrate these as part of the NetworkPlus

Environmental sustainability may include consideration of such broad areas as:

  • reducing carbon emissions
  • protecting and enhancing the natural environment and biodiversity
  • waste or pollution elimination
  • resource efficiency and circular economy

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

References may be included within this section.

Place

Word limit: 750

What are the place related challenges or opportunities for your application?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Explain how your proposed work:

  • will deliver local and or regional impacts, both direct and indirect, and who the beneficiaries might be
  • enhances the UK’s research and innovation capabilities through local and or regional activity
  • will engage local and or regional stakeholders in meaningful partnership

Within this section we also expect you to:

  • show understanding of the strengths, needs, opportunities and challenges in the targeted places
  • make good use of local and or regional strengths and assets in the targeted places, including UKRI assets
  • demonstrate how this project will align with local and or regional strategies and or activities
  • demonstrate how the project will encourage project partner contributions either cash or in kind

Project partners

Add details about any project partners’ contributions. If there are no project partners, you can indicate this on the Funding Service.

A project partner is a collaborating organisation who will have an integral role in the proposed research. This may include direct contributions for example cash, donated equipment and resources, or staff seconded to the project, or indirect and in-kind contributions for example use of project partner’s equipment, datasets, or facilities. Project partners may be in industry, academia, third sector or government organisations in the UK or overseas, including partners based in the EU.

Please note, for this funding opportunity it is mandatory to include project partners from industry.

Add the following project partner details:

  • the organisation name and address (searchable via a drop-down list or enter the organisation’s details manually, as applicable)
  • the project partner contact name and email address
  • the type of contribution (direct or in-direct) and its monetary value

If a detail is entered incorrectly and you have saved the entry, remove the specific project partner record and re-add it with the correct information.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

Project partners: letters (or emails) of support

Upload a single PDF containing the letters or emails of support from each partner you named in the Project Partner section. These should be uploaded in English or Welsh only.

What the assessors are looking for in your response

Enter the words ‘attachment supplied’ in the text box. Each letter or email you provide should:

  • confirm the partner’s commitment to the project
  • clearly explain the value, relevance, and possible benefits of the work to them
  • describe any additional value that they bring to the project
  • have a page limit of two sides A4 per partner

The Funding Service will provide document upload details when you apply.

Ensure you have prior agreement from project partners so that, if you are offered funding, they will support your project as indicated in the project partners’ section.

For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.

Facilities

Word limit: 250

Does your proposed research require the support and use of a facility?

What the assessors are looking for in your response

If you will need to use a facility, follow your proposed facility’s normal access request procedures. Ensure you have prior agreement so that if you are offered funding, they will support the use of their facility on your project.

For each requested facility you will need to provide the:

  • name of facility, copied and pasted from the facility information list (DOCX, 42KB)
  • proposed usage or costs, or costs per unit where indicated on the facility information list
  • confirmation you have their agreement where required

Facilities should only be named if they are on the facility information list above. If you will not need to use a facility, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.

Trusted Research and Innovation

Trusted Research and Innovation is the protection of the UK’s intellectual property, sensitive research, people, and infrastructure from potential theft, misuse, and exploitation. ​

Organisations receiving UKRI funding are obliged to act in line with UK government legislation. They are also expected to undertake appropriate due diligence assessments of organisations involved in research partnerships, collaboration agreements, and commercial contracts. ​

You will be asked about: ​

  • which areas of the National Security and Investment (NSI) Act your project relates to ​
  • who you intend to collaborate with and how ​
  • if your project requires an export control licence ​

Your answers may affect the T&Cs of your funding agreement if you are successful. We may use your answers to determine that our current T&Cs are sufficient or if additional T&Cs are required.

How we will assess your application

Assessment process

This funding opportunity follows a two-stage application process:

  • stage one: outline application
  • stage two: full application

Stage one has been completed. This opportunity is stage two.  We will assess your full application using the following process.

Application changes allowed

The details of successful applicants at stage one will be published to facilitate engagement with potential additional partners. Your teams might choose to combine or add partners or find new partners. This could be based on outline stage panel feedback. It will be at your discretion whether to include additional partners in your application.

Remit and sifting process

EPSRC will check all full applications to ensure that they are majority EPSRC remit, are consistent with what was submitted in the outline application and still fit the remit of funding opportunity overall. We reserve the right to reject applications that do not fulfil these requirements.

Panel and interview

For shortlisted applications an interview assessment panel will conduct interviews with applicants after which the panel will make a funding recommendation.

The panel will consist of members with expertise in circular economy, policy, the operations and delivery of large investments, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary working.

Before the interviews, the panel will be invited to provide comments against the assessment criteria. The project lead on the application will be invited to submit a response to these comments. For the applicant response stage, you will have 14 days to respond to reviewers’ comments.

Following the project lead response, the panel will then conduct interviews with project teams.

Up to four applicants per project team will be permitted to attend the interview. We will invite you to make a presentation, presented in the applicant’s preferred format, to the panel and answer the panel’s questions as part of the assessment process.

After the interviews are complete, the panel will score then rank the applications against the full assessment criteria, using the information contained in the applications. The expert panel will use the evidence provided by the applicants, their comments, the applicant response, and interviews to assess the application against the assessment criteria and rank it alongside other applications after which the panel will make a funding recommendation.

For more information on how we prioritise applications for funding please visit How we make decisions.

Interviews will be held virtually in the week commencing 25 January 2027. We expect to interview all invited applicants, subject to checks. Applicants will be contacted within four weeks of the opening date to schedule a time for their interview.

The panel will make a funding recommendation, and the final decision will sit with EPSRC and Defra.

Timescale

We aim to complete the assessment process within four months of receiving your application.

Feedback

For full applications considered by the interview panel, we will give feedback with the outcome of your application.

Principles of assessment

We support the San Francisco declaration on research assessment and recognise the relationship between research assessment and research integrity.

Find out about the UKRI principles of assessment and decision making.

Using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in expert review

Generative AI may be used only for the purpose of language refinement during application assessment. When using generative AI to refine the language of a review, expert reviewers and panellists must ensure that:

  • no part of the application being assessed is entered into a generative AI tool
  • no personal information from the application is disclosed
  • generative AI is not tasked with understanding, summarising or evaluating the application’s content

Expert reviewers and panellists must also:

  • comply with relevant intellectual property and data protection legislation
  • not take into account or speculate within their assessment whether generative AI has been used to develop the application

For more detail see our policy on the use of generative AI.

Sharing data with co-funders

We will need to share the application (including any personal information that it contains) with Defra and other government departments.

See more information on how Defra uses personal information.

We reserve the right to modify the assessment process as needed.

Involvement of co-funders in the assessment process

Defra will be involved in the assessment process in several ways.

Defra will recommend panel members and will have an observer at the panel to advise on their interests and scope but will not be present as a panel member influencing the rank order. Defra will also be consulted to approve any shortlisting decisions at the remit checking stage. These decisions will be made jointly by EPSRC and Defra in partnership.

Funding decisions: a portfolio approach

Subject to a satisfactory quality threshold being met, decisions may be made using a portfolio approach to ensure an appropriate geographic coverage across the UK. We will seek as much as is practical to avoid excessive clustering of investments in any one geographic area.

To enable panel to do this, the portfolio distribution will be considered at both stages in the assessment process (meaning, shortlisting at outline and full stages).

Assessment areas

The assessment areas we will use are:

  • vision and approach
  • governance and advisory structures
  • applicant and team capability to deliver
  • ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)
  • resources and cost justification
  • flexible fund
  • EDI Plan
  • added value of the NetworkPlus
  • co-creation and systems approach
  • environmental sustainability
  • place

At full stage we will also ask you to describe clear and credible targets and success measures, including key performance indicators (KPIs) within the governance and advisory structures assessment criterion.

Find details of assessment questions and criteria under the ‘Application questions’ heading in the ‘How to apply’ section.

Contact details

Get help with your application

If you have a question and the answers aren’t provided on this page

The helpdesk is committed to helping users of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service as effectively and as quickly as possible. In order to manage cases at peak volume times, the helpdesk will triage and prioritise those queries with an imminent opportunity deadline or a technical issue. Enquiries raised where information is available on the Funding finder opportunity page and should be understood early in the application process (for example, regarding eligibility, content or remit of a funding opportunity) will not constitute a priority case and will be addressed as soon as possible.

Contact details

For help and advice on costings and writing your proposal please contact your research office in the first instance, allowing sufficient time for your organisation’s submission process.

For questions related to this specific funding opportunity please contact sustainablemanufacturing@epsrc.ukri.org including EPSRC-Defra Reimagining Circularity in the subject header.

Any queries regarding the system or the submission of applications through the Funding Service should be directed to the helpdesk.

Email: support@funding-service.ukri.org

Phone: 01793 547490

Our phone lines are open:

  • Monday to Thursday 8:30am to 5:00pm
  • Friday 8:30am to 4:30pm

To help us process queries quicker, we request that users highlight the council and opportunity name in the subject title of their email query, include the application reference number, and refrain from contacting more than one mailbox at a time.

For further information on submitting an application read How applicants use the Funding Service.

Additional info

Demand management

Any individual can only appear on one application as project lead and only two projects in total. For example, one as project lead and one as co-lead or two as co-lead.

Background

Within UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) has played a significant role in promoting recycling research, for example the National Interdisciplinary Circular Economy Research (NICER) programme. We have previously supported research aligned with UKRI’s strategic theme of Building a Green Future, part of the UKRI strategy 2022 to 2027: transforming tomorrow together.

Relevant UK and devolved nations’ policies include:

Research and innovation impact

Impact can be defined as the long-term intended or unintended effect research and innovation has on society, economy and the environment; to individuals, organisations, and the wider global population.

Webinar for potential applicants

We will hold a webinar on 17 September 2026 at 2pm UK time for invited full stage applicants.

Register for the webinar.

We held a webinar about the outline stage on 13 November 2025. This provided more information about the funding opportunity and a chance to ask questions. It included a presentation from EPSRC and Defra, and a moderated question and answer panel.

Watch the webinar (YouTube).

See the webinar slides (PDF, 4MB).

Read the webinar questions and answers (PDF, 130KB).

Resources to help you formulate your plan when considering equality, diversity and inclusion:

Equality, diversity and inclusion

EPSRC equality, diversity, and inclusion action plan 2022 to 2025

Expectations for equality, diversity and inclusion

Outputs and outcomes of the EPSRC Inclusion Matters portfolio

The workplace for LGBT+ physical scientists: a report by the Institute of Physics, Royal Astronomical Society and the Royal Society of Chemistry

Access Guidelines (University of East Anglia)

Inclusive Meeting Guide v2.3 (Squarespace)

The EDI cube: A tool for project design, evaluation and teaching (CREDS)

Royal Society of Chemistry: Resources for improving science culture

EDI strategy and action plans

EDI Caucus

EDI in PGR Recruitment Guide (University of Nottingham)

UKRI good practice principles in recruitment and training at a doctoral level

The final link about recruitment has been included for you as a reference if you are recruiting any NetworkPlus staff during the lifetime of the award

Circular solution definitions

For the purpose of this funding opportunity, we define solutions within a circular economy using the following definitions, adapted from Kirchherr et al. (2017) and via additional sources listed:

  • refuse: make product redundant by abandoning its function or by offering the same function with a radically different product
  • rethink: make product use more intensive
  • redesign: this can include modular design to make products easier to repair, remanufacture, and upgrade enables the replacement or customisation of components, extending product life and enhancing user value (Ellen MacArthur Foundation). It can also incorporate ecodesign, integrating environmental considerations from the design stage through to manufacturing, this approach also reduces ecological impact and supports sustainable product development (Riesener et al. 2023)
  • retrofit: improving a building to be more energy efficient (Centre for Sustainable Energy)
  • reduce: increase efficiency in product manufacture or use by consuming fewer natural resources and materials. Keeping resource extraction and acquisition of products at minimum
  • reuse: the repeated use of a product or packaging item for its originally intended purpose without significant modification
  • repair: maintenance and return of a defective product to a usable state, so it can be used for with its original function
  • refurbish: restore an old product to good working order. This can include repairing or replacing components, updating specifications, and improving cosmetic appearance (Ellen MacArthur Foundation)
  • remanufacture: re-engineering products and parts or components of products to a like-new state with the same or improved condition as originally manufactured product
  • repurpose: use discarded product or its parts in a new product with a different function
  • (not in scope) recycle: process materials to obtain the same (high grade) or lower (low grade) quality
  • (not in scope) recover: incineration of material with energy recovery

The following are two concepts which complement the circular solutions listed above and can be referred to:

  • servitisation: provision of products as a service and keep products in use as long as possible, moving away from ownership models to increase resource efficiency and improve quality of products. The service or provider are responsible for costs associated with maintenance
  • circular business models: designed to create and capture value by keeping products and materials in use at their highest value

Disciplinary approach

For this funding opportunity, we are using the following definition of interdisciplinary from the REF 2021 Interdisciplinary Advisory Panel final report (PDF, 510KB).

“Interdisciplinary research is understood to achieve outcomes (including new approaches) that could not be achieved within the framework of a single discipline. Interdisciplinary research features significant interaction between two or more disciplines and/or moves beyond established disciplinary foundations in applying or integrating research approaches from other disciplines.”

We have defined the terms multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary as follows.

Multidisciplinary research is where researchers work independently within their disciplines and there is little or no integration of disciplines. Work packages are discrete and discipline specific rather than integrating disciplinary knowledge and can result in distinct outputs. Some disciplines are not included from the start and are not involved in the project framing or the research design. In cases like this there are clear asymmetries of leadership within the project due to the project objectives. In these cases, the project is considered multidisciplinary.

Transdisciplinary research has various definitions but is often defined as research that transgresses boundaries between disciplinary knowledge or integrates different bodies of knowledge and actively co-creates knowledge between academic and societal partners such as policy makers or business.

Flexible fund allocation

60% of the overall award value must be allocated to the flexible fund. More context is provided below to support you for the resources and cost.

£3,246,000 (5.41 x 0.6) is 60% of the maximum 100% FEC. This will be awarded by EPSRC at 80% to the lead research organisation (£2,596,800).

The lead research organisation holding the NetworkPlus award would only need to disseminate £2,596,800. The flexible fund grants should be awarded to the receiving organisation at 80% and the receiving organisation would need to fund the remaining 20%. For example:

  • award holder University Y awards University X a flexible fund grant which has a 100% FEC value of £10,000
  • award holder University Y would award £8,000 (from the £2,596,800 fund) and University X would need to fund the remaining 20% (£2,000)

Research disruption due to COVID-19

We recognise that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused major interruptions and disruptions across our communities. We are committed to ensuring that individual applicants and their wider team, including partners and networks, are not penalised for any disruption to their career, such as:

  • breaks and delays
  • disruptive working patterns and conditions
  • the loss of ongoing work
  • role changes that may have been caused by the pandemic

Reviewers and panel members will be advised to consider the unequal impacts that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the capability to deliver and career development of those individuals included in the application. They will be asked to consider the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the research they are proposing.

Where disruptions have occurred, you can highlight this within your application if you wish, but there is no requirement to detail the specific circumstances that caused the disruption.

This is the website for UKRI: our seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help improve our online products and services.