Summary
Word limit: 550
In plain English, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application.
We usually make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, therefore do not include any confidential or sensitive information. Make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example:
- opinion-formers
- policymakers
- the public
- the wider research community
Guidance for writing a summary
Clearly describe your proposed work in terms of:
- context
- the research the equipment will enable
- aims and objectives
- potential outcomes and benefits
Core team
List the key members of your team and assign them roles from the following:
- project lead (PL)
- project co-lead (UK) (PcL)
- specialist
- professional enabling staff
- research and innovation associate
- technician
- researcher co-lead (RcL)
Only list one individual as project lead.
The core team should only include those individuals involved in the delivery and operation of the requested equipment. Details of users and projects should be provided in the ‘Vision’ section. Any suppliers, manufacturers or industrial partners that have an integral role in the grant should be included in the ‘Project partners’ section and should provide a letter of support.
UKRI has introduced a new addition to the ‘specialist’ role type. Public contributors such as people with lived experience can now be added to an application.
Find out more about UKRI’s core team roles in funding applications.
Research technical professionals
A research technical professional can be listed as a project lead or project co-lead, provided that:
- demonstrate the expertise, skills and capability to deliver the proposed application
- show how they will achieve the proposed outcomes, including appropriate project management, leadership and knowledge
- their appointment is resourced from the central funds of their research organisation at the time of application
- their contract extends beyond the duration of the project, or such a contract would be put in place if the proposal is successful
If you have any questions regarding eligibility, please contact us at bbsrcalert@bbsrc.ukri.org before submitting your application.
Purpose
Word limit: 1,500
What is the equipment, why is it needed, and why should BBSRC support it?
To describe the equipment you are requesting, you must complete the equipment classification table (DOCX 98.7KB) supplied in the ‘Additional information’ section and paste this table into the text box as part of your application.
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Explain how the proposed equipment:
- is timely, given current trends and context
- delivers an unmet need
- meets community demand and need from a diverse and inclusive user base
- enhances and complements existing research capability at a local, regional, or national scale
- meets the strategic aims of BBSRC, UKRI or the government
Please provide a summary of existing facilities beyond the institution, including identification of similar instruments overseas or in industry, outlining reasons why they cannot be utilised for the intended research.
We recommend applicants make use of equipment databases when deciding on what equipment to request, such as the Equipment Data Service operated by Jisc.
Where multi-component equipment is requested, to support your response, please provide a clear diagram or schematic that demonstrates how the equipment will operate as a pipeline or platform.
You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the UKRI Funding Service.
Vision
Word limit: 2,500
What are you hoping to achieve with the proposed equipment?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Explain how the proposed equipment will:
- enable high quality, novel or transformative research with the potential to generate new knowledge, thinking or discovery within or beyond the field or area
- offer training opportunities for the wider community
- have measurable impact beyond the immediate team, including on world-leading research, society, the economy, or the environment
- be of international importance (if applicable)
- enhance the UK’s research and innovation capabilities through local, regional or national activity
Please provide a detailed plan of research which includes a description of the users and projects that will be supported by the equipment, with sufficient experimental detail to allow the panel to assess the quality of the research, including preliminary results where possible.
References may be included within this section.
You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.
Approach
Word limit: 2,000
What are your plans to manage the proposed equipment?
Please provide a Gantt chart, or similar project timeline, outlining the steps required to procure, install, and deploy the equipment, as well as any activities needed to train users and staff. The chart should clearly identify all activities to be undertaken during the award period and does not need to include details of the research that will be performed using the equipment.
What the assessors are looking for in your response
We expect you to show how your approach:
- is feasible, identifying any risks to delivery and citing appropriate mitigation
- provides details of access and usage estimates, particularly where a culture of equipment sharing may extend use to external users
- considers the user perspective and their needs, including how feedback will be sought and subsequently used to inform the management of the resource
- provides long-term technical support which will be available for the requested equipment
- provides training and development of technical staff
- describes how the research environment (in terms of the place, its location, complementary expertise, facilities and relevance to the proposal) will contribute to the successful utilisation of the equipment
References may be included within this section.
You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.
Please also provide a plan for prioritising access to and maximising usage of the infrastructure. This should include any application and assessment processes and an estimate for the balance of users from the host institution, academics from external institutions and industrial users.
Sustainability
Word limit: 1,500
What steps have you taken to ensure the sustainability (economic, environmental and social) of your proposed equipment?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
For the sustainability, explain how the proposed equipment:
- is as economically, environmentally and socially sustainable as possible
- will have its lifetime maximised, including stating what the expected lifetime is and, where relevant, how the asset will be sustainably decommissioned
Within the Sustainability section we also expect you to explain:
- how long-term operational and maintenance costs, including staffing, will be supported
- how the proposed equipment will be integrated into an existing service, facility, equipment pool, or similar
- how the proposed equipment will contribute to UKRI or host institute carbon reduction targets
- if relevant, how the proposed equipment contributes to a broader approach to environmental sustainability, such an enhancing biodiversity or clean air, as well as reducing carbon emissions
- your plans for sustainability and legacy beyond the end of award period. These could include cost recovery models, securing additional funding, development or expansion after the initial period of funding
- how you have considered equality, diversity and inclusion, including equitable access, in the design and planned use of the equipment to maximise benefit to the UK bioscience community
Applicant and team capability to deliver
Word limit: 2,250
Why are you the right individual or team to procure and manage the proposed equipment?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Evidence of how you, and if relevant your team, have:
- the relevant experience (appropriate to career stage)
- the right balance of skills and expertise
- the appropriate leadership and management skills and your approach to develop others
- contributed to developing a positive research environment and wider community
You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.
The word count for this section is 2,250 words: 1,750 words to be used for Résumé for Research and Innovation (R4RI) modules (including references) and, if necessary, a further 500 words for Additions.
Use the R4RI format to showcase the range of relevant skills you, and if relevant, your team (project and project co-leads, researchers, technicians, specialists, partners and so on), have and how this will help to deliver the proposed work. You can include individuals’ specific achievements but only choose past contributions that best evidence their ability to deliver this work.
Complete this section using the R4RI module headings listed below. You should use each heading once and include a response for the whole team, see the UKRI guidance on R4RI. You should consider how to balance your answer, and emphasise where appropriate the following key skills each team member brings:
- contributions to the generation of new ideas, tools, methodologies, or knowledge
- the development of others and maintenance of effective working relationships
- contributions to the wider research and innovation community
- contributions to broader research or innovation users and audiences and towards wider societal benefit
Additions
Provide any further details relevant to your application. This section is optional and can be up to 500 words. You should not use it to describe additional skills, experiences or outputs, but you can use it to describe any factors that provide context for the rest of your R4RI (for example, details of career breaks if you wish to disclose them).
You should complete this section as a narrative. Do not format it like a CV.
Resources and costs
Word limit: 1,500
What will you need to procure to deliver the proposed equipment and how much will it cost?
To describe the equipment you are requesting, you must complete the cost summary table (DOCX 98.7KB) supplied in the ‘Additional information’ section and paste this table into the text box as part of your application.
The information provided in this table should match your equipment quotes. There is no option to upload quote documents directly. If you are unable to obtain three quotes, please explain why in this section.
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Justify the application’s costs, in particular:
- details of the equipment requested
- details of the service or maintenance service requested (if applicable)
- details of any cash contributions to the equipment from other sources
- reasons for choosing a quoted equipment (versus other quotes)
- reasons for requesting a particular specification of equipment or a particular manufacturer
You can request costs associated with reasonable adjustments where they increase as a direct result of working on the project. For further information see Disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders. Where a funding limit is imposed on the opportunity, requested costs for reasonable adjustments may exceed the maximum funding amount.
Assessors are not looking for detailed costs or a line-by-line breakdown of all project resources. Overall, they want you to demonstrate how the resources you anticipate needing for your proposed equipment:
- are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
- represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
- maximise potential outcomes and impacts
Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI)
What are the ethical and RRI considerations, implications and issues relating to the proposed work? If you do not think that the proposed work raises any ethical or RRI issues, explain why.
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Demonstrate that you have identified and evaluated:
- the relevant ethical and RRI considerations, including both the research or topic area itself and the design and delivery of the project
- the wider implications of the proposed work, and how you will maximise the positive societal, environmental, and economic benefits arising from the project, whilst minimising unintended negative impacts, such as research misuse or accidental harm
- how you will manage these considerations throughout the lifecycle of the project
You should consider ethical and RRI issues that may arise at each stage of the equipment delivery. For ALERT specifically, you should demonstrate how you have considered ethics and RRI from initial procurement processes, through to the use and management of the equipment.
Please refer to the UKRI position statement on funding ethical research and Responsible innovation for more information around our expectations on ethical and responsible research and innovation.
Animal involvement and ‘3Rs’
You must complete this section about how your proposed project will involve or impact animals.
If your project does not involve or impact animals, you must confirm this on the next page.
You may be asked about:
- what animals you are involving
- the severity of the procedures you are using
- where the procedures will take place
- welfare standards you aim to meet
- the relevance of your project to the development, validation or dissemination of the 3Rs
You may also need to download, complete, and upload at least one set of additional questions. You will be told how to do this towards the end of this section.
To complete this section and check whether your project is in the scope of the questions, refer to the UKRI policy for research and innovation involving animals.
What counts as an animal
UKRI policy relates to all animals in the kingdom Animalia, including vertebrates and invertebrates.
Genetically modified organisms and biological risk
You must complete this section if your project will include genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies.
If you project does not involve genetically modified organisms or genetic technologies, you must confirm this on the next page.
You may be asked about:
- the type of organism your project will involve and the procedures your project will include
- the intended use of the organism or genetic technology
- the genetic, biological and environmental risks of your project
For more information, see UKRI’s guidance on genetic technologies.
Human participation in health-related research
You must complete this section about whether your project will include human participation.
If your project does not involve human participation, you must confirm this on the next page.
You may be asked about:
- what type of human participation your project includes
- the project design for human participation
- the phase of the clinical trial
- whether the project will be in an NHS setting, and if so, how the project will be registered
- whether diversity and inclusion will be considered
For more information, see UKRI’s guidance for human participants in research.
Host organisation’s support
Word limit: 1,500
Provide details of support from your research organisation.
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Ensure the head of department (or equivalent) of the host organisation provides you with a supporting statement (which they have written), that includes details of any additional support that might add value to the work.
Assessors will be looking for a strong statement of support from your research organisation. This information should have been approved for submission by an appropriate institutional authority.
You must also include the following details:
- full name
- their position or role
- the department, school or institute they lead
- their contact details
The statement of support provided by your host organisation should be copied and pasted into the text box. You cannot upload the statement of support to this section as an attachment. Your application may be rejected if you upload a host organisation statement of support to the ‘Project partners: letters (or emails) of support’ section or any other section of your application.
If there are other research organisations named in the core team that are significantly contributing to the application and would like to provide a statement of support, please provide in this section within the specified word limit.
Project partners
Add details about any project partners’ contributions. If there are no project partners, you can indicate this on the Funding Service.
A project partner is a collaborating organisation who will have an integral role in the proposed research. This may include direct contributions for example cash, donated equipment and resources, or staff seconded to the project, or indirect and in-kind contributions for example use of project partner’s equipment, datasets, or facilities. Project partners may be in industry, academia, third sector or government organisations in the UK or overseas, including partners based in the EU.
Add the following project partner details:
- the organisation name and address (searchable via a drop-down list or enter the organisation’s details manually, as applicable)
- the project partner contact name and email address
- the type of contribution (direct or indirect) and its monetary value
If a detail is entered incorrectly and you have saved the entry, remove the specific project partner record and re-add it with the correct information.
For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.
Project partners: letters (or emails) of support
Upload a single PDF containing the letters or emails of support from each partner you named in the ‘Project partners’ section. These should be uploaded in English or Welsh only.
We will not accept any other letters (or emails) of support from individuals or organisations not identified as project partner(s), such as those simply expressing general support for the proposed equipment. If included, these letters will not be used in the assessment process.
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Enter the words ‘attachment supplied’ in the text box, or if you do not have any project partners enter ‘N/A’. Each letter or email you provide should:
- confirm the partner’s commitment to the project
- clearly explain the value, relevance, and possible benefits of the work to them
- describe any additional value that they bring to the project
- have a page limit of one side of A4 per partner
The Funding Service will provide document upload details when you apply.
If you do not have any project partners, you will be able to indicate this in the Funding Service.
Ensure you have prior agreement from project partners so that, if you are offered funding, they will support your project as indicated in the ‘Project partners’ section.
For audit purposes, UKRI requires formal collaboration agreements to be put in place if an award is made.
Data management and sharing
Word limit: 750
How will you manage and share data collected or acquired through the proposed research?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Provide a data management plan that clearly details how you will comply with UKRI’s published data sharing policy, which includes detailed guidance notes.
You should identify:
- any legal and ethical considerations relating to the collection, storage and sharing of data, including consent confidentiality, anonymisation, and measure to maximize future data reuse
- any formal information standards with which the proposed work will comply
Trusted research & innovation (TR&I)
TR&I is the protection of the UK’s intellectual property, sensitive research, people, and infrastructure from potential theft, misuse, and exploitation.
Organisations receiving UKRI funding are obliged to act in line with UK government legislation. They are also expected to undertake appropriate due diligence assessments of organisations involved in research partnerships, collaboration agreements, and commercial contracts.
You will be asked:
- which areas of the National Security and Investment (NSI) Act your project relates to
- who you intend to collaborate with and how
- whether your project requires an export control licence
Your answers may affect the T&Cs of your funding agreement if you are successful. We may use your answers to determine that our current T&Cs are sufficient or if additional T&Cs are required.